{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/32067"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/32067","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Reason and care: constructing an inclusive moral theory for civic education","abstract":"ABSTRACT My thesis tackles the debate regarding (in)compatibility of rational moral philosophy and caring theory. My thesis argues and demonstrates that by unifying Noddings’ caring theory with ethic(s) of care presented by scholars from social and political science, in both practice and relational ground, the new caring theory not only is compatible with rational moral philosophy, but is also more inclusive and capable to face the challenges derived from the modern information technologies age. My thesis first identifies four core components presented by various caring theorists and then integrates them into a neocaring theory. These four components are caring nature, caring as activity, contextuality or motivation replacement, and relational ontology. Second, I apply both Merleau-Ponty’s theory of intersubjectivity and Nāgārjuna’s philosophy of dependent co-arising to bridge the gap between Noddindgs’ scaring theory and Tront-Hankivsky’s interconnection and interdependent nature. This new relational ground or relational ontology, therefore, is expanded to embrace three characteristics of human existence: first, the fabric of human existence is the synthesized field of subjectivity and objectivity, the public and the private, as well as rationality and affectivity; second, human life is an ongoing process of becoming and synthesizing; and third, humans and sociopolitical activity are interconnected with and interdependent on each other, and thereby, they are mutually conditioned and supplementary . Based on the four core components and three characteristics of neocaring theory, I construct a neocaring theory of autonomy, and meanwhile demonstrate the way in which Kant’s moral autonomy is included in this new theory. In the final chapter, I conclude my thesis by showing the differences that the neocaring theory of autonomy can make compared to that of Kant and neoliberalism with respect to tackling problems emerging from the modern digital age, and administrating higher education, respectively. Lastly, my thesis shows the way in which moral education will affect our society and the formation of citizenship, and the way in which the neocaring theory of autonomy can help to nurture students’ caring mind with reflecting on the interdependent nature of human existence to become a positive netizen in the digital age.","abstract_html":"ABSTRACT My thesis tackles the debate regarding (in)compatibility of rational moral philosophy and caring theory. My thesis argues and demonstrates that by unifying Noddings’ caring theory with ethic(s) of care presented by scholars from social and political science, in both practice and relational ground, the new caring theory not only is compatible with rational moral philosophy, but is also more inclusive and capable to face the challenges derived from the modern information technologies age. My thesis first identifies four core components presented by various caring theorists and then integrates them into a neocaring theory. These four components are caring nature, caring as activity, contextuality or motivation replacement, and relational ontology. Second, I apply both Merleau-Ponty’s theory of intersubjectivity and Nāgārjuna’s philosophy of dependent co-arising to bridge the gap between Noddindgs’ scaring theory and Tront-Hankivsky’s interconnection and interdependent nature. This new relational ground or relational ontology, therefore, is expanded to embrace three characteristics of human existence: first, the fabric of human existence is the synthesized field of subjectivity and objectivity, the public and the private, as well as rationality and affectivity; second, human life is an ongoing process of becoming and synthesizing; and third, humans and sociopolitical activity are interconnected with and interdependent on each other, and thereby, they are mutually conditioned and supplementary . Based on the four core components and three characteristics of neocaring theory, I construct a neocaring theory of autonomy, and meanwhile demonstrate the way in which Kant’s moral autonomy is included in this new theory. In the final chapter, I conclude my thesis by showing the differences that the neocaring theory of autonomy can make compared to that of Kant and neoliberalism with respect to tackling problems emerging from the modern digital age, and administrating higher education, respectively. Lastly, my thesis shows the way in which moral education will affect our society and the formation of citizenship, and the way in which the neocaring theory of autonomy can help to nurture students’ caring mind with reflecting on the interdependent nature of human existence to become a positive netizen in the digital age.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lin, Yueh-Mei"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educational Policy Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dhillon, Pradeep A.","Melnick, Arthur","Span, Christopher M.","Pandharipande, Rajeshwari V.","Higgins, Christopher R."