{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/42316"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/42316","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Mapping the topography of the evidence use terrain in assessment of U.S. higher education: a multiple case study approach","abstract":"Institutions of higher education in the United States operate within a climate of accountability and transparency where they are constantly asked to provide evidence of institutional effectiveness and quality assurance to multiple stakeholders, but little is known about how institutions actually use evidence of student learning to improve. This study examined the terrain of evidence use by exploring what the process of “use” looks like within institutions and how it unfolds; how evidence is constructed for “use” in claims regarding improvement or accountability; and if conceptual frameworks exist within the assessment literature to study such “use.” Two sites were purposefully selected as nationally recognized institutions where evidence of student learning was being used to improve performance. Data were collected via interviews, webscans, and document review from both institutions over a five month period. The study found that individuals within the institutions engaged in the use of assessment data through telling evidence-based stories which involved using evidence in support of claims or arguments about improvement or accountability as told through stories designed to persuade a specific audience. The study presents evidence-based storytelling as a complex, interactive process involving individual cognition and organizational structures that is contrasted with problem-solving models of use more regularly found within assessment literature.","abstract_html":"Institutions of higher education in the United States operate within a climate of accountability and transparency where they are constantly asked to provide evidence of institutional effectiveness and quality assurance to multiple stakeholders, but little is known about how institutions actually use evidence of student learning to improve. This study examined the terrain of evidence use by exploring what the process of “use” looks like within institutions and how it unfolds; how evidence is constructed for “use” in claims regarding improvement or accountability; and if conceptual frameworks exist within the assessment literature to study such “use.” Two sites were purposefully selected as nationally recognized institutions where evidence of student learning was being used to improve performance. Data were collected via interviews, webscans, and document review from both institutions over a five month period. The study found that individuals within the institutions engaged in the use of assessment data through telling evidence-based stories which involved using evidence in support of claims or arguments about improvement or accountability as told through stories designed to persuade a specific audience. The study presents evidence-based storytelling as a complex, interactive process involving individual cognition and organizational structures that is contrasted with problem-solving models of use more regularly found within assessment literature.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Jankowski, Natasha"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Ed Organization and Leadership","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Schwandt, Thomas A.","Ikenberry, Stanley O.","Greene, Jennifer C.","Cain, Timothy R."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-02-03T19:35:08Z","date_published":"2013-02-03T19:35:08Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:33Z","subjects":["Assessment","evidence use","decision making","learning outcomes","Accountability","transparency","storytelling"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2012 Natasha Jankowski"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/42316","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Schwandt, Thomas A.","Ikenberry, Stanley O.","Greene, Jennifer C.","Cain, Timothy R."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Jankowski, Natasha"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2013-02-03T19:35:08Z","2012-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Ed Organization and Leadership"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Assessment","evidence use","decision making","learning outcomes","Accountability","transparency","storytelling"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2012 Natasha Jankowski"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/42316"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Institutions of higher education in the United States operate within a climate of accountability and transparency where they are constantly asked to provide evidence of institutional effectiveness and quality assurance to multiple stakeholders, but little is known about how institutions actually use evidence of student learning to improve. This study examined the terrain of evidence use by exploring what the process of “use” looks like within institutions and how it unfolds; how evidence is constructed for “use” in claims regarding improvement or accountability; and if conceptual frameworks exist within the assessment literature to study such “use.” Two sites were purposefully selected as nationally recognized institutions where evidence of student learning was being used to improve performance. Data were collected via interviews, webscans, and document review from both institutions over a five month period. The study found that individuals within the institutions engaged in the use of assessment data through telling evidence-based stories which involved using evidence in support of claims or arguments about improvement or accountability as told through stories designed to persuade a specific audience. The study presents evidence-based storytelling as a complex, interactive process involving individual cognition and organizational structures that is contrasted with problem-solving models of use more regularly found within assessment literature.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-11-26T14:57:03Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Jankowski_Natasha.docx: 319393 bytes, checksum: 98ba503cb24c59b622ef5b1767bd7370 (MD5) Jankowski_Natasha.pdf: 1785345 bytes, checksum: 8da414228abd52da38a366cd463405de (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2013-02-03T19:35:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Natasha_Jankowski.pdf: 1785352 bytes, checksum: a427b3d48683a10db760def7a51f04ec (MD5) license.txt: 4067 bytes, checksum: e8455d2450c63bccf74f5867cd74ceec (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Mapping the topography of the evidence use terrain in assessment of U.S. higher education: a multiple case study approach"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Schwandt, Thomas A.","Ikenberry, Stanley O.","Greene, Jennifer C.","Cain, Timothy R."],"dc:creator":["Jankowski, Natasha"],"dc:date":["2013-02-03T19:35:08Z","2012-12"],"dc:description":["Institutions of higher education in the United States operate within a climate of accountability and transparency where they are constantly asked to provide evidence of institutional effectiveness and quality assurance to multiple stakeholders, but little is known about how institutions actually use evidence of student learning to improve. This study examined the terrain of evidence use by exploring what the process of “use” looks like within institutions and how it unfolds; how evidence is constructed for “use” in claims regarding improvement or accountability; and if conceptual frameworks exist within the assessment literature to study such “use.” Two sites were purposefully selected as nationally recognized institutions where evidence of student learning was being used to improve performance. Data were collected via interviews, webscans, and document review from both institutions over a five month period. The study found that individuals within the institutions engaged in the use of assessment data through telling evidence-based stories which involved using evidence in support of claims or arguments about improvement or accountability as told through stories designed to persuade a specific audience. The study presents evidence-based storytelling as a complex, interactive process involving individual cognition and organizational structures that is contrasted with problem-solving models of use more regularly found within assessment literature.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-11-26T14:57:03Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Jankowski_Natasha.docx: 319393 bytes, checksum: 98ba503cb24c59b622ef5b1767bd7370 (MD5) Jankowski_Natasha.pdf: 1785345 bytes, checksum: 8da414228abd52da38a366cd463405de (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2013-02-03T19:35:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Natasha_Jankowski.pdf: 1785352 bytes, checksum: a427b3d48683a10db760def7a51f04ec (MD5) license.txt: 4067 bytes, checksum: e8455d2450c63bccf74f5867cd74ceec (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/42316"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2012 Natasha Jankowski"],"dc:subject":["Assessment","evidence use","decision making","learning outcomes","Accountability","transparency","storytelling"],"dc:title":["Mapping the topography of the evidence use terrain in assessment of U.S. higher education: a multiple case study approach"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Ed Organization and Leadership"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:33Z"}