{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24110"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24110","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Motivating science learning","abstract":"Dual-processing theories of conceptual change hypothesize that if children are more personally involved in a lesson they will process the information more deeply leading to more and stronger conceptual change (Dole & Sinatra, 1998). This study tests this theory by increasing personal involvement through anticipation of a future discussion. Furthermore, argumentative discussions using the Collaborative Reasoning (CR) approach are thought to be more involving than regular discussions (Chinn, Anderson, & Waggoner, 2001) so exposure to CR discussions was used to increase this effect. Classrooms were randomly assigned to receive either CR discussions or regular instruction. Before reading a new text about the shape of the Earth, half of the students were informed they would later discuss the text. Students read clause-by-clause on a computer to record reading times. After reading the story, students received a comprehension test and a self-assessment survey. Before and after the intervention students were given the shape of the Earth interview (Vosniadou & Brewer, 1992) to assess their conceptual change. Students who experienced CR had longer reading times and more conceptual change but lower self-assessed depth of processing. Those students who had an announcement had increased comprehension but no other significant effects. These results partially support the dual-process theory but suggest that CR students are processing both the text and their own beliefs during reading leading to longer reading times and more conceptual change, but not improved comprehension of the text.","abstract_html":"Dual-processing theories of conceptual change hypothesize that if children are more personally involved in a lesson they will process the information more deeply leading to more and stronger conceptual change (Dole & Sinatra, 1998). This study tests this theory by increasing personal involvement through anticipation of a future discussion. Furthermore, argumentative discussions using the Collaborative Reasoning (CR) approach are thought to be more involving than regular discussions (Chinn, Anderson, & Waggoner, 2001) so exposure to CR discussions was used to increase this effect. Classrooms were randomly assigned to receive either CR discussions or regular instruction. Before reading a new text about the shape of the Earth, half of the students were informed they would later discuss the text. Students read clause-by-clause on a computer to record reading times. After reading the story, students received a comprehension test and a self-assessment survey. Before and after the intervention students were given the shape of the Earth interview (Vosniadou & Brewer, 1992) to assess their conceptual change. Students who experienced CR had longer reading times and more conceptual change but lower self-assessed depth of processing. Those students who had an announcement had increased comprehension but no other significant effects. These results partially support the dual-process theory but suggest that CR students are processing both the text and their own beliefs during reading leading to longer reading times and more conceptual change, but not improved comprehension of the text.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Miller, Brian W."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educational Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Anderson, Richard C.","Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad","Brewer, William F.","Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A.L."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-25T14:56:24Z","date_published":"2011-05-25T14:56:24Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:23Z","subjects":["Conceptual change","science education","naive theories","classroom discussion","collaborative reasoning","depth of processing","self-paced reading","argumentative discussion","mixed-effects models"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2011 Brian W. Miller"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24110","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Anderson, Richard C.","Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad","Brewer, William F.","Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A.L."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Miller, Brian W."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-25T14:56:24Z","2011-05"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Conceptual change","science education","naive theories","classroom discussion","collaborative reasoning","depth of processing","self-paced reading","argumentative discussion","mixed-effects models"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2011 Brian W. Miller"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24110"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Dual-processing theories of conceptual change hypothesize that if children are more personally involved in a lesson they will process the information more deeply leading to more and stronger conceptual change (Dole & Sinatra, 1998). This study tests this theory by increasing personal involvement through anticipation of a future discussion. Furthermore, argumentative discussions using the Collaborative Reasoning (CR) approach are thought to be more involving than regular discussions (Chinn, Anderson, & Waggoner, 2001) so exposure to CR discussions was used to increase this effect. Classrooms were randomly assigned to receive either CR discussions or regular instruction. Before reading a new text about the shape of the Earth, half of the students were informed they would later discuss the text. Students read clause-by-clause on a computer to record reading times. After reading the story, students received a comprehension test and a self-assessment survey. Before and after the intervention students were given the shape of the Earth interview (Vosniadou & Brewer, 1992) to assess their conceptual change. Students who experienced CR had longer reading times and more conceptual change but lower self-assessed depth of processing. Those students who had an announcement had increased comprehension but no other significant effects. These results partially support the dual-process theory but suggest that CR students are processing both the text and their own beliefs during reading leading to longer reading times and more conceptual change, but not improved comprehension of the text.","Item withdrawn by Alexis Thompson (athmpsn1@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-19T17:42:59Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Miller_Brian.doc: 11987968 bytes, checksum: 87ce320c72527b43c0d2eea752461c08 (MD5) Miller_Brian.pdf: 2753476 bytes, checksum: 59b94a80ac9513a20f9c988affa82474 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T14:56:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Miller_Brian.pdf: 2753476 bytes, checksum: 59b94a80ac9513a20f9c988affa82474 (MD5) license.txt: 4062 bytes, checksum: b18aff1de65468624cef784f37866014 (MD5) Miller_Brian.doc: 11987968 bytes, checksum: 87ce320c72527b43c0d2eea752461c08 (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Motivating science learning"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Anderson, Richard C.","Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad","Brewer, William F.","Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A.L."],"dc:creator":["Miller, Brian W."],"dc:date":["2011-05-25T14:56:24Z","2011-05"],"dc:description":["Dual-processing theories of conceptual change hypothesize that if children are more personally involved in a lesson they will process the information more deeply leading to more and stronger conceptual change (Dole & Sinatra, 1998). This study tests this theory by increasing personal involvement through anticipation of a future discussion. Furthermore, argumentative discussions using the Collaborative Reasoning (CR) approach are thought to be more involving than regular discussions (Chinn, Anderson, & Waggoner, 2001) so exposure to CR discussions was used to increase this effect. Classrooms were randomly assigned to receive either CR discussions or regular instruction. Before reading a new text about the shape of the Earth, half of the students were informed they would later discuss the text. Students read clause-by-clause on a computer to record reading times. After reading the story, students received a comprehension test and a self-assessment survey. Before and after the intervention students were given the shape of the Earth interview (Vosniadou & Brewer, 1992) to assess their conceptual change. Students who experienced CR had longer reading times and more conceptual change but lower self-assessed depth of processing. Those students who had an announcement had increased comprehension but no other significant effects. These results partially support the dual-process theory but suggest that CR students are processing both the text and their own beliefs during reading leading to longer reading times and more conceptual change, but not improved comprehension of the text.","Item withdrawn by Alexis Thompson (athmpsn1@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-19T17:42:59Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Miller_Brian.doc: 11987968 bytes, checksum: 87ce320c72527b43c0d2eea752461c08 (MD5) Miller_Brian.pdf: 2753476 bytes, checksum: 59b94a80ac9513a20f9c988affa82474 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T14:56:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Miller_Brian.pdf: 2753476 bytes, checksum: 59b94a80ac9513a20f9c988affa82474 (MD5) license.txt: 4062 bytes, checksum: b18aff1de65468624cef784f37866014 (MD5) Miller_Brian.doc: 11987968 bytes, checksum: 87ce320c72527b43c0d2eea752461c08 (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24110"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2011 Brian W. Miller"],"dc:subject":["Conceptual change","science education","naive theories","classroom discussion","collaborative reasoning","depth of processing","self-paced reading","argumentative discussion","mixed-effects models"],"dc:title":["Motivating science learning"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:23Z"}