{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/29777"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/29777","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The effects of grammatical structure and feelings of power on risk behavior prevention","abstract":"The strategic use of questions and assertions within an interpersonal interaction can indicate and alter the relative power levels of each dyad member. The current research examined the effect of grammatical category (question vs. assertion) on the outcomes of an interaction in which one member is designated to help the other change a risky behavior. In two studies, participants were primed to feel powerful or powerless via a writing task and then matched by assigned power condition to act as the provider (powerful) or recipient (powerless) of help regarding binge drinking. Study 1 established that powerful subjects express stronger intentions to engage in risky behavior when they make statements, but powerless subjects intend to act riskiest when they ask questions. Study 2 tested the hypothesis that questions are particularly risky for powerless participants because they encourage biased recall, which simultaneously influences perceived subjective norms.","abstract_html":"The strategic use of questions and assertions within an interpersonal interaction can indicate and alter the relative power levels of each dyad member. The current research examined the effect of grammatical category (question vs. assertion) on the outcomes of an interaction in which one member is designated to help the other change a risky behavior. In two studies, participants were primed to feel powerful or powerless via a writing task and then matched by assigned power condition to act as the provider (powerful) or recipient (powerless) of help regarding binge drinking. Study 1 established that powerful subjects express stronger intentions to engage in risky behavior when they make statements, but powerless subjects intend to act riskiest when they ask questions. Study 2 tested the hypothesis that questions are particularly risky for powerless participants because they encourage biased recall, which simultaneously influences perceived subjective norms.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Tannenbaum, Melanie"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Albarracin, Dolores"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-02-06T20:16:00Z","date_published":"2012-02-06T20:16:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:29Z","subjects":["Risk behavior","persuasion","power","syntax"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2011 Melanie Tannenbaum"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29777","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Albarracin, Dolores"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Tannenbaum, Melanie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-02-06T20:16:00Z","2011-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation / Thesis","text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Risk behavior","persuasion","power","syntax"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2011 Melanie Tannenbaum"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29777"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The strategic use of questions and assertions within an interpersonal interaction can indicate and alter the relative power levels of each dyad member. The current research examined the effect of grammatical category (question vs. assertion) on the outcomes of an interaction in which one member is designated to help the other change a risky behavior. In two studies, participants were primed to feel powerful or powerless via a writing task and then matched by assigned power condition to act as the provider (powerful) or recipient (powerless) of help regarding binge drinking. Study 1 established that powerful subjects express stronger intentions to engage in risky behavior when they make statements, but powerless subjects intend to act riskiest when they ask questions. Study 2 tested the hypothesis that questions are particularly risky for powerless participants because they encourage biased recall, which simultaneously influences perceived subjective norms.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-12-06T21:10:07Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 MA_Final_120211.doc: 661504 bytes, checksum: 34240e03e4f9470c7ab99b7708eaa5e3 (MD5) Tannenbaum_Melanie.pdf: 113405 bytes, checksum: f041f64a8324e6ef8b6c2796645f6082 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-02-06T20:16:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Tannenbaum_Melanie.pdf: 1388396 bytes, checksum: 5a023bf10293670397eb24efffe0e982 (MD5) license.txt: 4068 bytes, checksum: 43930c78a2f0843da337623990f3b519 (MD5) MA_Final_120211.doc: 663552 bytes, checksum: 5995c4b7d5cf0833e62224c71e7e33eb (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The effects of grammatical structure and feelings of power on risk behavior prevention"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Albarracin, Dolores"],"dc:creator":["Tannenbaum, Melanie"],"dc:date":["2012-02-06T20:16:00Z","2011-12"],"dc:description":["The strategic use of questions and assertions within an interpersonal interaction can indicate and alter the relative power levels of each dyad member. The current research examined the effect of grammatical category (question vs. assertion) on the outcomes of an interaction in which one member is designated to help the other change a risky behavior. In two studies, participants were primed to feel powerful or powerless via a writing task and then matched by assigned power condition to act as the provider (powerful) or recipient (powerless) of help regarding binge drinking. Study 1 established that powerful subjects express stronger intentions to engage in risky behavior when they make statements, but powerless subjects intend to act riskiest when they ask questions. Study 2 tested the hypothesis that questions are particularly risky for powerless participants because they encourage biased recall, which simultaneously influences perceived subjective norms.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-12-06T21:10:07Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 MA_Final_120211.doc: 661504 bytes, checksum: 34240e03e4f9470c7ab99b7708eaa5e3 (MD5) Tannenbaum_Melanie.pdf: 113405 bytes, checksum: f041f64a8324e6ef8b6c2796645f6082 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-02-06T20:16:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Tannenbaum_Melanie.pdf: 1388396 bytes, checksum: 5a023bf10293670397eb24efffe0e982 (MD5) license.txt: 4068 bytes, checksum: 43930c78a2f0843da337623990f3b519 (MD5) MA_Final_120211.doc: 663552 bytes, checksum: 5995c4b7d5cf0833e62224c71e7e33eb (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29777"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2011 Melanie Tannenbaum"],"dc:subject":["Risk behavior","persuasion","power","syntax"],"dc:title":["The effects of grammatical structure and feelings of power on risk behavior prevention"],"dc:type":["Dissertation / Thesis","text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:29Z"}