{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/29655"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/29655","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Trading solidarity for environmentality: subject formation and intimate government of forests in Kaolack Region, Senegal","abstract":"Community-based natural resource management projects widely fail to meet their stated goals. But what do such interventions and policies actually achieve? How do they alter the practices and consciousness of the people whom they involve in management? Drawing on work on environmentality, this thesis examines the legacy of a community-based natural resource management project in Kaolack Region, Senegal. Prior to the project, residents of this region subtlety and collectively refused to comply with state forest regulation, relying on widespread solidarity to avoid being caught and sanctioned by the forest service. However, this situation changed in the 1990s with the arrival of a project known as PAGERNA. As residents became implicated in forest management, some began to develop environmental subjectivities: new ideas of self-interest and commitment to environmental protection. After the close of PAGERNA, these environmental subjectivities led certain residents to collaborate with local government officials and the forest service in order to enforce new restrictions on forest use. Management after the project took the form of a regime of “intimate government,” in which communities regulated themselves, working with state authorities. However, not all rural residents adopted environmentalist values. Some complied with restrictions only because their activities were closely monitored. Others, residents of the poorest villages, continued to resist regulation. However, these resistors found that in the new regime environmentality had replaced solidarity; they were sanctioned by village guards and government foresters. The case of Kaolack reveals how subject formation shapes the long-term legacy of natural resource policies and projects. It shows how management systems are constituted by multiple subjectivities and how rural residents are controlled through multiple mechanisms of rule. The thesis argues that, rather than focusing on single outcomes, we must examine heterogeneous changes in people’s practices, identities, and relationships with institutions.","abstract_html":"Community-based natural resource management projects widely fail to meet their stated goals. But what do such interventions and policies actually achieve? How do they alter the practices and consciousness of the people whom they involve in management? Drawing on work on environmentality, this thesis examines the legacy of a community-based natural resource management project in Kaolack Region, Senegal. Prior to the project, residents of this region subtlety and collectively refused to comply with state forest regulation, relying on widespread solidarity to avoid being caught and sanctioned by the forest service. However, this situation changed in the 1990s with the arrival of a project known as PAGERNA. As residents became implicated in forest management, some began to develop environmental subjectivities: new ideas of self-interest and commitment to environmental protection. After the close of PAGERNA, these environmental subjectivities led certain residents to collaborate with local government officials and the forest service in order to enforce new restrictions on forest use. Management after the project took the form of a regime of “intimate government,” in which communities regulated themselves, working with state authorities. However, not all rural residents adopted environmentalist values. Some complied with restrictions only because their activities were closely monitored. Others, residents of the poorest villages, continued to resist regulation. However, these resistors found that in the new regime environmentality had replaced solidarity; they were sanctioned by village guards and government foresters. The case of Kaolack reveals how subject formation shapes the long-term legacy of natural resource policies and projects. It shows how management systems are constituted by multiple subjectivities and how rural residents are controlled through multiple mechanisms of rule. The thesis argues that, rather than focusing on single outcomes, we must examine heterogeneous changes in people’s practices, identities, and relationships with institutions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Robinson, Ewan S."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Geography","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Chhatre, Ashwini"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-02-06T20:09:05Z","date_published":"2012-02-06T20:09:05Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:27Z","subjects":["community-based natural resource management","development projects - long-term impacts","decentralization","governmentality","subjectivities","Senegal"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2011 Ewan S. Robinson"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29655","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Chhatre, Ashwini"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Robinson, Ewan S."