{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/32081"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/32081","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Writing against democracy: anarchist literature and the aporia of representation, 1880-1940","abstract":"This dissertation proposes “anarchist literature” as both a generic classification and a methodological orientation toward the overlapping fields of American literature and democratic politics. By expanding the boundaries of both literature and anarchism, it offers an important supplement to accounts of American literature between the Civil War and WWII. The defining characteristic of anarchist “texts” is their conflicted relationship to government and representation. Late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century American anarchists took as their object of critique U. S. democracy, a tenuously, yet aspiringly representative form of governance. As U. S. government moved unevenly toward more complete electoral representation, anarchists questioned the validity of all forms of state power, in ways ranging from the dramatic assassination of a sitting president to the subtle permeation of anti-government thought into a wide range of texts. This project argues that representative democracy is only the most obvious face of a more comprehensive “logic of representation”: a structuring desire to re-present—to make known the absent subjects of politics and literature—which during this period folded multiple registers of representation back into the nation and its governance. This logic produces the aporia of representation, a paradox that has obscured the era’s widespread fascination with anti-government politics. By recovering a fractured, yet sustained tradition of anarchist literature, this study reveals the difficulties inherent in writing against the American democratic ideal and the paradox of critiquing governmental representationality through representational literary forms: anarchism appears as a formal conflict within a range of discourses, exposing the sublimated political unrest produced by the nation’s incomplete democracy.","abstract_html":"This dissertation proposes “anarchist literature” as both a generic classification and a methodological orientation toward the overlapping fields of American literature and democratic politics. By expanding the boundaries of both literature and anarchism, it offers an important supplement to accounts of American literature between the Civil War and WWII. The defining characteristic of anarchist “texts” is their conflicted relationship to government and representation. Late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century American anarchists took as their object of critique U. S. democracy, a tenuously, yet aspiringly representative form of governance. As U. S. government moved unevenly toward more complete electoral representation, anarchists questioned the validity of all forms of state power, in ways ranging from the dramatic assassination of a sitting president to the subtle permeation of anti-government thought into a wide range of texts. This project argues that representative democracy is only the most obvious face of a more comprehensive “logic of representation”: a structuring desire to re-present—to make known the absent subjects of politics and literature—which during this period folded multiple registers of representation back into the nation and its governance. This logic produces the aporia of representation, a paradox that has obscured the era’s widespread fascination with anti-government politics. By recovering a fractured, yet sustained tradition of anarchist literature, this study reveals the difficulties inherent in writing against the American democratic ideal and the paradox of critiquing governmental representationality through representational literary forms: anarchism appears as a formal conflict within a range of discourses, exposing the sublimated political unrest produced by the nation’s incomplete democracy.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Colson, Daniel"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"English","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Wald, Alan","Marsh, John E.","Foote, Stephanie","Newcomb, Tim","Nelson, Cary"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-06-27T21:32:02Z","date_published":"2012-06-27T21:32:02Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:30Z","subjects":["Literature","anarchism"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2012 Daniel Colson"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/32081","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Wald, Alan","Marsh, John E.","Foote, Stephanie","Newcomb, Tim","Nelson, Cary"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Colson, Daniel"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-06-27T21:32:02Z","2014-06-28T10:00:29Z","2012-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["English"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Literature","anarchism"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2012 Daniel Colson"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/32081"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This dissertation proposes “anarchist literature” as both a generic classification and a methodological orientation toward the overlapping fields of American literature and democratic politics. By expanding the boundaries of both literature and anarchism, it offers an important supplement to accounts of American literature between the Civil War and WWII. The defining characteristic of anarchist “texts” is their conflicted relationship to government and representation. Late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century American anarchists took as their object of critique U. S. democracy, a tenuously, yet aspiringly