{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24398"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24398","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Under what conditions are two utterances peformances of the same word?","abstract":"Starting from the fact that people sometimes use the “same” words to talk about a given topic, I want to clarify what word-sameness comes to in those uses. I will adopt an epistemic framework, in which words are primarily instruments that render the inter-subjective transfer of knowledge possible. In the course of my dissertation I refine Kaplan’s notion of words to propose an account that occupies the middle ground between (social) anti-individualism and the kind of individualism that individuates a speaker’s words without input from the speaker’s linguistic community. I make the case that speakers keep track of the various performances of a given word w via a mental register. According to my proposal, the conceptions the speaker comes to associate with her mental register over time may play a role in whether we ought to identify her idiolectal word w with the public word w’. I will argue that in the end we must leave it up to the speaker’s own (informed) judgment whether she interprets her word w as repeating a particular public word w’. According to Kaplan the individual speaker’s word w is referentially bound to the public word w’ through her intentions to repeat w’. I stress that the intention to repeat her own words w trumps the intention to repeat the word w’ produced by some other speaker. I attempt to solve Kripke’s Paderewski puzzle and problems of self-knowledge by arguing that the speaker cannot be wrong about how she keeps track of her own words.","abstract_html":"Starting from the fact that people sometimes use the “same” words to talk about a given topic, I want to clarify what word-sameness comes to in those uses. I will adopt an epistemic framework, in which words are primarily instruments that render the inter-subjective transfer of knowledge possible. In the course of my dissertation I refine Kaplan’s notion of words to propose an account that occupies the middle ground between (social) anti-individualism and the kind of individualism that individuates a speaker’s words without input from the speaker’s linguistic community. I make the case that speakers keep track of the various performances of a given word w via a mental register. According to my proposal, the conceptions the speaker comes to associate with her mental register over time may play a role in whether we ought to identify her idiolectal word w with the public word w’. I will argue that in the end we must leave it up to the speaker’s own (informed) judgment whether she interprets her word w as repeating a particular public word w’. According to Kaplan the individual speaker’s word w is referentially bound to the public word w’ through her intentions to repeat w’. I stress that the intention to repeat her own words w trumps the intention to repeat the word w’ produced by some other speaker. I attempt to solve Kripke’s Paderewski puzzle and problems of self-knowledge by arguing that the speaker cannot be wrong about how she keeps track of her own words.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Morasch, Nathalie"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Philosophy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Ebbs, Gary","Wagner, Steven J.","McCarthy, Timothy G.","Lasersohn, Peter N."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-25T14:38:52Z","date_published":"2011-05-25T14:38:52Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:23Z","subjects":["Kaplan","words","anti-individualism","Kripke puzzle","self-knowledge"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["© Copyright 2011 Nathalie Morasch"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24398","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Ebbs, Gary","Wagner, Steven J.","McCarthy, Timothy G.","Lasersohn, Peter N."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Morasch, Nathalie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-25T14:38:52Z","2013-05-26T10:00:24Z","2011-05"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Kaplan","words","anti-individualism","Kripke puzzle","self-knowledge"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["© Copyright 2011 Nathalie Morasch"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24398"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Starting from the fact that people sometimes use the “same” words to talk about a given topic, I want to clarify what word-sameness comes to in those uses. I will adopt an epistemic framework, in which words are primarily instruments that render the inter-subjective transfer of knowledge possible. In the course of my dissertation I refine Kaplan’s notion of words to propose an account that occupies the middle ground between (social) anti-individualism and the kind of individualism that individuates a speaker’s words without input from the speaker’s linguistic community. I make the case that speakers keep track of the various performances of a given word w via a mental register. According to my proposal, the conceptions the speaker comes to associate with her mental register over time may play a role in whether we ought to identify her idiolectal word w with the public word w’. I will argue that in the end we must leave it up to the speaker’s own (informed) judgment whether she interprets her word w as repeating a particular public word w’. According to Kaplan the individual speaker’s word w is referentially bound to the public word w’ through her intentions to repeat w’. I stress that the intention to repeat her own words w trumps the intention to repeat the word w’ produced by some other speaker. I attempt to solve Kripke’s Paderewski puzzle and problems of self-knowledge by arguing that the speaker cannot be wrong about how she keeps track of her own words.