{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24313"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24313","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Canonical views of objects and scenes","abstract":"People frequently encounter and interact with objects and scenes from various vantage points in everyday life. The present set of studies explored canonical viewpoints in objects and scenes. Three themes were focused on: First, what the actual preferred views are for objects verses scenes; second, whether those preferred views lead to better encoding and/or recognition; and third, how different types of tasks affect both the canonical view for objects and scenes as well as whether training/testing at canonical views affects performance. Experiments 1-3 demonstrated that people have distinct viewing preferences, even across different tasks, for objects (oblique and more level) and scenes (straight on and more overhead vertically). Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that when participants encoded objects and scenes from their canonical view they were more efficient at recognizing the viewpoints from even non-canonical perspectives. Finally, Experiment 6 explored canonical views in a judgment of relative direction task and showed that unlike the recognition task, both objects and scenes showed an advantage in straight on views with no differential alignment effects, suggesting that the canonical views are task-specific.","abstract_html":"People frequently encounter and interact with objects and scenes from various vantage points in everyday life. The present set of studies explored canonical viewpoints in objects and scenes. Three themes were focused on: First, what the actual preferred views are for objects verses scenes; second, whether those preferred views lead to better encoding and/or recognition; and third, how different types of tasks affect both the canonical view for objects and scenes as well as whether training/testing at canonical views affects performance. Experiments 1-3 demonstrated that people have distinct viewing preferences, even across different tasks, for objects (oblique and more level) and scenes (straight on and more overhead vertically). Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that when participants encoded objects and scenes from their canonical view they were more efficient at recognizing the viewpoints from even non-canonical perspectives. Finally, Experiment 6 explored canonical views in a judgment of relative direction task and showed that unlike the recognition task, both objects and scenes showed an advantage in straight on views with no differential alignment effects, suggesting that the canonical views are task-specific.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Higgins, James S."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Wang, Ranxiao F.","Simons, Daniel J.","Ross, Brian H.","Kirlik, Alex","Hummel, John E."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-25T14:59:40Z","date_published":"2011-05-25T14:59:40Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:23Z","subjects":["object","scene","viewpoint","canonical","preference","object recognition","scene recognition","navigation"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2011 James S. Higgins"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24313","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Wang, Ranxiao F.","Simons, Daniel J.","Ross, Brian H.","Kirlik, Alex","Hummel, John E."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Higgins, James S."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-25T14:59:40Z","2011-05"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["object","scene","viewpoint","canonical","preference","object recognition","scene recognition","navigation"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2011 James S. Higgins"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24313"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["People frequently encounter and interact with objects and scenes from various vantage points in everyday life. The present set of studies explored canonical viewpoints in objects and scenes. Three themes were focused on: First, what the actual preferred views are for objects verses scenes; second, whether those preferred views lead to better encoding and/or recognition; and third, how different types of tasks affect both the canonical view for objects and scenes as well as whether training/testing at canonical views affects performance. Experiments 1-3 demonstrated that people have distinct viewing preferences, even across different tasks, for objects (oblique and more level) and scenes (straight on and more overhead vertically). Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that when participants encoded objects and scenes from their canonical view they were more efficient at recognizing the viewpoints from even non-canonical perspectives. Finally, Experiment 6 explored canonical views in a judgment of relative direction task and showed that unlike the recognition task, both objects and scenes showed an advantage in straight on views with no differential alignment effects, suggesting that the canonical views are task-specific.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-04T15:19:40Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Higgins_James.doc: 11271168 bytes, checksum: 07495db0373b7641df190e387d60d02c (MD5) Higgins_James.pdf: 4949625 bytes, checksum: 6b8d59ea6e809e6c536c5892cbd523d9 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T14:59:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Higgins_James.pdf: 1516458 bytes, checksum: 2c8847834426b072c10c1dc54392fa2e (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: f71d32e102f6c04ebc12c5e45d587cc3 (MD5) Higgins_James.doc: 11271168 bytes, checksum: 07495db0373b7641df190e387d60d02c (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Canonical views of objects and scenes"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Wang, Ranxiao F.","Simons, Daniel J.","Ross, Brian H.","Kirlik, Alex","Hummel, John E."],"dc:creator":["Higgins, James S."],"dc:date":["2011-05-25T14:59:40Z","2011-05"],"dc:description":["People frequently encounter and interact with objects and scenes from various vantage points in everyday life. The present set of studies explored canonical viewpoints in objects and scenes. Three themes were focused on: First, what the actual preferred views are for objects verses scenes; second, whether those preferred views lead to better encoding and/or recognition; and third, how different types of tasks affect both the canonical view for objects and scenes as well as whether training/testing at canonical views affects performance. Experiments 1-3 demonstrated that people have distinct viewing preferences, even across different tasks, for objects (oblique and more level) and scenes (straight on and more overhead vertically). Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that when participants encoded objects and scenes from their canonical view they were more efficient at recognizing the viewpoints from even non-canonical perspectives. Finally, Experiment 6 explored canonical views in a judgment of relative direction task and showed that unlike the recognition task, both objects and scenes showed an advantage in straight on views with no differential alignment effects, suggesting that the canonical views are task-specific.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-04T15:19:40Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Higgins_James.doc: 11271168 bytes, checksum: 07495db0373b7641df190e387d60d02c (MD5) Higgins_James.pdf: 4949625 bytes, checksum: 6b8d59ea6e809e6c536c5892cbd523d9 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T14:59:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Higgins_James.pdf: 1516458 bytes, checksum: 2c8847834426b072c10c1dc54392fa2e (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: f71d32e102f6c04ebc12c5e45d587cc3 (MD5) Higgins_James.doc: 11271168 bytes, checksum: 07495db0373b7641df190e387d60d02c (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24313"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2011 James S. Higgins"],"dc:subject":["object","scene","viewpoint","canonical","preference","object recognition","scene recognition","navigation"],"dc:title":["Canonical views of objects and scenes"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:23Z"}