{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/49512"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/49512","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Not my brother's keeper: How ethnic violence causes infighting","abstract":"Why, during an ethnic conflict, would an ethnic group turn its weapons against itself? That is the question that motivates this dissertation. Such behavior is puzzling because as an ethnic group devotes valuable time, energy, and resources on an intra-group conflict, it reduces the total amount of resources the group can draw on to wage the ethnic conflict. Unfortunately, the ethnic conflict literature provides few answers to the puzzle of infighting during ethnic conflict because the ethnic conflict literature generally assumes that ethnic violence increases ethnic cohesion. I examine that assumption in detail, and find it both theoretically and empirically flawed. Instead, I argue that both at the factional level and at the individual level, ethnic violence creates incentives and opportunities for fragmentation, and the ethnic leadership then engages in infighting to counter this pressure. I test the theory using both large-n statistical analyses, as well as process tracing and case studies. Both empirical analyses provide evidence to support the theory, challenging the claim that ethnic violence increases ethnic cohesion. Ultimately, I conclude that infighting during ethnic conflict is the irrational macro-level outcome of rational micro-level choices.","abstract_html":"Why, during an ethnic conflict, would an ethnic group turn its weapons against itself? That is the question that motivates this dissertation. Such behavior is puzzling because as an ethnic group devotes valuable time, energy, and resources on an intra-group conflict, it reduces the total amount of resources the group can draw on to wage the ethnic conflict. Unfortunately, the ethnic conflict literature provides few answers to the puzzle of infighting during ethnic conflict because the ethnic conflict literature generally assumes that ethnic violence increases ethnic cohesion. I examine that assumption in detail, and find it both theoretically and empirically flawed. Instead, I argue that both at the factional level and at the individual level, ethnic violence creates incentives and opportunities for fragmentation, and the ethnic leadership then engages in infighting to counter this pressure. I test the theory using both large-n statistical analyses, as well as process tracing and case studies. Both empirical analyses provide evidence to support the theory, challenging the claim that ethnic violence increases ethnic cohesion. Ultimately, I conclude that infighting during ethnic conflict is the irrational macro-level outcome of rational micro-level choices.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Arackal, Sheena"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Political Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Leff, Carol S.","Diehl, Paul F.","Vasquez, John A.","Bowers, Jake","Svolik, Milan"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-05-30T16:47:50Z","date_published":"2014-05-30T16:47:50Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:38Z","subjects":["Ethnic Violence","Infighting","Ethnic Conflict","Ethnicity"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2014 Sheena A. Arackal"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/49512","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Leff, Carol S.","Diehl, Paul F.","Vasquez, John A.","Bowers, Jake","Svolik, Milan"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Arackal, Sheena"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2014-05-30T16:47:50Z","2014-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Political Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Ethnic Violence","Infighting","Ethnic Conflict","Ethnicity"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2014 Sheena A. Arackal"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/49512"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Why, during an ethnic conflict, would an ethnic group turn its weapons against itself? That is the question that motivates this dissertation. Such behavior is puzzling because as an ethnic group devotes valuable time, energy, and resources on an intra-group conflict, it reduces the total amount of resources the group can draw on to wage the ethnic conflict. Unfortunately, the ethnic conflict literature provides few answers to the puzzle of infighting during ethnic conflict because the ethnic conflict literature generally assumes that ethnic violence increases ethnic cohesion. I examine that assumption in detail, and find it both theoretically and empirically flawed. Instead, I argue that both at the factional level and at the individual level, ethnic violence creates incentives and opportunities for fragmentation, and the ethnic leadership then engages in infighting to counter this pressure. I test the theory using both large-n statistical analyses, as well as process tracing and case studies. Both empirical analyses provide evidence to support the theory, challenging the claim that ethnic violence increases ethnic cohesion. Ultimately, I conclude that infighting during ethnic conflict is the irrational macro-level outcome of rational micro-level choices.","Item withdrawn by Laura Spradlin (lspradl2@illinois.edu) on 2014-04-16T14:39:19Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Arackal_Sheena.pdf: 1828317 bytes, checksum: 0f210eef2f77bd487cde653b7cab0bb8 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2014-05-30T16:47:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Sheena_Arackal.pdf: 1828317 bytes, checksum: 0f210eef2f77bd487cde653b7cab0bb8 (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: eb6ddd3a62b75b6e81809fffd23ae7be (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Not my brother's keeper: How ethnic violence causes infighting"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Leff, Carol S.","Diehl, Paul F.","Vasquez, John A.","Bowers, Jake","Svolik, Milan"],"dc:creator":["Arackal, Sheena"],"dc:date":["2014-05-30T16:47:50Z","2014-05"],"dc:description":["Why, during an ethnic conflict, would an ethnic group turn its weapons against itself? That is the question that motivates this dissertation. Such behavior is puzzling because as an ethnic group devotes valuable time, energy, and resources on an intra-group conflict, it reduces the total amount of resources the group can draw on to wage the ethnic conflict. Unfortunately, the ethnic conflict literature provides few answers to the puzzle of infighting during ethnic conflict because the ethnic conflict literature generally assumes that ethnic violence increases ethnic cohesion. I examine that assumption in detail, and find it both theoretically and empirically flawed. Instead, I argue that both at the factional level and at the individual level, ethnic violence creates incentives and opportunities for fragmentation, and the ethnic leadership then engages in infighting to counter this pressure. I test the theory using both large-n statistical analyses, as well as process tracing and case studies. Both empirical analyses provide evidence to support the theory, challenging the claim that ethnic violence increases ethnic cohesion. Ultimately, I conclude that infighting during ethnic conflict is the irrational macro-level outcome of rational micro-level choices.","Item withdrawn by Laura Spradlin (lspradl2@illinois.edu) on 2014-04-16T14:39:19Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Arackal_Sheena.pdf: 1828317 bytes, checksum: 0f210eef2f77bd487cde653b7cab0bb8 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2014-05-30T16:47:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Sheena_Arackal.pdf: 1828317 bytes, checksum: 0f210eef2f77bd487cde653b7cab0bb8 (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: eb6ddd3a62b75b6e81809fffd23ae7be (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/49512"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2014 Sheena A. Arackal"],"dc:subject":["Ethnic Violence","Infighting","Ethnic Conflict","Ethnicity"],"dc:title":["Not my brother's keeper: How ethnic violence causes infighting"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Political Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:38Z"}