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-21T13:34:19Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Morasch_Nathalie.docx: 895948 bytes, checksum: 9cb6f88e63a0cbbc1f58300afac7b752 (MD5) Morasch_Nathalie.pdf: 1505343 bytes, checksum: d14478cae38265ea419d2cdc29c7b6bc (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T14:38:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Morasch_Nathalie.pdf: 1509309 bytes, checksum: 57a0cf82f671a8312cb0c425513771e1 (MD5) Morasch_Nathalie.docx: 895571 bytes, checksum: d4784750e8ee7a1e9302dc45c5251ec6 (MD5) license.txt: 4062 bytes, checksum: 04a1930c6e5c4d83c228793d0660972a (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-25T14:41:52Z Item is restricted until 2013-05-25T14:41:28Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2013-05-26T10:00:24Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Dissertations and Theses (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - Philosophy (ID: 789) No. of bitstreams: 3 Morasch_Nathalie.pdf: 1509309 bytes, checksum: 57a0cf82f671a8312cb0c425513771e1 (MD5) Morasch_Nathalie.docx: 895571 bytes, checksum: d4784750e8ee7a1e9302dc45c5251ec6 (MD5) license.txt: 4062 bytes, checksum: 04a1930c6e5c4d83c228793d0660972a (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2013-05-26T10:00:24Z"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Under what conditions are two utterances peformances of the same word?"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Ebbs, Gary","Wagner, Steven J.","McCarthy, Timothy G.","Lasersohn, Peter N."],"dc:creator":["Morasch, Nathalie"],"dc:date":["2011-05-25T14:38:52Z","2013-05-26T10:00:24Z","2011-05"],"dc:description":["Starting from the fact that people sometimes use the “same” words to talk about a given topic, I want to clarify what word-sameness comes to in those uses. I will adopt an epistemic framework, in which words are primarily instruments that render the inter-subjective transfer of knowledge possible. In the course of my dissertation I refine Kaplan’s notion of words to propose an account that occupies the middle ground between (social) anti-individualism and the kind of individualism that individuates a speaker’s words without input from the speaker’s linguistic community. I make the case that speakers keep track of the various performances of a given word w via a mental register. According to my proposal, the conceptions the speaker comes to associate with her mental register over time may play a role in whether we ought to identify her idiolectal word w with the public word w’. I will argue that in the end we must leave it up to the speaker’s own (informed) judgment whether she interprets her word w as repeating a particular public word w’. According to Kaplan the individual speaker’s word w is referentially bound to the public word w’ through her intentions to repeat w’. I stress that the intention to repeat her own words w trumps the intention to repeat the word w’ produced by some other speaker. I attempt to solve Kripke’s Paderewski puzzle and problems of self-knowledge by arguing that the speaker cannot be wrong about how she keeps track of her own words.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-21T13:34:19Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Morasch_Nathalie.docx: 895948 bytes, checksum: 9cb6f88e63a0cbbc1f58300afac7b752 (MD5) Morasch_Nathalie.pdf: 1505343 bytes, checksum: d14478cae38265ea419d2cdc29c7b6bc (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T14:38:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Morasch_Nathalie.pdf: 1509309 bytes, checksum: 57a0cf82f671a8312cb0c425513771e1 (MD5) Morasch_Nathalie.docx: 895571 bytes, checksum: d4784750e8ee7a1e9302dc45c5251ec6 (MD5) license.txt: 4062 bytes, checksum: 04a1930c6e5c4d83c228793d0660972a (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-25T14:41:52Z Item is restricted until 2013-05-25T14:41:28Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2013-05-26T10:00:24Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Dissertations and Theses (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - Philosophy (ID: 789) No. of bitstreams: 3 Morasch_Nathalie.pdf: 1509309 bytes, checksum: 57a0cf82f671a8312cb0c425513771e1 (MD5) Morasch_Nathalie.docx: 895571 bytes, checksum: d4784750e8ee7a1e9302dc45c5251ec6 (MD5) license.txt: 4062 bytes, checksum: 04a1930c6e5c4d83c228793d0660972a (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2013-05-26T10:00:24Z"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24398"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["© Copyright 2011 Nathalie Morasch"],"dc:subject":["Kaplan","words","anti-individualism","Kripke puzzle","self-knowledge"],"dc:title":["Under what conditions are two utterances peformances of the same word?"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Philosophy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:23Z"}