{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/31189"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/31189","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Audit committee's propensity to challenge significant accounting estimates: the joint effects of audit report content and investor type","abstract":"Drawing on two perspectives of accountability theory, this dissertation experimentally examines the joint effect of audit report content and investor type (i.e., primary shareholders of the firm) on audit committee members’ propensity to challenge management’s significant accounting estimates. Findings indicate that audit committee members engage in the highest level of questioning when sophisticated investors are the primary shareholders of the firm and a standard, unqualified audit report is issued with no additional information about management’s significant accounting estimate. By contrast, their questioning level is significantly lower when unsophisticated investors are the primary shareholders of the firm and/or when the audit report includes an explanatory paragraph about management’s significant accounting estimate. Further analysis suggests this pattern of results is more pronounced for audit committee members who are designated as financial experts. These findings have implications in terms of both research and practice inasmuch as facets of a recent PCAOB Exposure Draft advocates for widespread and required usage of explanatory paragraphs in audit reports that, herein, decrease audit committee’s propensity to challenge management and/or auditors.","abstract_html":"Drawing on two perspectives of accountability theory, this dissertation experimentally examines the joint effect of audit report content and investor type (i.e., primary shareholders of the firm) on audit committee members’ propensity to challenge management’s significant accounting estimates. Findings indicate that audit committee members engage in the highest level of questioning when sophisticated investors are the primary shareholders of the firm and a standard, unqualified audit report is issued with no additional information about management’s significant accounting estimate. By contrast, their questioning level is significantly lower when unsophisticated investors are the primary shareholders of the firm and/or when the audit report includes an explanatory paragraph about management’s significant accounting estimate. Further analysis suggests this pattern of results is more pronounced for audit committee members who are designated as financial experts. These findings have implications in terms of both research and practice inasmuch as facets of a recent PCAOB Exposure Draft advocates for widespread and required usage of explanatory paragraphs in audit reports that, herein, decrease audit committee’s propensity to challenge management and/or auditors.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kang, Yoon Ju"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Accountancy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Pomeroy, Bradley","Peecher, Mark E.","Trotman, Ken","Elliott, W. Brooke","Viswanathan, Madhubalan"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-05-22T00:34:23Z","date_published":"2012-05-22T00:34:23Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:30Z","subjects":["audit committee","audit committee effectiveness","Accountability","audit report","investor type"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2012 Yoon Ju Kang"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/31189","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Pomeroy, Bradley","Peecher, Mark E.","Trotman, Ken","Elliott, W. Brooke","Viswanathan, Madhubalan"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kang, Yoon Ju"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-05-22T00:34:23Z","2012-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Accountancy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["audit committee","audit committee effectiveness","Accountability","audit report","investor type"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2012 Yoon Ju Kang"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/31189"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Drawing on two perspectives of accountability theory, this dissertation experimentally examines the joint effect of audit report content and investor type (i.e., primary shareholders of the firm) on audit committee members’ propensity to challenge management’s significant accounting estimates. Findings indicate that audit committee members engage in the highest level of questioning when sophisticated investors are the primary shareholders of the firm and a standard, unqualified audit report is issued with no additional information about management’s significant accounting estimate. By contrast, their questioning level is significantly lower when unsophisticated investors are the primary shareholders of the firm and/or when the audit report includes an explanatory paragraph about management’s significant accounting estimate. Further analysis suggests this pattern of results is more pronounced for audit committee members who are designated as financial experts. These findings have implications in terms of both research and practice inasmuch as facets of a recent PCAOB Exposure Draft advocates for widespread and required usage of explanatory paragraphs in audit reports that, herein, decrease audit committee’s propensity to challenge management and/or auditors.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-04-12T15:14:59Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Kang_Yoon Ju.pdf.pdf: 583810 bytes, checksum: 59decb0e553fe2f93b6aa92854bbc0ae (MD5) Kang_Yoon Ju.pdf: 583810 bytes, checksum: 59decb0e553fe2f93b6aa92854bbc0ae (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-05-22T00:34:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Kang_YoonJu.pdf: 525484 bytes, checksum: 250aa336091c665c400d564e83ebaa08 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 197cd850cb9c95e6772f92a491f583c9 (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Audit committee's propensity to challenge significant accounting estimates: the joint effects of audit report content and investor type"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Pomeroy, Bradley","Peecher, Mark E.","Trotman, Ken","Elliott, W. Brooke","Viswanathan, Madhubalan"],"dc:creator":["Kang, Yoon Ju"],"dc:date":["2012-05-22T00:34:23Z","2012-05"],"dc:description":["Drawing on two perspectives of accountability theory, this dissertation experimentally examines the joint effect of audit report content and investor type (i.e., primary shareholders of the firm) on audit committee members’ propensity to challenge management’s significant accounting estimates. Findings indicate that audit committee members engage in the highest level of questioning when sophisticated investors are the primary shareholders of the firm and a standard, unqualified audit report is issued with no additional information about management’s significant accounting estimate. By contrast, their questioning level is significantly lower when unsophisticated investors are the primary shareholders of the firm and/or when the audit report includes an explanatory paragraph about management’s significant accounting estimate. Further analysis suggests this pattern of results is more pronounced for audit committee members who are designated as financial experts. These findings have implications in terms of both research and practice inasmuch as facets of a recent PCAOB Exposure Draft advocates for widespread and required usage of explanatory paragraphs in audit reports that, herein, decrease audit committee’s propensity to challenge management and/or auditors.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2012-04-12T15:14:59Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Kang_Yoon Ju.pdf.pdf: 583810 bytes, checksum: 59decb0e553fe2f93b6aa92854bbc0ae (MD5) Kang_Yoon Ju.pdf: 583810 bytes, checksum: 59decb0e553fe2f93b6aa92854bbc0ae (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-05-22T00:34:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Kang_YoonJu.pdf: 525484 bytes, checksum: 250aa336091c665c400d564e83ebaa08 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 197cd850cb9c95e6772f92a491f583c9 (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/31189"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2012 Yoon Ju Kang"],"dc:subject":["audit committee","audit committee effectiveness","Accountability","audit report","investor type"],"dc:title":["Audit committee's propensity to challenge significant accounting estimates: the joint effects of audit report content and investor type"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Accountancy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:30Z"}