{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/46899"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/46899","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The effects of written corrective feedback on second language writing focused on the English articles system","abstract":"The present study explored the effectiveness of different types of written corrective feedback and error logs in L2 writing focused on English articles. For this study, during a semester, 25 undergraduate students in two intact ESL writing courses received implicit or explicit feedback while one of the classes were asked to keep error logs after receiving corrective feedback. To examine students’ improvement, analysis of four writing tasks and a grammaticality judgment test were carried out. Statistical analysis of the data showed that corrective feedback was effective on the acquisition of English articles, and keeping error logs after receiving corrective feedback was effective to help students to better retain the received corrective feedback. The results also showed that implicit corrective feedback was more effective than explicit corrective feedback when students were asked to keep error logs after receiving corrective feedback while explicit corrective feedback was more effective when they did not keep error logs. The results suggest that receiving corrective feedback and keeping error logs can have a positive effect on L2 acquisition and the effectiveness of implicit and explicit feedback can be affected by other variables.","abstract_html":"The present study explored the effectiveness of different types of written corrective feedback and error logs in L2 writing focused on English articles. For this study, during a semester, 25 undergraduate students in two intact ESL writing courses received implicit or explicit feedback while one of the classes were asked to keep error logs after receiving corrective feedback. To examine students’ improvement, analysis of four writing tasks and a grammaticality judgment test were carried out. Statistical analysis of the data showed that corrective feedback was effective on the acquisition of English articles, and keeping error logs after receiving corrective feedback was effective to help students to better retain the received corrective feedback. The results also showed that implicit corrective feedback was more effective than explicit corrective feedback when students were asked to keep error logs after receiving corrective feedback while explicit corrective feedback was more effective when they did not keep error logs. The results suggest that receiving corrective feedback and keeping error logs can have a positive effect on L2 acquisition and the effectiveness of implicit and explicit feedback can be affected by other variables.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Choi, Sea Hee"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Teaching of English Sec Lang","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Sadler, Randall W."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-01-16T18:25:44Z","date_published":"2014-01-16T18:25:44Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:38Z","subjects":["Written corrective feedback","Second language (L2) writing","error logs","implicit and explicit corrective feedback"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2013 Sea Hee Choi"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/46899","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Sadler, Randall W."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Choi, Sea Hee"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2014-01-16T18:25:44Z","2016-01-16T11:00:32Z","2013-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Teaching of English Sec Lang"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Written corrective feedback","Second language (L2) writing","error logs","implicit and explicit corrective feedback"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2013 Sea Hee Choi"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/46899"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The present study explored the effectiveness of different types of written corrective feedback and error logs in L2 writing focused on English articles. For this study, during a semester, 25 undergraduate students in two intact ESL writing courses received implicit or explicit feedback while one of the classes were asked to keep error logs after receiving corrective feedback. To examine students’ improvement, analysis of four writing tasks and a grammaticality judgment test were carried out. Statistical analysis of the data showed that corrective feedback was effective on the acquisition of English articles, and keeping error logs after receiving corrective feedback was effective to help students to better retain the received corrective feedback. The results also showed that implicit corrective feedback was more effective than explicit corrective feedback when students were asked to keep error logs after receiving corrective feedback while explicit corrective feedback was more effective when they did not keep error logs. The results suggest that receiving corrective feedback and keeping error logs can have a positive effect on L2 acquisition and the effectiveness of implicit and explicit feedback can be affected by other variables.","Item withdrawn by Laura Spradlin (lspradl2@illinois.edu) on 2013-12-12T17:51:43Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Choi_Sea Hee.pdf: 1701312 bytes, checksum: 7102b06fb5e76812626074f2e613f70e (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2014-01-16T18:25:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Sea Hee_Choi.pdf: 1695272 bytes, checksum: 575c7887a4a24bbb637ba0ef0f38f595 (MD5) license.txt: 4061 bytes, checksum: 22c1a6d1003fdbea8444a7ad3f2bbb6b (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by Seth Robbins (robbins.sd@gmail.com) on 2014-01-16T18:27:33Z Item is restricted until 2016-01-16T18:27:27Z","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:36:45-05:00 Original Data Group with Access Administrator Release Date: 2016-01-16 12:27:27 UTC Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 46918 on 2016-01-16T11:00:32Z."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The effects of written corrective feedback on second language writing focused on the English articles system"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Sadler, Randall W."],"dc:creator":["Choi, Sea Hee"],"dc:date":["2014-01-16T18:25:44Z","2016-01-16T11:00:32Z","2013-12"],"dc:description":["The present study explored the effectiveness of different types of written corrective feedback and error logs in L2 writing focused on English articles. For this study, during a semester, 25 undergraduate students in two intact ESL writing courses received implicit or explicit feedback while one of the classes were asked to keep error logs after receiving corrective feedback. To examine students’ improvement, analysis of four writing tasks and a grammaticality judgment test were carried out. Statistical analysis of the data showed that corrective feedback was effective on the acquisition of English articles, and keeping error logs after receiving corrective feedback was effective to help students to better retain the received corrective feedback. The results also showed that implicit corrective feedback was more effective than explicit corrective feedback when students were asked to keep error logs after receiving corrective feedback while explicit corrective feedback was more effective when they did not keep error logs. The results suggest that receiving corrective feedback and keeping error logs can have a positive effect on L2 acquisition and the effectiveness of implicit and explicit feedback can be affected by other variables.","Item withdrawn by Laura Spradlin (lspradl2@illinois.edu) on 2013-12-12T17:51:43Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Choi_Sea Hee.pdf: 1701312 bytes, checksum: 7102b06fb5e76812626074f2e613f70e (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2014-01-16T18:25:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Sea Hee_Choi.pdf: 1695272 bytes, checksum: 575c7887a4a24bbb637ba0ef0f38f595 (MD5) license.txt: 4061 bytes, checksum: 22c1a6d1003fdbea8444a7ad3f2bbb6b (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by Seth Robbins (robbins.sd@gmail.com) on 2014-01-16T18:27:33Z Item is restricted until 2016-01-16T18:27:27Z","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:36:45-05:00 Original Data Group with Access Administrator Release Date: 2016-01-16 12:27:27 UTC Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 46918 on 2016-01-16T11:00:32Z."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/46899"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2013 Sea Hee Choi"],"dc:subject":["Written corrective feedback","Second language (L2) writing","error logs","implicit and explicit corrective feedback"],"dc:title":["The effects of written corrective feedback on second language writing focused on the English articles system"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Teaching of English Sec Lang"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:38Z"}