{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24404"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24404","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"\"Whiteness and news: the interlocking social construction of \"\"realities\"\"\"","abstract":"This dissertation examines how mainstream U.S. journalism consistently serves white racial interests and the racial status quo, or what I call white incumbency, despite its push for diversity and its stated aims to improve coverage of nonwhite communities. It is based on an in-depth ethnographic study of two daily newspapers and extensive one-on-one interviews with 61 journalists. I found that although journalists strongly identify with the need for more diverse coverage in newspapers, they emphasize individual and personal stories that avoid recognition of historical racial power imbalances, exhibiting what Ruth Frankenberg calls power-evasive race cognizance. Journalists also demonstrate a number of often contradictory identifications and self-understandings about themselves and their work, such as commitments to diversity and not taking sides, but these conflicts are almost always resolved in favor of white incumbency. Journalistic conventions and practices, such as the watchdog function and its emphasis on public institutions, routinely produce stories that replay and reinforce racial hegemony by portraying nonwhites as problems or people seeking “special privileges.” Also, journalistic repertoires about those conventions and practices avoid interrogations of journalists’ ongoing complicity in the maintenance of white incumbency.","abstract_html":"This dissertation examines how mainstream U.S. journalism consistently serves white racial interests and the racial status quo, or what I call white incumbency, despite its push for diversity and its stated aims to improve coverage of nonwhite communities. It is based on an in-depth ethnographic study of two daily newspapers and extensive one-on-one interviews with 61 journalists. I found that although journalists strongly identify with the need for more diverse coverage in newspapers, they emphasize individual and personal stories that avoid recognition of historical racial power imbalances, exhibiting what Ruth Frankenberg calls power-evasive race cognizance. Journalists also demonstrate a number of often contradictory identifications and self-understandings about themselves and their work, such as commitments to diversity and not taking sides, but these conflicts are almost always resolved in favor of white incumbency. Journalistic conventions and practices, such as the watchdog function and its emphasis on public institutions, routinely produce stories that replay and reinforce racial hegemony by portraying nonwhites as problems or people seeking “special privileges.” Also, journalistic repertoires about those conventions and practices avoid interrogations of journalists’ ongoing complicity in the maintenance of white incumbency.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Dolan, Kevin M."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Communications","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Nerone, John C.","Roediger, David R.","Christians, Clifford G.","Ono, Kent A."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-25T14:39:50Z","date_published":"2011-05-25T14:39:50Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:23Z","subjects":["Critical journalism studies","Critical whiteness studies","Journalism","Multiculturalism","White incumbency","identity","Objectivity","Diversity","Ethnography","Sociology of news"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2011 Kevin M. Dolan"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24404","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Nerone, John C.","Roediger, David R.","Christians, Clifford G.","Ono, Kent A."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Dolan, Kevin M."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-25T14:39:50Z","2013-05-26T10:00:24Z","2011-05"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Communications"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Critical journalism studies","Critical whiteness studies","Journalism","Multiculturalism","White incumbency","identity","Objectivity","Diversity","Ethnography","Sociology of news"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2011 Kevin M. Dolan"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24404"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This dissertation examines how mainstream U.S. journalism consistently serves white racial interests and the racial status quo, or what I call white incumbency, despite its push for diversity and its stated aims to improve coverage of nonwhite communities. It is based on an in-depth ethnographic study of two daily newspapers and extensive one-on-one interviews with 61 journalists. I found that although journalists strongly identify with the need for more diverse coverage in newspapers, they emphasize individual and personal stories that avoid recognition of historical racial power imbalances, exhibiting what Ruth Frankenberg calls power-evasive race cognizance. Journalists also demonstrate a number of often contradictory identifications and self-understandings about themselves and their work, such as commitments to diversity and not taking sides, but these conflicts are almost always resolved in favor of white incumbency. Journalistic conventions and practices, such as the watchdog function and its emphasis on public institutions, routinely produce stories that replay and reinforce racial hegemony by portraying nonwhites as problems or people seeking “special privileges.” Also, journalistic repertoires about those conventions and practices avoid interrogations of journalists’ ongoing complicity in the maintenance of white incumbency.