{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/31958"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/31958","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Laggard strategy: why a firm is sometimes better off lagging the technology frontier","abstract":"This dissertation focuses on using organizational capabilities and the anticipated economic payoff from innovation to explain and predict the dynamics of a technological laggard's behavior. The firm capabilities research that focuses on organizational capabilities suggests that a technological laggard has to innovate, while the competitive dynamics research focuses on the anticipated economic payoff that a technological laggard can gain from innovating. Together, the central hypothesis in this dissertation is that a firm is more likely to remain a technological laggard if doing so enables the firm to better utilize its current organizational capabilities, and if it anticipates a better economic payoff by remaining a technological laggard than by becoming a technological leader in innovation. A technological laggard chooses to move to the technology frontier when it has the capabilities to realize the anticipated economic payoff. Using panel data from the flat panel display industry for the 1991-2008 period, I empirically corroborate the hypothesis. This dissertation provides a more complete picture than the extant literature of a technological laggard's behavior by combining the firm capabilities research with competitive dynamics research.","abstract_html":"This dissertation focuses on using organizational capabilities and the anticipated economic payoff from innovation to explain and predict the dynamics of a technological laggard's behavior. The firm capabilities research that focuses on organizational capabilities suggests that a technological laggard has to innovate, while the competitive dynamics research focuses on the anticipated economic payoff that a technological laggard can gain from innovating. Together, the central hypothesis in this dissertation is that a firm is more likely to remain a technological laggard if doing so enables the firm to better utilize its current organizational capabilities, and if it anticipates a better economic payoff by remaining a technological laggard than by becoming a technological leader in innovation. A technological laggard chooses to move to the technology frontier when it has the capabilities to realize the anticipated economic payoff. Using panel data from the flat panel display industry for the 1991-2008 period, I empirically corroborate the hypothesis. This dissertation provides a more complete picture than the extant literature of a technological laggard's behavior by combining the firm capabilities research with competitive dynamics research.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wang, I-Chen"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Business Administration","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Hoetker, Glenn P.","Mahoney, Joseph T.","Bercovitz, Janet E.L.","Echambadi, Rajagopal"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-06-27T21:21:27Z","date_published":"2012-06-27T21:21:27Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:30Z","subjects":["technological laggards","technological capabilities","competitive dynamics"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["technological laggards, technological capabilities, competitive dynamics"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/31958","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Hoetker, Glenn P.","Mahoney, Joseph T.","Bercovitz, Janet E.L.","Echambadi, Rajagopal"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wang, I-Chen"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-06-27T21:21:27Z","2014-06-28T10:00:21Z","2012-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Business Administration"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["technological laggards","technological capabilities","competitive dynamics"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["technological laggards, technological capabilities, competitive dynamics"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/31958"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This dissertation focuses on using organizational capabilities and the anticipated economic payoff from innovation to explain and predict the dynamics of a technological laggard's behavior. The firm capabilities research that focuses on organizational capabilities suggests that a technological laggard has to innovate, while the competitive dynamics research focuses on the anticipated economic payoff that a technological laggard can gain from innovating. Together, the central hypothesis in this dissertation is that a firm is more likely to remain a technological laggard if doing so enables the firm to better utilize its current organizational capabilities, and if it anticipates a better economic payoff by remaining a technological laggard than by becoming a technological leader in innovation. A technological laggard chooses to move to the technology frontier when it has the capabilities to realize the anticipated economic payoff. Using panel data from the flat panel display industry for the 1991-2008 period, I empirically corroborate the hypothesis. This dissertation provides a more complete picture than the extant literature of a technological laggard's behavior by combining the firm capabilities research with competitive dynamics research.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-04-16T21:07:06Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Wang_I-Chen.docx: 613850 bytes, checksum: 38bb78cbe6e1e7a2f52ce1488fabf80e (MD5) Wang_I-Chen.pdf: 1435294 bytes, checksum: 1c2fbbc97f0c64b38e22ba25e84eea00 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-06-27T21:21:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Wang_I-Chen.pdf: 1438319 bytes, checksum: a9cda2c5db012ee9e8d186580aed94e4 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 8663059726c4b57ebd128936b9e8e568 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2012-06-27T21:24:39Z Item is restricted until 2014-06-27T21:24:27Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:21Z Item was in collections: Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - Business Administration (ID: 677) No. of bitstreams: 2 Wang_I-Chen.pdf: 1438319 bytes, checksum: a9cda2c5db012ee9e8d186580aed94e4 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 8663059726c4b57ebd128936b9e8e568 (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:21Z"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Laggard strategy: why a firm is sometimes better off lagging the technology frontier"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Hoetker, Glenn P.","Mahoney, Joseph T.","Bercovitz, Janet E.L.","Echambadi, Rajagopal"],"dc:creator":["Wang, I-Chen"],"dc:date":["2012-06-27T21:21:27Z","2014-06-28T10:00:21Z","2012-05"],"dc:description":["This dissertation focuses on using organizational capabilities and the anticipated economic payoff from innovation to explain and predict the dynamics of a technological laggard's behavior. The firm capabilities research that focuses on organizational capabilities suggests that a technological laggard has to innovate, while the competitive dynamics research focuses on the anticipated economic payoff that a technological laggard can gain from innovating. Together, the central hypothesis in this dissertation is that a firm is more likely to remain a technological laggard if doing so enables the firm to better utilize its current organizational capabilities, and if it anticipates a better economic payoff by remaining a technological laggard than by becoming a technological leader in innovation. A technological laggard chooses to move to the technology frontier when it has the capabilities to realize the anticipated economic payoff. Using panel data from the flat panel display industry for the 1991-2008 period, I empirically corroborate the hypothesis. This dissertation provides a more complete picture than the extant literature of a technological laggard's behavior by combining the firm capabilities research with competitive dynamics research.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-04-16T21:07:06Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Wang_I-Chen.docx: 613850 bytes, checksum: 38bb78cbe6e1e7a2f52ce1488fabf80e (MD5) Wang_I-Chen.pdf: 1435294 bytes, checksum: 1c2fbbc97f0c64b38e22ba25e84eea00 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-06-27T21:21:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Wang_I-Chen.pdf: 1438319 bytes, checksum: a9cda2c5db012ee9e8d186580aed94e4 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 8663059726c4b57ebd128936b9e8e568 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2012-06-27T21:24:39Z Item is restricted until 2014-06-27T21:24:27Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:21Z Item was in collections: Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - Business Administration (ID: 677) No. of bitstreams: 2 Wang_I-Chen.pdf: 1438319 bytes, checksum: a9cda2c5db012ee9e8d186580aed94e4 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 8663059726c4b57ebd128936b9e8e568 (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-06-28T10:00:21Z"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/31958"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["technological laggards, technological capabilities, competitive dynamics"],"dc:subject":["technological laggards","technological capabilities","competitive dynamics"],"dc:title":["Laggard strategy: why a firm is sometimes better off lagging the technology frontier"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Business Administration"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:30Z"}