{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/34236"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/34236","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Lane keeping under cognitive distractions: performance and mechanisms","abstract":"Cognitive distractions while driving often reduce the variability of lane position. However, data do not make clear whether smaller lane variability should be interpreted as a performance loss, indicating rigidified or unresponsive steering response to external stimuli, or a performance improvement in lane-keeping, indicating better lateral control. Four hypotheses, rigidified steering, visual enhancement, lateral prioritization, and automatic steering, debated on the performance implications and mechanisms of smaller lane variability under cognitive distractions. This dissertation project compares these hypotheses, and explores two important questions: first, whether the smaller lane variability under cognitive distraction indicates a performance loss or a performance gain in lane-keeping; second, what is the underlying cognitive mechanisms of lane variability reduction. Three studies have been carried out to assess drivers’ responsiveness to heavy lateral winds under varying levels of cognitive load. Data showed that cognitive load reduced the variability of lane position but increased the variability of vehicle speed, engendering more frequent steering activity but less frequent speed manipulation. Cognitive load also increased the coherence, or coupling between steering wheel position and lateral wind strength. More interestingly, distracted drivers produced quicker steering response time to the sudden onset of lateral wind. Results thus suggest that smaller lane variability under cognitive distractions is an indicator of better lane-keeping performance, and distracted drivers achieved better lane-keeping performance by actively prioritizing lateral control. Findings carry practical applications for mitigating driving risks and theoretical implications on the relationship between attention allocation and driving performance.","abstract_html":"Cognitive distractions while driving often reduce the variability of lane position. However, data do not make clear whether smaller lane variability should be interpreted as a performance loss, indicating rigidified or unresponsive steering response to external stimuli, or a performance improvement in lane-keeping, indicating better lateral control. Four hypotheses, rigidified steering, visual enhancement, lateral prioritization, and automatic steering, debated on the performance implications and mechanisms of smaller lane variability under cognitive distractions. This dissertation project compares these hypotheses, and explores two important questions: first, whether the smaller lane variability under cognitive distraction indicates a performance loss or a performance gain in lane-keeping; second, what is the underlying cognitive mechanisms of lane variability reduction. Three studies have been carried out to assess drivers’ responsiveness to heavy lateral winds under varying levels of cognitive load. Data showed that cognitive load reduced the variability of lane position but increased the variability of vehicle speed, engendering more frequent steering activity but less frequent speed manipulation. Cognitive load also increased the coherence, or coupling between steering wheel position and lateral wind strength. More interestingly, distracted drivers produced quicker steering response time to the sudden onset of lateral wind. Results thus suggest that smaller lane variability under cognitive distractions is an indicator of better lane-keeping performance, and distracted drivers achieved better lane-keeping performance by actively prioritizing lateral control. Findings carry practical applications for mitigating driving risks and theoretical implications on the relationship between attention allocation and driving performance.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["He, Jibo"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["McCarley, Jason S.","Kramer, Arthur F.","Simons, Daniel J.","Morrow, Daniel G.","Lleras, Alejandro","Horrey, William"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-09-18T21:07:17Z","date_published":"2012-09-18T21:07:17Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:30Z","subjects":["Driver Distraction","Lane Keeping","Multitasking"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2012 by Jibo He. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34236","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["McCarley, Jason S.","Kramer, Arthur F.","Simons, Daniel J.","Morrow, Daniel G.","Lleras, Alejandro","Horrey, William"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["He, Jibo"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-09-18T21:07:17Z","2012-08"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Driver Distraction","Lane Keeping","Multitasking"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2012 by Jibo He. