{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/29538"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/29538","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Clarifying the concept of disease: how science determines the biologically normal from the abnormal","abstract":"This is an investigation of the modern concept of disease and an explication of the concept consistent with scientific and medical usage. The core notion involved in the modern concept of disease (taken broadly as pathology) is biological abnormality in form or function, for a circumscribed biological system, contrasted against a theoretical sense of normal form or function. Chapter 2 presents an overview of science, its products and how these are produced. This sketch is limited and intended only to clarify my own view of science in as far as this is important for the main thesis. Chapter 3 discusses the concepts of normality and abnormality, particularly as it is used in biomedical science. I argue that science offers a theoretical sense of abnormality importantly different from statistical or conventional senses of abnormality. Chapter 4 begins with an examination of the normativist /naturalist debate on the concept of disease. I then offer my explication of disease and the criteria necessary for a disease claim to be legitimate. Chapter 4 closes with an extended discussion of interesting and controversial examples of disease claims aimed at clarifying and challenging my own position.","abstract_html":"This is an investigation of the modern concept of disease and an explication of the concept consistent with scientific and medical usage. The core notion involved in the modern concept of disease (taken broadly as pathology) is biological abnormality in form or function, for a circumscribed biological system, contrasted against a theoretical sense of normal form or function. Chapter 2 presents an overview of science, its products and how these are produced. This sketch is limited and intended only to clarify my own view of science in as far as this is important for the main thesis. Chapter 3 discusses the concepts of normality and abnormality, particularly as it is used in biomedical science. I argue that science offers a theoretical sense of abnormality importantly different from statistical or conventional senses of abnormality. Chapter 4 begins with an examination of the normativist /naturalist debate on the concept of disease. I then offer my explication of disease and the criteria necessary for a disease claim to be legitimate. Chapter 4 closes with an extended discussion of interesting and controversial examples of disease claims aimed at clarifying and challenging my own position.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Zech, Loren"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Philosophy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Wengert, Robert G.","Wallace, James D.","Waskan, Jonathan","DeRenzo, Evan"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-02-01T00:54:29Z","date_published":"2012-02-01T00:54:29Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:27Z","subjects":["disease","normal","pathology","social construction","philosophy of medicine"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["© 2011 Loren A. Zech"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29538","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Wengert, Robert G.","Wallace, James D.","Waskan, Jonathan","DeRenzo, Evan"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Zech, Loren"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2012-02-01T00:54:29Z","2014-02-01T11:00:23Z","2011-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation / Thesis","text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["disease","normal","pathology","social construction","philosophy of medicine"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© 2011 Loren A. Zech"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29538"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This is an investigation of the modern concept of disease and an explication of the concept consistent with scientific and medical usage. The core notion involved in the modern concept of disease (taken broadly as pathology) is biological abnormality in form or function, for a circumscribed biological system, contrasted against a theoretical sense of normal form or function. Chapter 2 presents an overview of science, its products and how these are produced. This sketch is limited and intended only to clarify my own view of science in as far as this is important for the main thesis. Chapter 3 discusses the concepts of normality and abnormality, particularly as it is used in biomedical science. I argue that science offers a theoretical sense of abnormality importantly different from statistical or conventional senses of abnormality. Chapter 4 begins with an examination of the normativist /naturalist debate on the concept of disease. I then offer my explication of disease and the criteria necessary for a disease claim to be legitimate. Chapter 4 closes with an extended discussion of interesting and controversial examples of disease claims aimed at clarifying and challenging my own position.