{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/29567"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/29567","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Validation of power system transient stability results","abstract":"Simulation of the transient stability problem of a power system, which is the assessment of the short term angular and voltage stability of the system following a disturbance, is of vital importance. It is widely known in the industry that different transient stability packages can give substantially different results for the same (or at least similar) system models. The goal of this work is to develop validation methodologies for different transient stability software packages with a focus on Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) system models. We discuss two specific approaches developed and implemented to validate the transient stability results. The sources of discrepancies seen in the results from different packages are investigated. This enables us to identify the differences in the implementation of dynamic models in different transient stability softwares. In this process, we present certain key analyses of the WECC system models for different contingencies.","abstract_html":"Simulation of the transient stability problem of a power system, which is the assessment of the short term angular and voltage stability of the system following a disturbance, is of vital importance. It is widely known in the industry that different transient stability packages can give substantially different results for the same (or at least similar) system models. The goal of this work is to develop validation methodologies for different transient stability software packages with a focus on Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) system models. We discuss two specific approaches developed and implemented to validate the transient stability results. The sources of discrepancies seen in the results from different packages are investigated. This enables us to identify the differences in the implementation of dynamic models in different transient stability softwares. In this process, we present certain key analyses of the WECC system models for different contingencies.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Shetye, Komal"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Electrical & Computer Engr","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Overbye, Thomas J."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-02-01T00:55:47Z","date_published":"2012-02-01T00:55:47Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:27Z","subjects":["Power System Stability","Transient Stability","Validation"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2011 Komal Shetye"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29567","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Overbye, Thomas J."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Shetye, Komal"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-02-01T00:55:47Z","2014-02-01T11:00:34Z","2011-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation / Thesis","text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Electrical & Computer Engr"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Power System Stability","Transient Stability","Validation"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2011 Komal Shetye"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29567"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Simulation of the transient stability problem of a power system, which is the assessment of the short term angular and voltage stability of the system following a disturbance, is of vital importance. It is widely known in the industry that different transient stability packages can give substantially different results for the same (or at least similar) system models. The goal of this work is to develop validation methodologies for different transient stability software packages with a focus on Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) system models. We discuss two specific approaches developed and implemented to validate the transient stability results. The sources of discrepancies seen in the results from different packages are investigated. This enables us to identify the differences in the implementation of dynamic models in different transient stability softwares. In this process, we present certain key analyses of the WECC system models for different contingencies.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-11-29T23:19:41Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Komal-Shetye_Thesis.docx: 9267608 bytes, checksum: 957923f2e730af7e19b05d7cdc0189c7 (MD5) Shetye_Komal.pdf: 2571617 bytes, checksum: 85e309095ff5b64daa5f87127415fca8 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-02-01T00:55:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Shetye_Komal.pdf: 2571617 bytes, checksum: 85e309095ff5b64daa5f87127415fca8 (MD5) license.txt: 4061 bytes, checksum: 0725168da541ce4f10d2d9375d75f43a (MD5) Komal-Shetye_Thesis.docx: 9267608 bytes, checksum: 957923f2e730af7e19b05d7cdc0189c7 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2012-02-01T00:57:20Z Item is restricted until 2014-02-01T00:56:58Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-02-01T11:00:34Z Item was in collections: Dissertations and Theses - Electrical and Computer Engineering (ID: 446) Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois (ID: 204) No. of bitstreams: 3 Shetye_Komal.pdf: 2571617 bytes, checksum: 85e309095ff5b64daa5f87127415fca8 (MD5) license.txt: 4061 bytes, checksum: 0725168da541ce4f10d2d9375d75f43a (MD5) Komal-Shetye_Thesis.docx: 9267608 bytes, checksum: 957923f2e730af7e19b05d7cdc0189c7 (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-02-01T11:00:34Z"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Validation of power system transient stability results"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Overbye, Thomas J."],"dc:creator":["Shetye, Komal"],"dc:date":["2012-02-01T00:55:47Z","2014-02-01T11:00:34Z","2011-12"],"dc:description":["Simulation of the transient stability problem of a power system, which is the assessment of the short term angular and voltage stability of the system following a disturbance, is of vital importance. It is widely known in the industry that different transient stability packages can give substantially different results for the same (or at least similar) system models. The goal of this work is to develop validation methodologies for different transient stability software packages with a focus on Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) system models. We discuss two specific approaches developed and implemented to validate the transient stability results. The sources of discrepancies seen in the results from different packages are investigated. This enables us to identify the differences in the implementation of dynamic models in different transient stability softwares. In this process, we present certain key analyses of the WECC system models for different contingencies.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-11-29T23:19:41Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Komal-Shetye_Thesis.docx: 9267608 bytes, checksum: 957923f2e730af7e19b05d7cdc0189c7 (MD5) Shetye_Komal.pdf: 2571617 bytes, checksum: 85e309095ff5b64daa5f87127415fca8 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-02-01T00:55:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Shetye_Komal.pdf: 2571617 bytes, checksum: 85e309095ff5b64daa5f87127415fca8 (MD5) license.txt: 4061 bytes, checksum: 0725168da541ce4f10d2d9375d75f43a (MD5) Komal-Shetye_Thesis.docx: 9267608 bytes, checksum: 957923f2e730af7e19b05d7cdc0189c7 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2012-02-01T00:57:20Z Item is restricted until 2014-02-01T00:56:58Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-02-01T11:00:34Z Item was in collections: Dissertations and Theses - Electrical and Computer Engineering (ID: 446) Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois (ID: 204) No. of bitstreams: 3 Shetye_Komal.pdf: 2571617 bytes, checksum: 85e309095ff5b64daa5f87127415fca8 (MD5) license.txt: 4061 bytes, checksum: 0725168da541ce4f10d2d9375d75f43a (MD5) Komal-Shetye_Thesis.docx: 9267608 bytes, checksum: 957923f2e730af7e19b05d7cdc0189c7 (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-02-01T11:00:34Z"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29567"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2011 Komal Shetye"],"dc:subject":["Power System Stability","Transient Stability","Validation"],"dc:title":["Validation of power system transient stability results"],"dc:type":["Dissertation / Thesis","text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Electrical & Computer Engr"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:27Z"}