{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/34535"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/34535","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The nature of public action: social environments, psychological traits and mobilization","abstract":"When advancing our personal interests and our notions of the common interest, we must often act cooperatively with others to pursue common goals. The challenges that can arise are notorious. Citizens can benefit from outcomes, even if they do not contribute to the public actions that create them. When political goals require the efforts of many, and the benefits to the individual remain uncertain, citizens may refrain from taking action. Of course, if no one takes action, or if too few do, individual and collective interests can go unrealized. Understanding the challenges of mobilization therefore requires addressing the question of motivation. What motivates the individual citizen to participate in collective, public action? For quite some time now, the dominant approach to addressing it has involved looking outward, toward the social processes and environmental conditions that shape the human experience. This approach has fostered a very popular image of the citizen. In this image, the citizen is a blank slate upon which external factors inscribe beliefs, values, and motivations for taking action. Based on this popular image of the citizen, the goal of mobilization is to create incentives and reduce disincentives to participate by changing the social environment the citizen experiences. The central argument of this project is that this popular image must be revised. In addition to looking outward, toward the social environment, we must also look inward by considering how our biologically-linked psychological traits can influence our experience of social processes and environmental conditions. This part of our humanity is often overlooked in discussions of citizenship and public action. However, this project demonstrates that traits not only influence propensities for taking public action, but also influence the likelihood that citizens will be targeted for contact during mobilization efforts. In doing, the project illustrates how psychological traits contribute to the challenges we face in politics and strategies of cooperation that help us meet these challenges. At the core of this project is an analytical framework that is sensitive to how citizen motivations can be influenced by both external, social factors and biologically-linked psychological traits. This framework is applied to examine the mobilization of publics in three different contexts: elections, jury service, and direct action organizing.","abstract_html":"When advancing our personal interests and our notions of the common interest, we must often act cooperatively with others to pursue common goals. The challenges that can arise are notorious. Citizens can benefit from outcomes, even if they do not contribute to the public actions that create them. When political goals require the efforts of many, and the benefits to the individual remain uncertain, citizens may refrain from taking action. Of course, if no one takes action, or if too few do, individual and collective interests can go unrealized. Understanding the challenges of mobilization therefore requires addressing the question of motivation. What motivates the individual citizen to participate in collective, public action? For quite some time now, the dominant approach to addressing it has involved looking outward, toward the social processes and environmental conditions that shape the human experience. This approach has fostered a very popular image of the citizen. In this image, the citizen is a blank slate upon which external factors inscribe beliefs, values, and motivations for taking action. Based on this popular image of the citizen, the goal of mobilization is to create incentives and reduce disincentives to participate by changing the social environment the citizen experiences. The central argument of this project is that this popular image must be revised. In addition to looking outward, toward the social environment, we must also look inward by considering how our biologically-linked psychological traits can influence our experience of social processes and environmental conditions. This part of our humanity is often overlooked in discussions of citizenship and public action. However, this project demonstrates that traits not only influence propensities for taking public action, but also influence the likelihood that citizens will be targeted for contact during mobilization efforts. In doing, the project illustrates how psychological traits contribute to the challenges we face in politics and strategies of cooperation that help us meet these challenges. At the core of this project is an analytical framework that is sensitive to how citizen motivations can be influenced by both external, social factors and biologically-linked psychological traits. This framework is applied to examine the mobilization of publics in three different contexts: elections, jury service, and direct action organizing.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bloeser, Andrew"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Political Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Mondak, Jeffery J.","Kuklinski, James H.","Rudolph, Thomas J.","Canache, Damarys J."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-09-18T21:24:33Z","date_published":"2012-09-18T21:24:33Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:31Z","subjects":["mobilization","personality","psychological traits","Big Five","public"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2012 Andrew Bloeser"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34535","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Mondak, Jeffery J.","Kuklinski, James H.","Rudolph, Thomas J.","Canache, Damarys J."