{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/49360"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/49360","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Landscape as indigenous space: sovereignty and indigeneity in urban environments","abstract":"Although urban environments have been characterized as alienating to everyone, the level of displacement for many Indigenous peoples goes beyond that experienced by non-Indigenous peoples, in part because some Indigenous individuals are in fact locals made foreign through urbanization. This thesis explores how displaced Indigenous peoples have begun to appropriate the urban environment, and it relates that work to sovereignty. Throughout the United States and Canada today, there are many examples of buildings designed by architects to suit the interests and needs of Indigenous peoples. Have those structures done anything for Indigenous sovereignty? Do they embody or reinforce indigeneity more than do other, generic structures? Settler colonialism has long equated indigenous sovereignty with “self-determination,” and the governments of the United States and Canada have reinforced that understanding through policies of recognition and reconciliation. This thesis considers three alternative approaches—refusal, resentment, and tradition—and how those are conceived spatially. An analysis of five indigenous spaces in Winnipeg, Canada, then shows how indigeneity and sovereignty are represented or embodied through specific works in the contemporary built environment.","abstract_html":"Although urban environments have been characterized as alienating to everyone, the level of displacement for many Indigenous peoples goes beyond that experienced by non-Indigenous peoples, in part because some Indigenous individuals are in fact locals made foreign through urbanization. This thesis explores how displaced Indigenous peoples have begun to appropriate the urban environment, and it relates that work to sovereignty. Throughout the United States and Canada today, there are many examples of buildings designed by architects to suit the interests and needs of Indigenous peoples. Have those structures done anything for Indigenous sovereignty? Do they embody or reinforce indigeneity more than do other, generic structures? Settler colonialism has long equated indigenous sovereignty with “self-determination,” and the governments of the United States and Canada have reinforced that understanding through policies of recognition and reconciliation. This thesis considers three alternative approaches—refusal, resentment, and tradition—and how those are conceived spatially. An analysis of five indigenous spaces in Winnipeg, Canada, then shows how indigeneity and sovereignty are represented or embodied through specific works in the contemporary built environment.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Castillo-Pilcol, Jose"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.L.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Landscape Architecture","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Hays, David L."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-05-30T16:40:04Z","date_published":"2014-05-30T16:40:04Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:38Z","subjects":["Landscape Architecture","Architecture","Urban Environments","Indigenous Peoples","Indigeneity","Winnipeg","Sovereignty","Indigenous Sovereignty","Self-determination","Settler colonialism"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2014 José Castillo-Pilcol"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/49360","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Hays, David L."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Castillo-Pilcol, Jose"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2014-05-30T16:40:04Z","2014-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Landscape Architecture"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.L.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Landscape Architecture","Architecture","Urban Environments","Indigenous Peoples","Indigeneity","Winnipeg","Sovereignty","Indigenous Sovereignty","Self-determination","Settler colonialism"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2014 José Castillo-Pilcol"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/49360"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Although urban environments have been characterized as alienating to everyone, the level of displacement for many Indigenous peoples goes beyond that experienced by non-Indigenous peoples, in part because some Indigenous individuals are in fact locals made foreign through urbanization. This thesis explores how displaced Indigenous peoples have begun to appropriate the urban environment, and it relates that work to sovereignty. Throughout the United States and Canada today, there are many examples of buildings designed by architects to suit the interests and needs of Indigenous peoples. Have those structures done anything for Indigenous sovereignty? Do they embody or reinforce indigeneity more than do other, generic structures? Settler colonialism has long equated indigenous sovereignty with “self-determination,” and the governments of the United States and Canada have reinforced that understanding through policies of recognition and reconciliation. This thesis considers three alternative approaches—refusal, resentment, and tradition—and how those are conceived spatially. An analysis of five indigenous spaces in Winnipeg, Canada, then shows how indigeneity and sovereignty are represented or embodied through specific works in the contemporary built environment.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2014-05-02T20:52:18Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Castillo-Pilcol_José.pdf: 9628334 bytes, checksum: 1281b897584b4780e642720340944b2e (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2014-05-30T16:40:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Jose_Castillo-Pilcol.pdf: 9628334 bytes, checksum: 1281b897584b4780e642720340944b2e (MD5) license.txt: 4070 bytes, checksum: 137fd96c631ad75b25b843921ded52cf (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Landscape as indigenous space: sovereignty and indigeneity in urban environments"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Hays, David L."],"dc:creator":["Castillo-Pilcol, Jose"],"dc:date":["2014-05-30T16:40:04Z","2014-05"],"dc:description":["Although urban environments have been characterized as alienating to everyone, the level of displacement for many Indigenous peoples goes beyond that experienced by non-Indigenous peoples, in part because some Indigenous individuals are in fact locals made foreign through urbanization. This thesis explores how displaced Indigenous peoples have begun to appropriate the urban environment, and it relates that work to sovereignty. Throughout the United States and Canada today, there are many examples of buildings designed by architects to suit the interests and needs of Indigenous peoples. Have those structures done anything for Indigenous sovereignty? Do they embody or reinforce indigeneity more than do other, generic structures? Settler colonialism has long equated indigenous sovereignty with “self-determination,” and the governments of the United States and Canada have reinforced that understanding through policies of recognition and reconciliation. This thesis considers three alternative approaches—refusal, resentment, and tradition—and how those are conceived spatially. An analysis of five indigenous spaces in Winnipeg, Canada, then shows how indigeneity and sovereignty are represented or embodied through specific works in the contemporary built environment.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2014-05-02T20:52:18Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Castillo-Pilcol_José.pdf: 9628334 bytes, checksum: 1281b897584b4780e642720340944b2e (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2014-05-30T16:40:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Jose_Castillo-Pilcol.pdf: 9628334 bytes, checksum: 1281b897584b4780e642720340944b2e (MD5) license.txt: 4070 bytes, checksum: 137fd96c631ad75b25b843921ded52cf (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/49360"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2014 José Castillo-Pilcol"],"dc:subject":["Landscape Architecture","Architecture","Urban Environments","Indigenous Peoples","Indigeneity","Winnipeg","Sovereignty","Indigenous Sovereignty","Self-determination","Settler colonialism"],"dc:title":["Landscape as indigenous space: sovereignty and indigeneity in urban environments"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Landscape Architecture"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.L.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:38Z"}