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-11-22T18:59:34Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Zech PhD thesis 11-20-11 V2-1.docx: 366344 bytes, checksum: 256a84683bfb04ebb3f4f42f9d75b91a (MD5) Zech_Loren.pdf: 1212136 bytes, checksum: 59fdca1caa50e0bb0cadf238234d4ede (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-02-01T00:54:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Zech_Loren.pdf: 1175882 bytes, checksum: e511d9efaae97d7bdca79bee09205b34 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 70605398d279e5bcb10bba4dba90b736 (MD5) Zech PhD thesis 11-20-11 V2-1.docx: 366365 bytes, checksum: 6f3ad492ed2602ee3f42f74311d1a60d (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2012-02-01T00:57:06Z Item is restricted until 2014-02-01T00:56:58Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-02-01T11:00:22Z Item was in collections: Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - Philosophy (ID: 789) No. of bitstreams: 4 Zech_Loren.pdf.txt: 594881 bytes, checksum: 8379c60b5bfc4d316d46a804746836f4 (MD5) Zech_Loren.pdf: 1175882 bytes, checksum: e511d9efaae97d7bdca79bee09205b34 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 70605398d279e5bcb10bba4dba90b736 (MD5) Zech PhD thesis 11-20-11 V2-1.docx: 366365 bytes, checksum: 6f3ad492ed2602ee3f42f74311d1a60d (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-02-01T11:00:23Z"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Clarifying the concept of disease: how science determines the biologically normal from the abnormal"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Wengert, Robert G.","Wallace, James D.","Waskan, Jonathan","DeRenzo, Evan"],"dc:creator":["Zech, Loren"],"dc:date":["2012-02-01T00:54:29Z","2014-02-01T11:00:23Z","2011-12"],"dc:description":["This is an investigation of the modern concept of disease and an explication of the concept consistent with scientific and medical usage. The core notion involved in the modern concept of disease (taken broadly as pathology) is biological abnormality in form or function, for a circumscribed biological system, contrasted against a theoretical sense of normal form or function. Chapter 2 presents an overview of science, its products and how these are produced. This sketch is limited and intended only to clarify my own view of science in as far as this is important for the main thesis. Chapter 3 discusses the concepts of normality and abnormality, particularly as it is used in biomedical science. I argue that science offers a theoretical sense of abnormality importantly different from statistical or conventional senses of abnormality. Chapter 4 begins with an examination of the normativist /naturalist debate on the concept of disease. I then offer my explication of disease and the criteria necessary for a disease claim to be legitimate. Chapter 4 closes with an extended discussion of interesting and controversial examples of disease claims aimed at clarifying and challenging my own position.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-11-22T18:59:34Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Zech PhD thesis 11-20-11 V2-1.docx: 366344 bytes, checksum: 256a84683bfb04ebb3f4f42f9d75b91a (MD5) Zech_Loren.pdf: 1212136 bytes, checksum: 59fdca1caa50e0bb0cadf238234d4ede (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2012-02-01T00:54:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Zech_Loren.pdf: 1175882 bytes, checksum: e511d9efaae97d7bdca79bee09205b34 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 70605398d279e5bcb10bba4dba90b736 (MD5) Zech PhD thesis 11-20-11 V2-1.docx: 366365 bytes, checksum: 6f3ad492ed2602ee3f42f74311d1a60d (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2012-02-01T00:57:06Z Item is restricted until 2014-02-01T00:56:58Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-02-01T11:00:22Z Item was in collections: Graduate Theses and Dissertations at Illinois (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - Philosophy (ID: 789) No. of bitstreams: 4 Zech_Loren.pdf.txt: 594881 bytes, checksum: 8379c60b5bfc4d316d46a804746836f4 (MD5) Zech_Loren.pdf: 1175882 bytes, checksum: e511d9efaae97d7bdca79bee09205b34 (MD5) license.txt: 4057 bytes, checksum: 70605398d279e5bcb10bba4dba90b736 (MD5) Zech PhD thesis 11-20-11 V2-1.docx: 366365 bytes, checksum: 6f3ad492ed2602ee3f42f74311d1a60d (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2014-02-01T11:00:23Z"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29538"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["© 2011 Loren A. Zech"],"dc:subject":["disease","normal","pathology","social construction","philosophy of medicine"],"dc:title":["Clarifying the concept of disease: how science determines the biologically normal from the abnormal"],"dc:type":["Dissertation / Thesis","text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Philosophy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:27Z"}