{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/34402"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/34402","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Higher education association lobbying: grassroots outreach as a signal of constituent opinion","abstract":"This study sought to gain a better understanding of lobbying by the major DC-based higher education associations. To understand this phenomenon, this study looked at the lobbying tactics used by the associations and how they decide on what lobbying tactics to use. A qualitative, multiple case study approach was used with a sample comprised of association representatives and Congressional staffers. Overall, associations used a variety of tactics, but the for-profit association used more tactics and used all tactics more intensely compared to the non- profit associations. Particular focus was given to the tactic of membership mobilization using a signaling theory framework. Signaling theory explained why membership mobilization is an effective tactic because it signals to legislators that constituents care about an issue and could cause re-election consequences.","abstract_html":"This study sought to gain a better understanding of lobbying by the major DC-based higher education associations. To understand this phenomenon, this study looked at the lobbying tactics used by the associations and how they decide on what lobbying tactics to use. A qualitative, multiple case study approach was used with a sample comprised of association representatives and Congressional staffers. Overall, associations used a variety of tactics, but the for-profit association used more tactics and used all tactics more intensely compared to the non- profit associations. Particular focus was given to the tactic of membership mobilization using a signaling theory framework. Signaling theory explained why membership mobilization is an effective tactic because it signals to legislators that constituents care about an issue and could cause re-election consequences.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bennett, Stacy"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Ed Organization and Leadership","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Delaney, Jennifer A.","Baber, Lorenzo D.","Ikenberry, Stanley O.","Trent, William T."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-09-18T21:15:11Z","date_published":"2012-09-18T21:15:11Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:31Z","subjects":["higher education lobbying","lobbying tactics","membership mobilization","signaling theory, grassroots"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2012 Stacy Bennett"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34402","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Delaney, Jennifer A.","Baber, Lorenzo D.","Ikenberry, Stanley O.","Trent, William T."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bennett, Stacy"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-09-18T21:15:11Z","2012-08"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Ed Organization and Leadership"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["higher education lobbying","lobbying tactics","membership mobilization","signaling theory, grassroots"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2012 Stacy Bennett"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34402"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This study sought to gain a better understanding of lobbying by the major DC-based higher education associations. To understand this phenomenon, this study looked at the lobbying tactics used by the associations and how they decide on what lobbying tactics to use. A qualitative, multiple case study approach was used with a sample comprised of association representatives and Congressional staffers. Overall, associations used a variety of tactics, but the for-profit association used more tactics and used all tactics more intensely compared to the non- profit associations. Particular focus was given to the tactic of membership mobilization using a signaling theory framework. Signaling theory explained why membership mobilization is an effective tactic because it signals to legislators that constituents care about an issue and could cause re-election consequences.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-07-02T16:10:33Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Bennett_Stacy.docx: 1134835 bytes, checksum: 974edb5e128e9d8e6dea68925003f6b7 (MD5) Bennett_Stacy.pdf: 1948855 bytes, checksum: cb2b61bbe80bbe9aee896f6927b0dc45 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-09-18T21:15:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Bennett_Stacy.pdf: 1954848 bytes, checksum: fa580e57869cf33667d94f392d6319c3 (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: b16229ca236cb0270d60c52839056273 (MD5) Bennett_Stacy.docx: 1135015 bytes, checksum: 38d1682d5e710488bf11d398d74e78e6 (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Higher education association lobbying: grassroots outreach as a signal of constituent opinion"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Delaney, Jennifer A.","Baber, Lorenzo D.","Ikenberry, Stanley O.","Trent, William T."],"dc:creator":["Bennett, Stacy"],"dc:date":["2012-09-18T21:15:11Z","2012-08"],"dc:description":["This study sought to gain a better understanding of lobbying by the major DC-based higher education associations. To understand this phenomenon, this study looked at the lobbying tactics used by the associations and how they decide on what lobbying tactics to use. A qualitative, multiple case study approach was used with a sample comprised of association representatives and Congressional staffers. Overall, associations used a variety of tactics, but the for-profit association used more tactics and used all tactics more intensely compared to the non- profit associations. Particular focus was given to the tactic of membership mobilization using a signaling theory framework. Signaling theory explained why membership mobilization is an effective tactic because it signals to legislators that constituents care about an issue and could cause re-election consequences.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-07-02T16:10:33Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Bennett_Stacy.docx: 1134835 bytes, checksum: 974edb5e128e9d8e6dea68925003f6b7 (MD5) Bennett_Stacy.pdf: 1948855 bytes, checksum: cb2b61bbe80bbe9aee896f6927b0dc45 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-09-18T21:15:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Bennett_Stacy.pdf: 1954848 bytes, checksum: fa580e57869cf33667d94f392d6319c3 (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: b16229ca236cb0270d60c52839056273 (MD5) Bennett_Stacy.docx: 1135015 bytes, checksum: 38d1682d5e710488bf11d398d74e78e6 (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34402"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2012 Stacy Bennett"],"dc:subject":["higher education lobbying","lobbying tactics","membership mobilization","signaling theory, grassroots"],"dc:title":["Higher education association lobbying: grassroots outreach as a signal of constituent opinion"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Ed Organization and Leadership"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:31Z"}