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-21T18:21:45Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dolan_Kevin.pdf: 469375 bytes, checksum: aec32e5f8864f91b4901e9974c0ae04d (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T14:39:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dolan_Kevin.pdf: 464466 bytes, checksum: 07dd7f46874fa4c532ba5e41b7a01fe1 (MD5) license.txt: 4059 bytes, checksum: 5513b1bc319b016c938338808de39264 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-25T14:42:00Z Item is restricted until 2013-05-25T14:41:28Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2013-05-26T10:00:24Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Dissertations and Theses (ID: 204) Dissertations - Communications (ID: 747) No. of bitstreams: 3 Dolan_Kevin.pdf.txt: 448735 bytes, checksum: 341978403560b72f40a5eb26bc2742a9 (MD5) Dolan_Kevin.pdf: 464466 bytes, checksum: 07dd7f46874fa4c532ba5e41b7a01fe1 (MD5) license.txt: 4059 bytes, checksum: 5513b1bc319b016c938338808de39264 (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2013-05-26T10:00:24Z"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["\"Whiteness and news: the interlocking social construction of \"\"realities\"\"\""]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Nerone, John C.","Roediger, David R.","Christians, Clifford G.","Ono, Kent A."],"dc:creator":["Dolan, Kevin M."],"dc:date":["2011-05-25T14:39:50Z","2013-05-26T10:00:24Z","2011-05"],"dc:description":["This dissertation examines how mainstream U.S. journalism consistently serves white racial interests and the racial status quo, or what I call white incumbency, despite its push for diversity and its stated aims to improve coverage of nonwhite communities. It is based on an in-depth ethnographic study of two daily newspapers and extensive one-on-one interviews with 61 journalists. I found that although journalists strongly identify with the need for more diverse coverage in newspapers, they emphasize individual and personal stories that avoid recognition of historical racial power imbalances, exhibiting what Ruth Frankenberg calls power-evasive race cognizance. Journalists also demonstrate a number of often contradictory identifications and self-understandings about themselves and their work, such as commitments to diversity and not taking sides, but these conflicts are almost always resolved in favor of white incumbency. Journalistic conventions and practices, such as the watchdog function and its emphasis on public institutions, routinely produce stories that replay and reinforce racial hegemony by portraying nonwhites as problems or people seeking “special privileges.” Also, journalistic repertoires about those conventions and practices avoid interrogations of journalists’ ongoing complicity in the maintenance of white incumbency.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-21T18:21:45Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dolan_Kevin.pdf: 469375 bytes, checksum: aec32e5f8864f91b4901e9974c0ae04d (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T14:39:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dolan_Kevin.pdf: 464466 bytes, checksum: 07dd7f46874fa4c532ba5e41b7a01fe1 (MD5) license.txt: 4059 bytes, checksum: 5513b1bc319b016c938338808de39264 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-25T14:42:00Z Item is restricted until 2013-05-25T14:41:28Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2013-05-26T10:00:24Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Dissertations and Theses (ID: 204) Dissertations - Communications (ID: 747) No. of bitstreams: 3 Dolan_Kevin.pdf.txt: 448735 bytes, checksum: 341978403560b72f40a5eb26bc2742a9 (MD5) Dolan_Kevin.pdf: 464466 bytes, checksum: 07dd7f46874fa4c532ba5e41b7a01fe1 (MD5) license.txt: 4059 bytes, checksum: 5513b1bc319b016c938338808de39264 (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2013-05-26T10:00:24Z"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24404"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2011 Kevin M. Dolan"],"dc:subject":["Critical journalism studies","Critical whiteness studies","Journalism","Multiculturalism","White incumbency","identity","Objectivity","Diversity","Ethnography","Sociology of news"],"dc:title":["\"Whiteness and news: the interlocking social construction of \"\"realities\"\"\""],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Communications"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:23Z"}