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bloeser, Andrew"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-09-18T21:24:33Z","2014-09-18T10:00:36Z","2012-08"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Political Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["mobilization","personality","psychological traits","Big Five","public"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2012 Andrew Bloeser"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34535"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["When advancing our personal interests and our notions of the common interest, we must often act cooperatively with others to pursue common goals. The challenges that can arise are notorious. Citizens can benefit from outcomes, even if they do not contribute to the public actions that create them. When political goals require the efforts of many, and the benefits to the individual remain uncertain, citizens may refrain from taking action. Of course, if no one takes action, or if too few do, individual and collective interests can go unrealized. Understanding the challenges of mobilization therefore requires addressing the question of motivation. What motivates the individual citizen to participate in collective, public action? For quite some time now, the dominant approach to addressing it has involved looking outward, toward the social processes and environmental conditions that shape the human experience. This approach has fostered a very popular image of the citizen. In this image, the citizen is a blank slate upon which external factors inscribe beliefs, values, and motivations for taking action. Based on this popular image of the citizen, the goal of mobilization is to create incentives and reduce disincentives to participate by changing the social environment the citizen experiences. The central argument of this project is that this popular image must be revised. In addition to looking outward, toward the social environment, we must also look inward by considering how our biologically-linked psychological traits can influence our experience of social processes and environmental conditions. This part of our humanity is often overlooked in discussions of citizenship and public action. However, this project demonstrates that traits not only influence propensities for taking public action, but also influence the likelihood that citizens will be targeted for contact during mobilization efforts. In doing, the project illustrates how psychological traits contribute to the challenges we face in politics and strategies of cooperation that help us meet these challenges. At the core of this project is an analytical framework that is sensitive to how citizen motivations can be influenced by both external, social factors and biologically-linked psychological traits. This framework is applied to examine the mobilization of publics in three different contexts: elections, jury service, and direct action organizing.","Item withdrawn by Rebecca Bryant (rabryant@illinois.edu) on 2012-07-10T13:26:39Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Bloeser_Andrew.pdf: 1342154 bytes, checksum: f8c7a33a00dbb8912533aaf70006f10c (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-09-18T21:24:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Bloeser_Andrew.pdf: 1342154 bytes, checksum: f8c7a33a00dbb8912533aaf70006f10c (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: 82eb609be7000c81fb74901aba30dbe8 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by Seth Robbins (srobbins@illinois.edu) on 2012-09-18T21:27:23Z Item is restricted until 2014-09-18T21:27:16Z","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:35:45-05:00 Original Data Group with Access Administrator Release Date: 2014-09-18 16:27:16 UTC Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 34809 on 2014-09-18T10:00:36Z."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The nature of public action: social environments, psychological traits and mobilization"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Mondak, Jeffery J.","Kuklinski, James H.","Rudolph, Thomas J.","Canache, Damarys J."],"dc:creator":["Bloeser, Andrew"],"dc:date":["2012-09-18T21:24:33Z","2014-09-18T10:00:36Z","2012-08"],"dc:description":["When advancing our personal interests and our notions of the common interest, we must often act cooperatively with others to pursue common goals. The challenges that can arise are notorious. Citizens can benefit from outcomes, even if they do not contribute to the public actions that create them. When political goals require the efforts of many, and the benefits to the individual remain uncertain, citizens may refrain from taking action. Of course, if no one takes action, or if too few do, individual and collective interests can go unrealized. Understanding the challenges of mobilization therefore requires addressing the question of motivation. What motivates the individual citizen to participate in collective, public action? For quite some time now, the dominant approach to addressing it has involved looking outward, toward the social processes and environmental conditions that shape the human experience. This approach has fostered a very popular image of the citizen. In this image, the citizen is a blank slate upon which external factors inscribe beliefs, values, and motivations for taking action. Based on this popular image of the citizen, the goal of mobilization is to create incentives and reduce disincentives to participate by changing the social environment the citizen experiences. The central argument of this project is that this popular image must be revised. In addition to looking outward, toward the social environment, we must also look inward by considering how our biologically-linked psychological traits can influence our experience of social processes and environmental conditions. This part of our humanity is often overlooked in discussions of citizenship and public action. However, this project demonstrates that traits not only influence propensities for taking public action, but also influence the likelihood that citizens will be targeted for contact during mobilization efforts. In doing, the project illustrates how psychological traits contribute to the challenges we face in politics and strategies of cooperation that help us meet these challenges. At the core of this project is an analytical framework that is sensitive to how citizen motivations can be influenced by both external, social factors and biologically-linked psychological traits. This framework is applied to examine the mobilization of publics in three different contexts: elections, jury service, and direct action organizing.","Item withdrawn by Rebecca Bryant (rabryant@illinois.edu) on 2012-07-10T13:26:39Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Bloeser_Andrew.pdf: 1342154 bytes, checksum: f8c7a33a00dbb8912533aaf70006f10c (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-09-18T21:24:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Bloeser_Andrew.pdf: 1342154 bytes, checksum: f8c7a33a00dbb8912533aaf70006f10c (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: 82eb609be7000c81fb74901aba30dbe8 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by Seth Robbins (srobbins@illinois.edu) on 2012-09-18T21:27:23Z Item is restricted until 2014-09-18T21:27:16Z","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:35:45-05:00 Original Data Group with Access Administrator Release Date: 2014-09-18 16:27:16 UTC Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 34809 on 2014-09-18T10:00:36Z."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34535"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2012 Andrew Bloeser"],"dc:subject":["mobilization","personality","psychological traits","Big Five","public"],"dc:title":["The nature of public action: social environments, psychological traits and mobilization"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Political Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:31Z"}