{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/34466"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/34466","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The perception of good and bad natural scene category exemplars","abstract":"Images of natural scenes are easily categorized by human observers. Recent work has shown that “good” images, or those that are more representative of their category, are more easily categorized than “bad” ones. The present research investigates a novel hypothesis: that “good” images of scenes are more easily perceived than bad images. Participants performed a two-alternative forced choice task in which they indicated whether an image was an intact or phase-scrambled scene photograph. In this task, observers were able to “see” good images better than bad scenes, more accurately detecting their brief presentations. This effect is not influenced by prior knowledge about the categories used in the experiment. Scene inversion is also shown to have a similar effect on the intact/scrambled discrimination effect, but it does not interact with category representativeness, indicating that the advantage conferred by good exemplars is invariant to inversion. Finally, the good and bad images were analyzed using an objective estimate of image typicality, and this factor was also shown to predict observers' ability to detect the images. These results document a close relationship between natural scene categorization and detection, suggesting that rapid scene perception is strongly influenced by our experience with typical and representative environments.","abstract_html":"Images of natural scenes are easily categorized by human observers. Recent work has shown that “good” images, or those that are more representative of their category, are more easily categorized than “bad” ones. The present research investigates a novel hypothesis: that “good” images of scenes are more easily perceived than bad images. Participants performed a two-alternative forced choice task in which they indicated whether an image was an intact or phase-scrambled scene photograph. In this task, observers were able to “see” good images better than bad scenes, more accurately detecting their brief presentations. This effect is not influenced by prior knowledge about the categories used in the experiment. Scene inversion is also shown to have a similar effect on the intact/scrambled discrimination effect, but it does not interact with category representativeness, indicating that the advantage conferred by good exemplars is invariant to inversion. Finally, the good and bad images were analyzed using an objective estimate of image typicality, and this factor was also shown to predict observers' ability to detect the images. These results document a close relationship between natural scene categorization and detection, suggesting that rapid scene perception is strongly influenced by our experience with typical and representative environments.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Caddigan, Eamon"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Beck, Diane M.","Li, Fei-Fei","Simons, Daniel J.","Hummel, John E.","Lleras, Alejandro"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-09-18T21:18:30Z","date_published":"2012-09-18T21:18:30Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:31Z","subjects":["Scene Perception"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2012 Eamon Caddigan"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34466","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Beck, Diane M.","Li, Fei-Fei","Simons, Daniel J.","Hummel, John E.","Lleras, Alejandro"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Caddigan, Eamon"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-09-18T21:18:30Z","2014-09-18T10:00:47Z","2012-08"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Scene Perception"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2012 Eamon Caddigan"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34466"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Images of natural scenes are easily categorized by human observers. Recent work has shown that “good” images, or those that are more representative of their category, are more easily categorized than “bad” ones. The present research investigates a novel hypothesis: that “good” images of scenes are more easily perceived than bad images. Participants performed a two-alternative forced choice task in which they indicated whether an image was an intact or phase-scrambled scene photograph. In this task, observers were able to “see” good images better than bad scenes, more accurately detecting their brief presentations. This effect is not influenced by prior knowledge about the categories used in the experiment. Scene inversion is also shown to have a similar effect on the intact/scrambled discrimination effect, but it does not interact with category representativeness, indicating that the advantage conferred by good exemplars is invariant to inversion. Finally, the good and bad images were analyzed using an objective estimate of image typicality, and this factor was also shown to predict observers' ability to detect the images. These results document a close relationship between natural scene categorization and detection, suggesting that rapid scene perception is strongly influenced by our experience with typical and representative environments.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-06-08T15:35:36Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Caddigan_Eamon.doc: 2950656 bytes, checksum: cde9590c75859a3db0127e4afb17a321 (MD5) Caddigan_Eamon.pdf: 1528640 bytes, checksum: 417b5edd9df51243d05cf554962a9bcc (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-09-18T21:18:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Caddigan_Eamon.pdf: 1528640 bytes, checksum: 417b5edd9df51243d05cf554962a9bcc (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: c3a27ed967b2376facaccb48a8599d3d (MD5) Caddigan_Eamon.doc: 2950656 bytes, checksum: cde9590c75859a3db0127e4afb17a321 (MD5)","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:35:05-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: 2014-09-18 16:21:01 UTC Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Seth Robbins (srobbins@illinois.edu) on 2012-09-18T21:21:10Z Item is restricted until 2014-09-18T21:21:01Z","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 34740 on 2014-09-18T10:00:47Z."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The perception of good and bad natural scene category exemplars"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Beck, Diane M.","Li, Fei-Fei","Simons, Daniel J.","Hummel, John E.","Lleras, Alejandro"],"dc:creator":["Caddigan, Eamon"],"dc:date":["2012-09-18T21:18:30Z","2014-09-18T10:00:47Z","2012-08"],"dc:description":["Images of natural scenes are easily categorized by human observers. Recent work has shown that “good” images, or those that are more representative of their category, are more easily categorized than “bad” ones. The present research investigates a novel hypothesis: that “good” images of scenes are more easily perceived than bad images. Participants performed a two-alternative forced choice task in which they indicated whether an image was an intact or phase-scrambled scene photograph. In this task, observers were able to “see” good images better than bad scenes, more accurately detecting their brief presentations. This effect is not influenced by prior knowledge about the categories used in the experiment. Scene inversion is also shown to have a similar effect on the intact/scrambled discrimination effect, but it does not interact with category representativeness, indicating that the advantage conferred by good exemplars is invariant to inversion. Finally, the good and bad images were analyzed using an objective estimate of image typicality, and this factor was also shown to predict observers' ability to detect the images. These results document a close relationship between natural scene categorization and detection, suggesting that rapid scene perception is strongly influenced by our experience with typical and representative environments.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-06-08T15:35:36Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Caddigan_Eamon.doc: 2950656 bytes, checksum: cde9590c75859a3db0127e4afb17a321 (MD5) Caddigan_Eamon.pdf: 1528640 bytes, checksum: 417b5edd9df51243d05cf554962a9bcc (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-09-18T21:18:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Caddigan_Eamon.pdf: 1528640 bytes, checksum: 417b5edd9df51243d05cf554962a9bcc (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: c3a27ed967b2376facaccb48a8599d3d (MD5) Caddigan_Eamon.doc: 2950656 bytes, checksum: cde9590c75859a3db0127e4afb17a321 (MD5)","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:35:05-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: 2014-09-18 16:21:01 UTC Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Seth Robbins (srobbins@illinois.edu) on 2012-09-18T21:21:10Z Item is restricted until 2014-09-18T21:21:01Z","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 34740 on 2014-09-18T10:00:47Z."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34466"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2012 Eamon Caddigan"],"dc:subject":["Scene Perception"],"dc:title":["The perception of good and bad natural scene category exemplars"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:31Z"}