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34236"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Cognitive distractions while driving often reduce the variability of lane position. However, data do not make clear whether smaller lane variability should be interpreted as a performance loss, indicating rigidified or unresponsive steering response to external stimuli, or a performance improvement in lane-keeping, indicating better lateral control. Four hypotheses, rigidified steering, visual enhancement, lateral prioritization, and automatic steering, debated on the performance implications and mechanisms of smaller lane variability under cognitive distractions. This dissertation project compares these hypotheses, and explores two important questions: first, whether the smaller lane variability under cognitive distraction indicates a performance loss or a performance gain in lane-keeping; second, what is the underlying cognitive mechanisms of lane variability reduction. Three studies have been carried out to assess drivers’ responsiveness to heavy lateral winds under varying levels of cognitive load. Data showed that cognitive load reduced the variability of lane position but increased the variability of vehicle speed, engendering more frequent steering activity but less frequent speed manipulation. Cognitive load also increased the coherence, or coupling between steering wheel position and lateral wind strength. More interestingly, distracted drivers produced quicker steering response time to the sudden onset of lateral wind. Results thus suggest that smaller lane variability under cognitive distractions is an indicator of better lane-keeping performance, and distracted drivers achieved better lane-keeping performance by actively prioritizing lateral control. Findings carry practical applications for mitigating driving risks and theoretical implications on the relationship between attention allocation and driving performance.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-07-02T15:42:50Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 dissertation-driver distraction- Jun29.doc: 1056256 bytes, checksum: 26d32e1155e8406e2e4f99dc172bbff5 (MD5) He_Jibo.pdf: 1270074 bytes, checksum: 856e444dfde09c6c17a05c6614747bae (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-09-18T21:07:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 He_Jibo.pdf: 1203944 bytes, checksum: 20d824d87c696fe8f19496a662df5c8a (MD5) license.txt: 4056 bytes, checksum: fda2c8c14ad86e00c8549dcffeaa4b54 (MD5) dissertation-driver distraction- Jun29.doc: 1062912 bytes, checksum: f8acdad552bb499b2ed49fb170efcbaa (MD5) dissertation-driver distraction- Jul2.doc: 1062912 bytes, checksum: f8acdad552bb499b2ed49fb170efcbaa (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Lane keeping under cognitive distractions: performance and mechanisms"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["McCarley, Jason S.","Kramer, Arthur F.","Simons, Daniel J.","Morrow, Daniel G.","Lleras, Alejandro","Horrey, William"],"dc:creator":["He, Jibo"],"dc:date":["2012-09-18T21:07:17Z","2012-08"],"dc:description":["Cognitive distractions while driving often reduce the variability of lane position. However, data do not make clear whether smaller lane variability should be interpreted as a performance loss, indicating rigidified or unresponsive steering response to external stimuli, or a performance improvement in lane-keeping, indicating better lateral control. Four hypotheses, rigidified steering, visual enhancement, lateral prioritization, and automatic steering, debated on the performance implications and mechanisms of smaller lane variability under cognitive distractions. This dissertation project compares these hypotheses, and explores two important questions: first, whether the smaller lane variability under cognitive distraction indicates a performance loss or a performance gain in lane-keeping; second, what is the underlying cognitive mechanisms of lane variability reduction. Three studies have been carried out to assess drivers’ responsiveness to heavy lateral winds under varying levels of cognitive load. Data showed that cognitive load reduced the variability of lane position but increased the variability of vehicle speed, engendering more frequent steering activity but less frequent speed manipulation. Cognitive load also increased the coherence, or coupling between steering wheel position and lateral wind strength. More interestingly, distracted drivers produced quicker steering response time to the sudden onset of lateral wind. Results thus suggest that smaller lane variability under cognitive distractions is an indicator of better lane-keeping performance, and distracted drivers achieved better lane-keeping performance by actively prioritizing lateral control. Findings carry practical applications for mitigating driving risks and theoretical implications on the relationship between attention allocation and driving performance.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-07-02T15:42:50Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 dissertation-driver distraction- Jun29.doc: 1056256 bytes, checksum: 26d32e1155e8406e2e4f99dc172bbff5 (MD5) He_Jibo.pdf: 1270074 bytes, checksum: 856e444dfde09c6c17a05c6614747bae (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-09-18T21:07:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 He_Jibo.pdf: 1203944 bytes, checksum: 20d824d87c696fe8f19496a662df5c8a (MD5) license.txt: 4056 bytes, checksum: fda2c8c14ad86e00c8549dcffeaa4b54 (MD5) dissertation-driver distraction- Jun29.doc: 1062912 bytes, checksum: f8acdad552bb499b2ed49fb170efcbaa (MD5) dissertation-driver distraction- Jul2.doc: 1062912 bytes, checksum: f8acdad552bb499b2ed49fb170efcbaa (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/34236"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2012 by Jibo He. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["Driver Distraction","Lane Keeping","Multitasking"],"dc:title":["Lane keeping under cognitive distractions: performance and mechanisms"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:30Z"}