{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24101"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/24101","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Charged device model electrostatic discharge failures in system on a chip and system in a package designs","abstract":"Advances in integrated circuit design and packaging techniques have introduced new ESD-susceptible (Electrostatic Discharge) circuit interfaces. This document will introduce these interfaces and the methods that were used to investigate their ESD robustness. Two test chips were designed to aid the analysis. The specialized design choices that allow for distinguishing between multiple failure locations are thoroughly illustrated. The testing plan is detailed and the test chip measurement results are analyzed. The results will compare different ESD protection techniques and illustrate the importance of having ESD protection at these interfaces. The results will also show how some interfaces are inherently more robust than others during a CDM (Charged Device Model) event. Finally, the effects on the intensity of the CDM stress based on single-die or stacked-die packages will be compared.","abstract_html":"Advances in integrated circuit design and packaging techniques have introduced new ESD-susceptible (Electrostatic Discharge) circuit interfaces. This document will introduce these interfaces and the methods that were used to investigate their ESD robustness. Two test chips were designed to aid the analysis. The specialized design choices that allow for distinguishing between multiple failure locations are thoroughly illustrated. The testing plan is detailed and the test chip measurement results are analyzed. The results will compare different ESD protection techniques and illustrate the importance of having ESD protection at these interfaces. The results will also show how some interfaces are inherently more robust than others during a CDM (Charged Device Model) event. Finally, the effects on the intensity of the CDM stress based on single-die or stacked-die packages will be compared.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Olson, Nicholas A."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Electrical & Computer Engr","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Rosenbaum, Elyse","Feng, Milton","Shanbhag, Naresh R.","Schutt-Ainé, José E."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-25T14:50:54Z","date_published":"2011-05-25T14:50:54Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:23Z","subjects":["Charged Device Model","Charged Device Model (CDM)","Electrostatic Discharge (ESD)","Electrostatic Discharge","System on a Chip","System in a Package"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2011 Nicholas A. Olson"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24101","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Rosenbaum, Elyse","Feng, Milton","Shanbhag, Naresh R.","Schutt-Ainé, José E."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Olson, Nicholas A."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-25T14:50:54Z","2011-05"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Electrical & Computer Engr"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Charged Device Model","Charged Device Model (CDM)","Electrostatic Discharge (ESD)","Electrostatic Discharge","System on a Chip","System in a Package"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2011 Nicholas A. Olson"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24101"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Advances in integrated circuit design and packaging techniques have introduced new ESD-susceptible (Electrostatic Discharge) circuit interfaces. This document will introduce these interfaces and the methods that were used to investigate their ESD robustness. Two test chips were designed to aid the analysis. The specialized design choices that allow for distinguishing between multiple failure locations are thoroughly illustrated. The testing plan is detailed and the test chip measurement results are analyzed. The results will compare different ESD protection techniques and illustrate the importance of having ESD protection at these interfaces. The results will also show how some interfaces are inherently more robust than others during a CDM (Charged Device Model) event. Finally, the effects on the intensity of the CDM stress based on single-die or stacked-die packages will be compared.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-19T14:11:58Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Olson_Nicholas.docx: 2338306 bytes, checksum: 8feda660a20833a09a08d30e4cdc2a9c (MD5) Olson_Nicholas.pdf: 1227094 bytes, checksum: b018bc91f49ad7fe9eb5e677de5f8fc9 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T14:50:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Olson_Nicholas.pdf: 1227094 bytes, checksum: b018bc91f49ad7fe9eb5e677de5f8fc9 (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: e7908f494bd72fc1a40b16dab3ecd378 (MD5) Olson_Nicholas.docx: 2338306 bytes, checksum: 8feda660a20833a09a08d30e4cdc2a9c (MD5)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Charged device model electrostatic discharge failures in system on a chip and system in a package designs"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Rosenbaum, Elyse","Feng, Milton","Shanbhag, Naresh R.","Schutt-Ainé, José E."],"dc:creator":["Olson, Nicholas A."],"dc:date":["2011-05-25T14:50:54Z","2011-05"],"dc:description":["Advances in integrated circuit design and packaging techniques have introduced new ESD-susceptible (Electrostatic Discharge) circuit interfaces. This document will introduce these interfaces and the methods that were used to investigate their ESD robustness. Two test chips were designed to aid the analysis. The specialized design choices that allow for distinguishing between multiple failure locations are thoroughly illustrated. The testing plan is detailed and the test chip measurement results are analyzed. The results will compare different ESD protection techniques and illustrate the importance of having ESD protection at these interfaces. The results will also show how some interfaces are inherently more robust than others during a CDM (Charged Device Model) event. Finally, the effects on the intensity of the CDM stress based on single-die or stacked-die packages will be compared.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2011-04-19T14:11:58Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Olson_Nicholas.docx: 2338306 bytes, checksum: 8feda660a20833a09a08d30e4cdc2a9c (MD5) Olson_Nicholas.pdf: 1227094 bytes, checksum: b018bc91f49ad7fe9eb5e677de5f8fc9 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-25T14:50:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Olson_Nicholas.pdf: 1227094 bytes, checksum: b018bc91f49ad7fe9eb5e677de5f8fc9 (MD5) license.txt: 4063 bytes, checksum: e7908f494bd72fc1a40b16dab3ecd378 (MD5) Olson_Nicholas.docx: 2338306 bytes, checksum: 8feda660a20833a09a08d30e4cdc2a9c (MD5)"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/24101"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2011 Nicholas A. Olson"],"dc:subject":["Charged Device Model","Charged Device Model (CDM)","Electrostatic Discharge (ESD)","Electrostatic Discharge","System on a Chip","System in a Package"],"dc:title":["Charged device model electrostatic discharge failures in system on a chip and system in a package designs"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Electrical & Computer Engr"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:23Z"}