{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/34348"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/34348","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The role of reflective functioning in predicting parenting and coparenting quality","abstract":"This investigation examined the validity of parental reflective functioning (RF; Fonagy, Target, Steele, & Steele, 1998) which is a measure designed to assess understanding of emotions and other mental states. RF was coded based on the prebirth Adult Attachment Interviews (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985). Parenting and coparenting quality were assessed 13 months after the birth of the target child. Correlational and factor analyses indicated considerable overlap between RF and traditional AAI coding. Exploratory factor analyses of RF and AAI state of mind scales indicated that RF loaded, along with coherence of mind, on the primary factor distinguishing between individuals categorized as secure and dismissing. Maternal RF significantly predicted paternal dyadic sensitivity and coparenting quality and marginally predicted maternal dyadic and paternal triadic sensitivity. Paternal RF did not predict parenting quality. Interestingly, fathers’ RF predicted coparenting quality of daughters, and mothers’ RF predicted coparenting quality of sons. These findings indicate that the RF measure is an important predictor of family functioning and warrants further investigation.","abstract_html":"This investigation examined the validity of parental reflective functioning (RF; Fonagy, Target, Steele, & Steele, 1998) which is a measure designed to assess understanding of emotions and other mental states. RF was coded based on the prebirth Adult Attachment Interviews (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985). Parenting and coparenting quality were assessed 13 months after the birth of the target child. Correlational and factor analyses indicated considerable overlap between RF and traditional AAI coding. Exploratory factor analyses of RF and AAI state of mind scales indicated that RF loaded, along with coherence of mind, on the primary factor distinguishing between individuals categorized as secure and dismissing. Maternal RF significantly predicted paternal dyadic sensitivity and coparenting quality and marginally predicted maternal dyadic and paternal triadic sensitivity. Paternal RF did not predict parenting quality. Interestingly, fathers’ RF predicted coparenting quality of daughters, and mothers’ RF predicted coparenting quality of sons. These findings indicate that the RF measure is an important predictor of family functioning and warrants further investigation.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Jessee, Allison"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Mangelsdorf, Sarah C.","Roisman, Glenn I.","McElwain, Nancy L.","Ostler, Teresa A.","Bost, Kelly"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-09-18T21:12:38Z","date_published":"2012-09-18T21:12:38Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:31Z","subjects":["reflective functioning","parenting","coparenting","family studies","infancy"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2012 Allison Jessee"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34348","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Mangelsdorf, Sarah C.","Roisman, Glenn I.","McElwain, Nancy L.","Ostler, Teresa A.","Bost, Kelly"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Jessee, Allison"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-09-18T21:12:38Z","2012-08"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["reflective functioning","parenting","coparenting","family studies","infancy"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2012 Allison Jessee"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34348"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This investigation examined the validity of parental reflective functioning (RF; Fonagy, Target, Steele, & Steele, 1998) which is a measure designed to assess understanding of emotions and other mental states. RF was coded based on the prebirth Adult Attachment Interviews (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985). Parenting and coparenting quality were assessed 13 months after the birth of the target child. Correlational and factor analyses indicated considerable overlap between RF and traditional AAI coding. Exploratory factor analyses of RF and AAI state of mind scales indicated that RF loaded, along with coherence of mind, on the primary factor distinguishing between individuals categorized as secure and dismissing. Maternal RF significantly predicted paternal dyadic sensitivity and coparenting quality and marginally predicted maternal dyadic and paternal triadic sensitivity. Paternal RF did not predict parenting quality. Interestingly, fathers’ RF predicted coparenting quality of daughters, and mothers’ RF predicted coparenting quality of sons. These findings indicate that the RF measure is an important predictor of family functioning and warrants further investigation.","Item withdrawn by Alexis Thompson (athmpsn1@illinois.edu) on 2012-05-31T18:41:07Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Jessee_Allison.pdf: 282054 bytes, checksum: a2c1c610da9bea49958f4e7275ac9dd4 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-09-18T21:12:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Jessee_Allison.pdf: 396488 bytes, checksum: 0dfa63a839f8ad9a451c527f911a185c (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: 157bd3477557d278792b3747fb0ba3db (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The role of reflective functioning in predicting parenting and coparenting quality"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Mangelsdorf, Sarah C.","Roisman, Glenn I.","McElwain, Nancy L.","Ostler, Teresa A.","Bost, Kelly"],"dc:creator":["Jessee, Allison"],"dc:date":["2012-09-18T21:12:38Z","2012-08"],"dc:description":["This investigation examined the validity of parental reflective functioning (RF; Fonagy, Target, Steele, & Steele, 1998) which is a measure designed to assess understanding of emotions and other mental states. RF was coded based on the prebirth Adult Attachment Interviews (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985). Parenting and coparenting quality were assessed 13 months after the birth of the target child. Correlational and factor analyses indicated considerable overlap between RF and traditional AAI coding. Exploratory factor analyses of RF and AAI state of mind scales indicated that RF loaded, along with coherence of mind, on the primary factor distinguishing between individuals categorized as secure and dismissing. Maternal RF significantly predicted paternal dyadic sensitivity and coparenting quality and marginally predicted maternal dyadic and paternal triadic sensitivity. Paternal RF did not predict parenting quality. Interestingly, fathers’ RF predicted coparenting quality of daughters, and mothers’ RF predicted coparenting quality of sons. These findings indicate that the RF measure is an important predictor of family functioning and warrants further investigation.","Item withdrawn by Alexis Thompson (athmpsn1@illinois.edu) on 2012-05-31T18:41:07Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Jessee_Allison.pdf: 282054 bytes, checksum: a2c1c610da9bea49958f4e7275ac9dd4 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-09-18T21:12:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Jessee_Allison.pdf: 396488 bytes, checksum: 0dfa63a839f8ad9a451c527f911a185c (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: 157bd3477557d278792b3747fb0ba3db (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34348"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2012 Allison Jessee"],"dc:subject":["reflective functioning","parenting","coparenting","family studies","infancy"],"dc:title":["The role of reflective functioning in predicting parenting and coparenting quality"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:31Z"}