{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24195"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24195","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"\"\"\"I'm Too Good To Be Bad\"\": The Moderating Role of Honesty-Humility In Aggressive and Prosocial Reactions to First and Third Party Unfairness\"","abstract":"In considering the deontic perspective of justice, research has called for the study of individual difference variables that explain differential reactions to unfair treatment. This is specifically due to the emerging literature on moral self-regulation as a determinant of workplace behaviors for some individuals, but not others (Rupp & Bell, 2010). In this paper, I consider how first and third-party injustice interacts with honesty-humility in predicting positive and negative behaviors. I manipulated first- (Study 1, N=552 participants) and third- (Study 2, N=606) party justice via laboratory experiments examining both counterproductive and retaliatory as well as citizenship and performance behavioral intentions. Support for the main effect of honesty-humility on revenge and reconciliation as well as the moderating role of honesty-humility on the relationship between first- and third-party unfairness and both prosocial and aggressive behaviors was found, controlling for the already established effects of gender, negative affect, conscientiousness, and agreeableness.","abstract_html":"In considering the deontic perspective of justice, research has called for the study of individual difference variables that explain differential reactions to unfair treatment. This is specifically due to the emerging literature on moral self-regulation as a determinant of workplace behaviors for some individuals, but not others (Rupp & Bell, 2010). In this paper, I consider how first and third-party injustice interacts with honesty-humility in predicting positive and negative behaviors. I manipulated first- (Study 1, N=552 participants) and third- (Study 2, N=606) party justice via laboratory experiments examining both counterproductive and retaliatory as well as citizenship and performance behavioral intentions. Support for the main effect of honesty-humility on revenge and reconciliation as well as the moderating role of honesty-humility on the relationship between first- and third-party unfairness and both prosocial and aggressive behaviors was found, controlling for the already established effects of gender, negative affect, conscientiousness, and agreeableness.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Jones, Kisha S."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Rupp, Deborah E."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-25T15:08:51Z","date_published":"2011-05-25T15:08:51Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:24Z","subjects":["Moral Perspective of Organizational Justice","Honesty-Humility","Revenge","Reconciliation","Counterproductive Work Behavior","Organizational Citizenship Behavior"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2011 Kisha S. Jones"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24195","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Rupp, Deborah E."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Jones, Kisha S."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-25T15:08:51Z","2011-05"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Moral Perspective of Organizational Justice","Honesty-Humility","Revenge","Reconciliation","Counterproductive Work Behavior","Organizational Citizenship Behavior"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2011 Kisha S. Jones"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24195"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["In considering the deontic perspective of justice, research has called for the study of individual difference variables that explain differential reactions to unfair treatment. This is specifically due to the emerging literature on moral self-regulation as a determinant of workplace behaviors for some individuals, but not others (Rupp & Bell, 2010). In this paper, I consider how first and third-party injustice interacts with honesty-humility in predicting positive and negative behaviors. I manipulated first- (Study 1, N=552 participants) and third- (Study 2, N=606) party justice via laboratory experiments examining both counterproductive and retaliatory as well as citizenship and performance behavioral intentions. Support for the main effect of honesty-humility on revenge and reconciliation as well as the moderating role of honesty-humility on the relationship between first- and third-party unfairness and both prosocial and aggressive behaviors was found, controlling for the already established effects of gender, negative affect, conscientiousness, and agreeableness.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-26T15:56:08Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Jones_Kisha.docx: 130328 bytes, checksum: 5fdbd07e7cab50aea1410e99df60bef0 (MD5) Jones_Kisha.pdf: 239637 bytes, checksum: b4bee396e2ed33a2351148fda95fdeab (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T15:08:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 6 Jones_Kisha.pdf: 239097 bytes, checksum: 24b89d9bdd6b79a7210c7ec36db045ee (MD5) license.txt: 4061 bytes, checksum: dd9a4f853a2cabd9352360bbfc1bee4c (MD5) Jones_Kisha.docx: 130337 bytes, checksum: 073dbacd6087c099f680d62a9ed52cfa (MD5) 1_Jones_Kisha.docx: 130337 bytes, checksum: 073dbacd6087c099f680d62a9ed52cfa (MD5) 2_Jones_Kisha.docx: 130337 bytes, checksum: 073dbacd6087c099f680d62a9ed52cfa (MD5) 3_Jones_Kisha.docx: 130337 bytes, checksum: 073dbacd6087c099f680d62a9ed52cfa (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["\"\"\"I'm Too Good To Be Bad\"\": The Moderating Role of Honesty-Humility In Aggressive and Prosocial Reactions to First and Third Party Unfairness\""]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Rupp, Deborah E."],"dc:creator":["Jones, Kisha S."],"dc:date":["2011-05-25T15:08:51Z","2011-05"],"dc:description":["In considering the deontic perspective of justice, research has called for the study of individual difference variables that explain differential reactions to unfair treatment. This is specifically due to the emerging literature on moral self-regulation as a determinant of workplace behaviors for some individuals, but not others (Rupp & Bell, 2010). In this paper, I consider how first and third-party injustice interacts with honesty-humility in predicting positive and negative behaviors. I manipulated first- (Study 1, N=552 participants) and third- (Study 2, N=606) party justice via laboratory experiments examining both counterproductive and retaliatory as well as citizenship and performance behavioral intentions. Support for the main effect of honesty-humility on revenge and reconciliation as well as the moderating role of honesty-humility on the relationship between first- and third-party unfairness and both prosocial and aggressive behaviors was found, controlling for the already established effects of gender, negative affect, conscientiousness, and agreeableness.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-26T15:56:08Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Jones_Kisha.docx: 130328 bytes, checksum: 5fdbd07e7cab50aea1410e99df60bef0 (MD5) Jones_Kisha.pdf: 239637 bytes, checksum: b4bee396e2ed33a2351148fda95fdeab (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T15:08:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 6 Jones_Kisha.pdf: 239097 bytes, checksum: 24b89d9bdd6b79a7210c7ec36db045ee (MD5) license.txt: 4061 bytes, checksum: dd9a4f853a2cabd9352360bbfc1bee4c (MD5) Jones_Kisha.docx: 130337 bytes, checksum: 073dbacd6087c099f680d62a9ed52cfa (MD5) 1_Jones_Kisha.docx: 130337 bytes, checksum: 073dbacd6087c099f680d62a9ed52cfa (MD5) 2_Jones_Kisha.docx: 130337 bytes, checksum: 073dbacd6087c099f680d62a9ed52cfa (MD5) 3_Jones_Kisha.docx: 130337 bytes, checksum: 073dbacd6087c099f680d62a9ed52cfa (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24195"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2011 Kisha S. Jones"],"dc:subject":["Moral Perspective of Organizational Justice","Honesty-Humility","Revenge","Reconciliation","Counterproductive Work Behavior","Organizational Citizenship Behavior"],"dc:title":["\"\"\"I'm Too Good To Be Bad\"\": The Moderating Role of Honesty-Humility In Aggressive and Prosocial Reactions to First and Third Party Unfairness\""],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:24Z"}