{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/49437"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/49437","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Comparison of nonlinear filtering techniques","abstract":"In a recent work it is shown that importance sampling can be avoided in the particle filter through an innovation structure inspired by traditional nonlinear filtering combined with optimal control formalisms. The resulting algorithm is referred to as feedback particle filter. The purpose of this thesis is to provide a comparative study of the feedback particle filter (FPF). Two types of comparisons are discussed: i) with the extended Kalman filter, and ii) with the conventional resampling-based particle filters. The comparison with Kalman filter is used to highlight the feedback structure of the FPF. Also computational cost estimates are discussed, in terms of number of op- erations relative to EKF. Comparison with the conventional particle filtering ap- proaches is based on a numerical example taken from the survey article on the topic of nonlinear filtering. Comparisons are provided for both computational cost and accuracy.","abstract_html":"In a recent work it is shown that importance sampling can be avoided in the particle filter through an innovation structure inspired by traditional nonlinear filtering combined with optimal control formalisms. The resulting algorithm is referred to as feedback particle filter. The purpose of this thesis is to provide a comparative study of the feedback particle filter (FPF). Two types of comparisons are discussed: i) with the extended Kalman filter, and ii) with the conventional resampling-based particle filters. The comparison with Kalman filter is used to highlight the feedback structure of the FPF. Also computational cost estimates are discussed, in terms of number of op- erations relative to EKF. Comparison with the conventional particle filtering ap- proaches is based on a numerical example taken from the survey article on the topic of nonlinear filtering. Comparisons are provided for both computational cost and accuracy.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ghiotto, Shane"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Mechanical Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Mehta, Prashant G."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-05-30T16:44:03Z","date_published":"2014-05-30T16:44:03Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:38Z","subjects":["Filtering","state estimation","particle filtering","Kalman filter","feedback particle filter"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2014 Shane Ghiotto"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/49437","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Mehta, Prashant G."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ghiotto, Shane"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2014-05-30T16:44:03Z","2014-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Mechanical Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Filtering","state estimation","particle filtering","Kalman filter","feedback particle filter"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2014 Shane Ghiotto"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/49437"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["In a recent work it is shown that importance sampling can be avoided in the particle filter through an innovation structure inspired by traditional nonlinear filtering combined with optimal control formalisms. The resulting algorithm is referred to as feedback particle filter. The purpose of this thesis is to provide a comparative study of the feedback particle filter (FPF). Two types of comparisons are discussed: i) with the extended Kalman filter, and ii) with the conventional resampling-based particle filters. The comparison with Kalman filter is used to highlight the feedback structure of the FPF. Also computational cost estimates are discussed, in terms of number of op- erations relative to EKF. Comparison with the conventional particle filtering ap- proaches is based on a numerical example taken from the survey article on the topic of nonlinear filtering. Comparisons are provided for both computational cost and accuracy.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2014-04-24T19:29:05Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Ghiotto_Shane.pdf: 1605485 bytes, checksum: 184c958ed3ed8235d089576fa09c24c1 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2014-05-30T16:44:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Shane_Ghiotto.pdf: 1605498 bytes, checksum: a599f1cfc01e6c467dc905b4f4e1be4b (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: b6df58830014ec29d909dce114169ed6 (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Comparison of nonlinear filtering techniques"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Mehta, Prashant G."],"dc:creator":["Ghiotto, Shane"],"dc:date":["2014-05-30T16:44:03Z","2014-05"],"dc:description":["In a recent work it is shown that importance sampling can be avoided in the particle filter through an innovation structure inspired by traditional nonlinear filtering combined with optimal control formalisms. The resulting algorithm is referred to as feedback particle filter. The purpose of this thesis is to provide a comparative study of the feedback particle filter (FPF). Two types of comparisons are discussed: i) with the extended Kalman filter, and ii) with the conventional resampling-based particle filters. The comparison with Kalman filter is used to highlight the feedback structure of the FPF. Also computational cost estimates are discussed, in terms of number of op- erations relative to EKF. Comparison with the conventional particle filtering ap- proaches is based on a numerical example taken from the survey article on the topic of nonlinear filtering. Comparisons are provided for both computational cost and accuracy.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2014-04-24T19:29:05Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Ghiotto_Shane.pdf: 1605485 bytes, checksum: 184c958ed3ed8235d089576fa09c24c1 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2014-05-30T16:44:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Shane_Ghiotto.pdf: 1605498 bytes, checksum: a599f1cfc01e6c467dc905b4f4e1be4b (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: b6df58830014ec29d909dce114169ed6 (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/49437"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2014 Shane Ghiotto"],"dc:subject":["Filtering","state estimation","particle filtering","Kalman filter","feedback particle filter"],"dc:title":["Comparison of nonlinear filtering techniques"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Mechanical Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:38Z"}