{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23535"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23535","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The salience of part-whole relatedness on reasoning about relative magnitude","abstract":"Three experiments demonstrate that part-whole pairs (e.g., tree-leaf) are processed much differently than pairs of unrelated objects in comparative judgment tasks. In Experiment 1 subjects verified the relative size of part-whole pairs and unrelated controls. The effect of symbolic distance was much smaller for part-whole pairs than for unrelated controls. This attenuation of the symbolic distance effect is inconsistent with most models of comparative judgment because they propose that relative magnitude is computed from a comparison of absolute magnitude. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that the relative magnitude of part-whole pairs is determined by directly retrieving relational information. Subjects judged which of two objects was closer to a third reference object. Subjects were reliably faster for triples with part-whole pairs only when the part-whole relation could be used to infer which of the two objects was closer to the reference object. This result indicates that the attenuation of symbolic distance in Experiment 1 is attributable to the use of relational information. Finally, an introduction of a SOA between stimulus pair and question in Experiment 3 provided evidence that some of the advantage of part-whole pairs is attributable to an early encoding advantage.","abstract_html":"Three experiments demonstrate that part-whole pairs (e.g., tree-leaf) are processed much differently than pairs of unrelated objects in comparative judgment tasks. In Experiment 1 subjects verified the relative size of part-whole pairs and unrelated controls. The effect of symbolic distance was much smaller for part-whole pairs than for unrelated controls. This attenuation of the symbolic distance effect is inconsistent with most models of comparative judgment because they propose that relative magnitude is computed from a comparison of absolute magnitude. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that the relative magnitude of part-whole pairs is determined by directly retrieving relational information. Subjects judged which of two objects was closer to a third reference object. Subjects were reliably faster for triples with part-whole pairs only when the part-whole relation could be used to infer which of the two objects was closer to the reference object. This result indicates that the attenuation of symbolic distance in Experiment 1 is attributable to the use of relational information. Finally, an introduction of a SOA between stimulus pair and question in Experiment 3 provided evidence that some of the advantage of part-whole pairs is attributable to an early encoding advantage.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Sailor, Kevin Matthew"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology, Experimental","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Shoben, Edward J."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T14:17:48Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T14:17:48Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:22Z","subjects":["Psychology, Experimental"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1991 Sailor, Kevin Matthew"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9124480","(UMI)AAI9124480"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9124480","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9124480","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23535","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Shoben, Edward J."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Sailor, Kevin Matthew"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T14:17:48Z","10000-01-01","1991"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology, Experimental"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Experimental"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1991 Sailor, Kevin Matthew"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9124480","(UMI)AAI9124480","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23535"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Three experiments demonstrate that part-whole pairs (e.g., tree-leaf) are processed much differently than pairs of unrelated objects in comparative judgment tasks. In Experiment 1 subjects verified the relative size of part-whole pairs and unrelated controls. The effect of symbolic distance was much smaller for part-whole pairs than for unrelated controls. This attenuation of the symbolic distance effect is inconsistent with most models of comparative judgment because they propose that relative magnitude is computed from a comparison of absolute magnitude. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that the relative magnitude of part-whole pairs is determined by directly retrieving relational information. Subjects judged which of two objects was closer to a third reference object. Subjects were reliably faster for triples with part-whole pairs only when the part-whole relation could be used to infer which of the two objects was closer to the reference object. This result indicates that the attenuation of symbolic distance in Experiment 1 is attributable to the use of relational information. Finally, an introduction of a SOA between stimulus pair and question in Experiment 3 provided evidence that some of the advantage of part-whole pairs is attributable to an early encoding advantage.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:17:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9124480.pdf: 3958119 bytes, checksum: f290dc9de0a34a1273f4df67507985e5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:05:08Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:31:10-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The salience of part-whole relatedness on reasoning about relative magnitude"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Shoben, Edward J."],"dc:creator":["Sailor, Kevin Matthew"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T14:17:48Z","10000-01-01","1991"],"dc:description":["Three experiments demonstrate that part-whole pairs (e.g., tree-leaf) are processed much differently than pairs of unrelated objects in comparative judgment tasks. In Experiment 1 subjects verified the relative size of part-whole pairs and unrelated controls. The effect of symbolic distance was much smaller for part-whole pairs than for unrelated controls. This attenuation of the symbolic distance effect is inconsistent with most models of comparative judgment because they propose that relative magnitude is computed from a comparison of absolute magnitude. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that the relative magnitude of part-whole pairs is determined by directly retrieving relational information. Subjects judged which of two objects was closer to a third reference object. Subjects were reliably faster for triples with part-whole pairs only when the part-whole relation could be used to infer which of the two objects was closer to the reference object. This result indicates that the attenuation of symbolic distance in Experiment 1 is attributable to the use of relational information. Finally, an introduction of a SOA between stimulus pair and question in Experiment 3 provided evidence that some of the advantage of part-whole pairs is attributable to an early encoding advantage.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:17:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9124480.pdf: 3958119 bytes, checksum: f290dc9de0a34a1273f4df67507985e5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:05:08Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:31:10-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9124480","(UMI)AAI9124480","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23535"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1991 Sailor, Kevin Matthew"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Experimental"],"dc:title":["The salience of part-whole relatedness on reasoning about relative magnitude"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology, Experimental"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:22Z"}