representative form of governance. As U. S. government moved unevenly toward more complete electoral representation, anarchists questioned the validity of all forms of state power, in ways ranging from the dramatic assassination of a sitting president to the subtle permeation of anti-government thought into a wide range of texts. This project argues that representative democracy is only the most obvious face of a more comprehensive “logic of representation”: a structuring desire to re-present—to make known the absent subjects of politics and literature—which during this period folded multiple registers of representation back into the nation and its governance. This logic produces the aporia of representation, a paradox that has obscured the era’s widespread fascination with anti-government politics. By recovering a fractured, yet sustained tradition of anarchist literature, this study reveals the difficulties inherent in writing against the American democratic ideal and the paradox of critiquing governmental representationality through representational literary forms: anarchism appears as a formal conflict within a range of discourses, exposing the sublimated political unrest produced by the nation’s incomplete democracy.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-04-02T20:56:08Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Colson_Daniel.pdf: 1372264 bytes, checksum: 739b8170a935ebfd997563a2f3ddc734 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-06-27T21:32:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Colson_Daniel.pdf: 1372230 bytes, checksum: e9dd64aefe824972fb4a8be9115af505 (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: 1707d865e0561ce8067eed45357cd17d (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2012-06-27T21:32:51Z Item is restricted until 2014-06-27T21:32:23Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:29Z Item was in collections: Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - English (ID: 447) No. of bitstreams: 2 Colson_Daniel.pdf: 1372230 bytes, checksum: e9dd64aefe824972fb4a8be9115af505 (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: 1707d865e0561ce8067eed45357cd17d (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:29Z"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Writing against democracy: anarchist literature and the aporia of representation, 1880-1940"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Wald, Alan","Marsh, John E.","Foote, Stephanie","Newcomb, Tim","Nelson, Cary"],"dc:creator":["Colson, Daniel"],"dc:date":["2012-06-27T21:32:02Z","2014-06-28T10:00:29Z","2012-05"],"dc:description":["This dissertation proposes “anarchist literature” as both a generic classification and a methodological orientation toward the overlapping fields of American literature and democratic politics. By expanding the boundaries of both literature and anarchism, it offers an important supplement to accounts of American literature between the Civil War and WWII. The defining characteristic of anarchist “texts” is their conflicted relationship to government and representation. Late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century American anarchists took as their object of critique U. S. democracy, a tenuously, yet aspiringly representative form of governance. As U. S. government moved unevenly toward more complete electoral representation, anarchists questioned the validity of all forms of state power, in ways ranging from the dramatic assassination of a sitting president to the subtle permeation of anti-government thought into a wide range of texts. This project argues that representative democracy is only the most obvious face of a more comprehensive “logic of representation”: a structuring desire to re-present—to make known the absent subjects of politics and literature—which during this period folded multiple registers of representation back into the nation and its governance. This logic produces the aporia of representation, a paradox that has obscured the era’s widespread fascination with anti-government politics. By recovering a fractured, yet sustained tradition of anarchist literature, this study reveals the difficulties inherent in writing against the American democratic ideal and the paradox of critiquing governmental representationality through representational literary forms: anarchism appears as a formal conflict within a range of discourses, exposing the sublimated political unrest produced by the nation’s incomplete democracy.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-04-02T20:56:08Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Colson_Daniel.pdf: 1372264 bytes, checksum: 739b8170a935ebfd997563a2f3ddc734 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-06-27T21:32:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Colson_Daniel.pdf: 1372230 bytes, checksum: e9dd64aefe824972fb4a8be9115af505 (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: 1707d865e0561ce8067eed45357cd17d (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2012-06-27T21:32:51Z Item is restricted until 2014-06-27T21:32:23Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:29Z Item was in collections: Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - English (ID: 447) No. of bitstreams: 2 Colson_Daniel.pdf: 1372230 bytes, checksum: e9dd64aefe824972fb4a8be9115af505 (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: 1707d865e0561ce8067eed45357cd17d (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:29Z"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/32081"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2012 Daniel Colson"],"dc:subject":["Literature","anarchism"],"dc:title":["Writing against democracy: anarchist literature and the aporia of representation, 1880-1940"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["English"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:30Z"}