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-06-27T21:31:20Z","date_published":"2012-06-27T21:31:20Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:30Z","subjects":["caring theory","rational moral philosophy","compatibility","relational ontology","Merleau-Ponty’s and Nāgārjuna’s philosophies","unified neocaring theory of autonomy","information technologies","digital age"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2012 Yueh-Mei Lin"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/32067","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dhillon, Pradeep A.","Melnick, Arthur","Span, Christopher M.","Pandharipande, Rajeshwari V.","Higgins, Christopher R."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lin, Yueh-Mei"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-06-27T21:31:20Z","2014-06-28T10:00:28Z","2012-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Policy Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["caring theory","rational moral philosophy","compatibility","relational ontology","Merleau-Ponty’s and Nāgārjuna’s philosophies","unified neocaring theory of autonomy","information technologies","digital age"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2012 Yueh-Mei Lin"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/32067"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["ABSTRACT My thesis tackles the debate regarding (in)compatibility of rational moral philosophy and caring theory. My thesis argues and demonstrates that by unifying Noddings’ caring theory with ethic(s) of care presented by scholars from social and political science, in both practice and relational ground, the new caring theory not only is compatible with rational moral philosophy, but is also more inclusive and capable to face the challenges derived from the modern information technologies age. My thesis first identifies four core components presented by various caring theorists and then integrates them into a neocaring theory. These four components are caring nature, caring as activity, contextuality or motivation replacement, and relational ontology. Second, I apply both Merleau-Ponty’s theory of intersubjectivity and Nāgārjuna’s philosophy of dependent co-arising to bridge the gap between Noddindgs’ scaring theory and Tront-Hankivsky’s interconnection and interdependent nature. This new relational ground or relational ontology, therefore, is expanded to embrace three characteristics of human existence: first, the fabric of human existence is the synthesized field of subjectivity and objectivity, the public and the private, as well as rationality and affectivity; second, human life is an ongoing process of becoming and synthesizing; and third, humans and sociopolitical activity are interconnected with and interdependent on each other, and thereby, they are mutually conditioned and supplementary . Based on the four core components and three characteristics of neocaring theory, I construct a neocaring theory of autonomy, and meanwhile demonstrate the way in which Kant’s moral autonomy is included in this new theory. In the final chapter, I conclude my thesis by showing the differences that the neocaring theory of autonomy can make compared to that of Kant and neoliberalism with respect to tackling problems emerging from the modern digital age, and administrating higher education, respectively. Lastly, my thesis shows the way in which moral education will affect our society and the formation of citizenship, and the way in which the neocaring theory of autonomy can help to nurture students’ caring mind with reflecting on the interdependent nature of human existence to become a positive netizen in the digital age.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-04-13T18:13:08Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 393538 bytes, checksum: aa2849a9a7e09499f179f5c3daab0ca1 (MD5) Lin_Yueh-Mei.pdf: 1242968 bytes, checksum: 5ec505be1f8bca122aeec2cdf4ba9157 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-06-27T21:31:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 5 Lin_Yueh-Mei.pdf: 1228195 bytes, checksum: 0f489dc220a152a3300dec079f0e532a (MD5) license.txt: 4055 bytes, checksum: 05e9ec90e925cf73e8ff52cafc992a7b (MD5) Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 393538 bytes, checksum: aa2849a9a7e09499f179f5c3daab0ca1 (MD5) 1_Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 389450 bytes, checksum: 23cc9da2ddf92b7d7d3987b858bbdd4b (MD5) 2_Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 389450 bytes, checksum: 23cc9da2ddf92b7d7d3987b858bbdd4b (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2012-06-27T21:32:48Z Item is restricted until 2014-06-27T21:32:23Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:28Z Item was in collections: Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - College of Education (ID: 434) No. of bitstreams: 5 Lin_Yueh-Mei.pdf: 1228195 bytes, checksum: 0f489dc220a152a3300dec079f0e532a (MD5) license.txt: 4055 bytes, checksum: 05e9ec90e925cf73e8ff52cafc992a7b (MD5) Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 393538 bytes, checksum: aa2849a9a7e09499f179f5c3daab0ca1 (MD5) 1_Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 389450 bytes, checksum: 