{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23488"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23488","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The logic behind lies: A rational approach to deceptive message production","abstract":"Although researchers of deception have become increasingly interested in the production of deceptive messages, no attempt has been made to provide a conceptual basis for addressing deceptive message design. The goal of the current project was to develop a theoretical basis for addressing deceptive message design. Drawing upon O'Keefe's theory of message design logics (1988), it was argued that individual design logic should influence both perceptions of situational relevance and the information that is disclosed within multiple-goal contexts. Two hypotheses and a research question were developed and tested in a sample of 295 subjects. Results suggest that design logic significantly influenced perceptions of situational relevance, amount of sensitive information that was disclosed, and the manner in which the sensitive information was disclosed within multiple-goal contexts. Implications of these findings for future research in deceptive message production are discussed.","abstract_html":"Although researchers of deception have become increasingly interested in the production of deceptive messages, no attempt has been made to provide a conceptual basis for addressing deceptive message design. The goal of the current project was to develop a theoretical basis for addressing deceptive message design. Drawing upon O'Keefe's theory of message design logics (1988), it was argued that individual design logic should influence both perceptions of situational relevance and the information that is disclosed within multiple-goal contexts. Two hypotheses and a research question were developed and tested in a sample of 295 subjects. Results suggest that design logic significantly influenced perceptions of situational relevance, amount of sensitive information that was disclosed, and the manner in which the sensitive information was disclosed within multiple-goal contexts. Implications of these findings for future research in deceptive message production are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["McCornack, Steven Allen"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Speech Communication","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["O'Keefe, Barbara J."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T14:16:02Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T14:16:02Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:22Z","subjects":["Speech Communication"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1990 McCornack, Steven Allen"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9026266","(UMI)AAI9026266"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9026266","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9026266","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23488","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["O'Keefe, Barbara J."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["McCornack, Steven Allen"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T14:16:02Z","10000-01-01","1990"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Speech Communication"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Speech Communication"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1990 McCornack, Steven Allen"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9026266","(UMI)AAI9026266","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23488"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Although researchers of deception have become increasingly interested in the production of deceptive messages, no attempt has been made to provide a conceptual basis for addressing deceptive message design. The goal of the current project was to develop a theoretical basis for addressing deceptive message design. Drawing upon O'Keefe's theory of message design logics (1988), it was argued that individual design logic should influence both perceptions of situational relevance and the information that is disclosed within multiple-goal contexts. Two hypotheses and a research question were developed and tested in a sample of 295 subjects. Results suggest that design logic significantly influenced perceptions of situational relevance, amount of sensitive information that was disclosed, and the manner in which the sensitive information was disclosed within multiple-goal contexts. Implications of these findings for future research in deceptive message production are discussed.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:16:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9026266.pdf: 3518367 bytes, checksum: 9407f43d3a0aadb54a2c35b3aa3c600d (MD5) Previous issue date: 1990","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:04:49Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:31:00-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The logic behind lies: A rational approach to deceptive message production"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["O'Keefe, Barbara J."],"dc:creator":["McCornack, Steven Allen"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T14:16:02Z","10000-01-01","1990"],"dc:description":["Although researchers of deception have become increasingly interested in the production of deceptive messages, no attempt has been made to provide a conceptual basis for addressing deceptive message design. The goal of the current project was to develop a theoretical basis for addressing deceptive message design. Drawing upon O'Keefe's theory of message design logics (1988), it was argued that individual design logic should influence both perceptions of situational relevance and the information that is disclosed within multiple-goal contexts. Two hypotheses and a research question were developed and tested in a sample of 295 subjects. Results suggest that design logic significantly influenced perceptions of situational relevance, amount of sensitive information that was disclosed, and the manner in which the sensitive information was disclosed within multiple-goal contexts. Implications of these findings for future research in deceptive message production are discussed.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:16:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9026266.pdf: 3518367 bytes, checksum: 9407f43d3a0aadb54a2c35b3aa3c600d (MD5) Previous issue date: 1990","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:04:49Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:31:00-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9026266","(UMI)AAI9026266","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23488"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1990 McCornack, Steven Allen"],"dc:subject":["Speech Communication"],"dc:title":["The logic behind lies: A rational approach to deceptive message production"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Speech Communication"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:22Z"}