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-02-06T20:09:05Z","2011-12"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Geography"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["community-based natural resource management","development projects - long-term impacts","decentralization","governmentality","subjectivities","Senegal"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2011 Ewan S. Robinson"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29655"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Community-based natural resource management projects widely fail to meet their stated goals. But what do such interventions and policies actually achieve? How do they alter the practices and consciousness of the people whom they involve in management? Drawing on work on environmentality, this thesis examines the legacy of a community-based natural resource management project in Kaolack Region, Senegal. Prior to the project, residents of this region subtlety and collectively refused to comply with state forest regulation, relying on widespread solidarity to avoid being caught and sanctioned by the forest service. However, this situation changed in the 1990s with the arrival of a project known as PAGERNA. As residents became implicated in forest management, some began to develop environmental subjectivities: new ideas of self-interest and commitment to environmental protection. After the close of PAGERNA, these environmental subjectivities led certain residents to collaborate with local government officials and the forest service in order to enforce new restrictions on forest use. Management after the project took the form of a regime of “intimate government,” in which communities regulated themselves, working with state authorities. However, not all rural residents adopted environmentalist values. Some complied with restrictions only because their activities were closely monitored. Others, residents of the poorest villages, continued to resist regulation. However, these resistors found that in the new regime environmentality had replaced solidarity; they were sanctioned by village guards and government foresters. The case of Kaolack reveals how subject formation shapes the long-term legacy of natural resource policies and projects. It shows how management systems are constituted by multiple subjectivities and how rural residents are controlled through multiple mechanisms of rule. The thesis argues that, rather than focusing on single outcomes, we must examine heterogeneous changes in people’s practices, identities, and relationships with institutions.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-07-22T11:50:02Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Robinson_Ewan.doc: 668672 bytes, checksum: 92ca16d11fe1e42969898548ede863f8 (MD5) Robinson_Ewan.pdf: 1021953 bytes, checksum: 8d8803be78f688a26fcf88441fda713d (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-02-06T20:09:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Robinson_Ewan.pdf: 1021953 bytes, checksum: 8d8803be78f688a26fcf88441fda713d (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: 64ebc9ec528175acdcf0c3c5e65f1429 (MD5) Robinson_Ewan.doc: 668672 bytes, checksum: 92ca16d11fe1e42969898548ede863f8 (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Trading solidarity for environmentality: subject formation and intimate government of forests in Kaolack Region, Senegal"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Chhatre, Ashwini"],"dc:creator":["Robinson, Ewan S."],"dc:date":["2012-02-06T20:09:05Z","2011-12"],"dc:description":["Community-based natural resource management projects widely fail to meet their stated goals. But what do such interventions and policies actually achieve? How do they alter the practices and consciousness of the people whom they involve in management? Drawing on work on environmentality, this thesis examines the legacy of a community-based natural resource management project in Kaolack Region, Senegal. Prior to the project, residents of this region subtlety and collectively refused to comply with state forest regulation, relying on widespread solidarity to avoid being caught and sanctioned by the forest service. However, this situation changed in the 1990s with the arrival of a project known as PAGERNA. As residents became implicated in forest management, some began to develop environmental subjectivities: new ideas of self-interest and commitment to environmental protection. After the close of PAGERNA, these environmental subjectivities led certain residents to collaborate with local government officials and the forest service in order to enforce new restrictions on forest use. Management after the project took the form of a regime of “intimate government,” in which communities regulated themselves, working with state authorities. However, not all rural residents adopted environmentalist values. Some complied with restrictions only because their activities were closely monitored. Others, residents of the poorest villages, continued to resist regulation. However, these resistors found that in the new regime environmentality had replaced solidarity; they were sanctioned by village guards and government foresters. The case of Kaolack reveals how subject formation shapes the long-term legacy of natural resource policies and projects. It shows how management systems are constituted by multiple subjectivities and how rural residents are controlled through multiple mechanisms of rule. The thesis argues that, rather than focusing on single outcomes, we must examine heterogeneous changes in people’s practices, identities, and relationships with institutions.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-07-22T11:50:02Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Robinson_Ewan.doc: 668672 bytes, checksum: 92ca16d11fe1e42969898548ede863f8 (MD5) Robinson_Ewan.pdf: 1021953 bytes, checksum: 8d8803be78f688a26fcf88441fda713d (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-02-06T20:09:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Robinson_Ewan.pdf: 1021953 bytes, checksum: 8d8803be78f688a26fcf88441fda713d (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: 64ebc9ec528175acdcf0c3c5e65f1429 (MD5) Robinson_Ewan.doc: 668672 bytes, checksum: 92ca16d11fe1e42969898548ede863f8 (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29655"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2011 Ewan S. Robinson"],"dc:subject":["community-based natural resource management","development projects - long-term impacts","decentralization","governmentality","subjectivities","Senegal"],"dc:title":["Trading solidarity for environmentality: subject formation and intimate government of forests in Kaolack Region, Senegal"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Geography"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:27Z"}