23cc9da2ddf92b7d7d3987b858bbdd4b (MD5) 2_Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 389450 bytes, checksum: 23cc9da2ddf92b7d7d3987b858bbdd4b (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:28Z"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Reason and care: constructing an inclusive moral theory for civic education"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dhillon, Pradeep A.","Melnick, Arthur","Span, Christopher M.","Pandharipande, Rajeshwari V.","Higgins, Christopher R."],"dc:creator":["Lin, Yueh-Mei"],"dc:date":["2012-06-27T21:31:20Z","2014-06-28T10:00:28Z","2012-05"],"dc:description":["ABSTRACT My thesis tackles the debate regarding (in)compatibility of rational moral philosophy and caring theory. My thesis argues and demonstrates that by unifying Noddings’ caring theory with ethic(s) of care presented by scholars from social and political science, in both practice and relational ground, the new caring theory not only is compatible with rational moral philosophy, but is also more inclusive and capable to face the challenges derived from the modern information technologies age. My thesis first identifies four core components presented by various caring theorists and then integrates them into a neocaring theory. These four components are caring nature, caring as activity, contextuality or motivation replacement, and relational ontology. Second, I apply both Merleau-Ponty’s theory of intersubjectivity and Nāgārjuna’s philosophy of dependent co-arising to bridge the gap between Noddindgs’ scaring theory and Tront-Hankivsky’s interconnection and interdependent nature. This new relational ground or relational ontology, therefore, is expanded to embrace three characteristics of human existence: first, the fabric of human existence is the synthesized field of subjectivity and objectivity, the public and the private, as well as rationality and affectivity; second, human life is an ongoing process of becoming and synthesizing; and third, humans and sociopolitical activity are interconnected with and interdependent on each other, and thereby, they are mutually conditioned and supplementary . Based on the four core components and three characteristics of neocaring theory, I construct a neocaring theory of autonomy, and meanwhile demonstrate the way in which Kant’s moral autonomy is included in this new theory. In the final chapter, I conclude my thesis by showing the differences that the neocaring theory of autonomy can make compared to that of Kant and neoliberalism with respect to tackling problems emerging from the modern digital age, and administrating higher education, respectively. Lastly, my thesis shows the way in which moral education will affect our society and the formation of citizenship, and the way in which the neocaring theory of autonomy can help to nurture students’ caring mind with reflecting on the interdependent nature of human existence to become a positive netizen in the digital age.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-04-13T18:13:08Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 393538 bytes, checksum: aa2849a9a7e09499f179f5c3daab0ca1 (MD5) Lin_Yueh-Mei.pdf: 1242968 bytes, checksum: 5ec505be1f8bca122aeec2cdf4ba9157 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-06-27T21:31:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 5 Lin_Yueh-Mei.pdf: 1228195 bytes, checksum: 0f489dc220a152a3300dec079f0e532a (MD5) license.txt: 4055 bytes, checksum: 05e9ec90e925cf73e8ff52cafc992a7b (MD5) Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 393538 bytes, checksum: aa2849a9a7e09499f179f5c3daab0ca1 (MD5) 1_Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 389450 bytes, checksum: 23cc9da2ddf92b7d7d3987b858bbdd4b (MD5) 2_Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 389450 bytes, checksum: 23cc9da2ddf92b7d7d3987b858bbdd4b (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2012-06-27T21:32:48Z Item is restricted until 2014-06-27T21:32:23Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:28Z Item was in collections: Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - College of Education (ID: 434) No. of bitstreams: 5 Lin_Yueh-Mei.pdf: 1228195 bytes, checksum: 0f489dc220a152a3300dec079f0e532a (MD5) license.txt: 4055 bytes, checksum: 05e9ec90e925cf73e8ff52cafc992a7b (MD5) Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 393538 bytes, checksum: aa2849a9a7e09499f179f5c3daab0ca1 (MD5) 1_Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 389450 bytes, checksum: 23cc9da2ddf92b7d7d3987b858bbdd4b (MD5) 2_Lin_Yueh-Mei.docx: 389450 bytes, checksum: 23cc9da2ddf92b7d7d3987b858bbdd4b (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:28Z"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/32067"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2012 Yueh-Mei Lin"],"dc:subject":["caring theory","rational moral philosophy","compatibility","relational ontology","Merleau-Ponty’s and Nāgārjuna’s philosophies","unified neocaring theory of autonomy","information technologies","digital age"],"dc:title":["Reason and care: constructing an inclusive moral theory for civic education"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Policy Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:30Z"}