{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23357"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23357","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Private supper/public feast: Gender, power, and nurture in Early Modern England","abstract":"\"The dissertation analyzes how instances of eating, preparing, and serving food in the plays of Shakespeare and Jonson are liminal activities, stationed on the threshold of old and new forms of hospitality, constructions of public and private, gender and work. Because these issues punctuate the broader economic and social restructuring of early modern England, my study contributes to the theoretical and historical discussions of gender, culture, and literature of the period. Communal feasting in these texts does not signify social harmony, but often reflects disorder and inequality among diners and anxieties about the commodification and decline of hospitality, as it both recalls and denies the possibility of truly egalitarian commensality. What's more, Shakespearean meal scenes contradict contemporary cultural practices by placing male characters in the traditionally female position of food providers. The places and processes of meals in Shakespeare's plays reveal tensions within the state, the family, and marriage about the legitimacy of women's cultural/culinary power. Jonson shows these conflicts at work in the Jacobean marketplace, in Bartholomew Fair (1614), which satirizes (and furthers) the commodification of food and hospitality, particularly as it is served by its chief merchant, Ursula the pig-woman, who deals in pork and punks \"\"both piping hot.\"\" The text simultaneously impugns the oily if lucrative vocation (and body) of Ursula as it exonerates her as a harmless carnivalesque \"\"fat folk.\"\" By historicizing the market woman, I argue that in the period, women's food-related activities were political and potentially transgressive. I show the interrelations among contemporary concerns about commodity exchange, the regulation of the market, the illegitimacy of women as economic rivals, the cultural value of communal eating, and the power of patriarchs to enforce their law.\"","abstract_html":"&quot;The dissertation analyzes how instances of eating, preparing, and serving food in the plays of Shakespeare and Jonson are liminal activities, stationed on the threshold of old and new forms of hospitality, constructions of public and private, gender and work. Because these issues punctuate the broader economic and social restructuring of early modern England, my study contributes to the theoretical and historical discussions of gender, culture, and literature of the period. Communal feasting in these texts does not signify social harmony, but often reflects disorder and inequality among diners and anxieties about the commodification and decline of hospitality, as it both recalls and denies the possibility of truly egalitarian commensality. What&#x27;s more, Shakespearean meal scenes contradict contemporary cultural practices by placing male characters in the traditionally female position of food providers. The places and processes of meals in Shakespeare&#x27;s plays reveal tensions within the state, the family, and marriage about the legitimacy of women&#x27;s cultural/culinary power. Jonson shows these conflicts at work in the Jacobean marketplace, in Bartholomew Fair (1614), which satirizes (and furthers) the commodification of food and hospitality, particularly as it is served by its chief merchant, Ursula the pig-woman, who deals in pork and punks &quot;&quot;both piping hot.&quot;&quot; The text simultaneously impugns the oily if lucrative vocation (and body) of Ursula as it exonerates her as a harmless carnivalesque &quot;&quot;fat folk.&quot;&quot; By historicizing the market woman, I argue that in the period, women&#x27;s food-related activities were political and potentially transgressive. I show the interrelations among contemporary concerns about commodity exchange, the regulation of the market, the illegitimacy of women as economic rivals, the cultural value of communal eating, and the power of patriarchs to enforce their law.&quot;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Christensen, Ann Caroline"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"English","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Neely, Carol T."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T14:11:18Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T14:11:18Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:21Z","subjects":["Theater","Literature, English","Women's Studies"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1991 Christensen, Ann Caroline"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9210766","(UMI)AAI9210766"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9210766","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9210766","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23357","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Neely, Carol T."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Christensen, Ann Caroline"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T14:11:18Z","10000-01-01","1991"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["English"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Theater","Literature, English","Women's Studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1991 Christensen, Ann Caroline"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9210766","(UMI)AAI9210766","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23357"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"The dissertation analyzes how instances of eating, preparing, and serving food in the plays of Shakespeare and Jonson are liminal activities, stationed on the threshold of old and new forms of hospitality, constructions of public and private, gender and work. Because these issues punctuate the broader economic and social restructuring of early modern England, my study contributes to the theoretical and historical discussions of gender, culture, and literature of the period. Communal feasting in these texts does not signify social harmony, but often reflects disorder and inequality among diners and anxieties about the commodification and decline of hospitality, as it both recalls and denies the possibility of truly egalitarian commensality. What's more, Shakespearean meal scenes contradict contemporary cultural practices by placing male characters in the traditionally female position of food providers. The places and processes of meals in Shakespeare's plays reveal tensions within the state, the family, and marriage about the legitimacy of women's cultural/culinary power. Jonson shows these conflicts at work in the Jacobean marketplace, in Bartholomew Fair (1614), which satirizes (and furthers) the commodification of food and hospitality, particularly as it is served by its chief merchant, Ursula the pig-woman, who deals in pork and punks \"\"both piping hot.\"\" The text simultaneously impugns the oily if lucrative vocation (and body) of Ursula as it exonerates her as a harmless carnivalesque \"\"fat folk.\"\" By historicizing the market woman, I argue that in the period, women's food-related activities were political and potentially transgressive. I show the interrelations among contemporary concerns about commodity exchange, the regulation of the market, the illegitimacy of women as economic rivals, the cultural value of communal eating, and the power of patriarchs to enforce their law.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:11:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9210766.pdf: 17170358 bytes, checksum: 7eb3d45e5f6f6205cf91251e703d2521 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:03:55Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:30:30-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Private supper/public feast: Gender, power, and nurture in Early Modern England"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Neely, Carol T."],"dc:creator":["Christensen, Ann Caroline"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T14:11:18Z","10000-01-01","1991"],"dc:description":["\"The dissertation analyzes how instances of eating, preparing, and serving food in the plays of Shakespeare and Jonson are liminal activities, stationed on the threshold of old and new forms of hospitality, constructions of public and private, gender and work. Because these issues punctuate the broader economic and social restructuring of early modern England, my study contributes to the theoretical and historical discussions of gender, culture, and literature of the period. Communal feasting in these texts does not signify social harmony, but often reflects disorder and inequality among diners and anxieties about the commodification and decline of hospitality, as it both recalls and denies the possibility of truly egalitarian commensality. What's more, Shakespearean meal scenes contradict contemporary cultural practices by placing male characters in the traditionally female position of food providers. The places and processes of meals in Shakespeare's plays reveal tensions within the state, the family, and marriage about the legitimacy of women's cultural/culinary power. Jonson shows these conflicts at work in the Jacobean marketplace, in Bartholomew Fair (1614), which satirizes (and furthers) the commodification of food and hospitality, particularly as it is served by its chief merchant, Ursula the pig-woman, who deals in pork and punks \"\"both piping hot.\"\" The text simultaneously impugns the oily if lucrative vocation (and body) of Ursula as it exonerates her as a harmless carnivalesque \"\"fat folk.\"\" By historicizing the market woman, I argue that in the period, women's food-related activities were political and potentially transgressive. I show the interrelations among contemporary concerns about commodity exchange, the regulation of the market, the illegitimacy of women as economic rivals, the cultural value of communal eating, and the power of patriarchs to enforce their law.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:11:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9210766.pdf: 17170358 bytes, checksum: 7eb3d45e5f6f6205cf91251e703d2521 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:03:55Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:30:30-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9210766","(UMI)AAI9210766","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23357"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1991 Christensen, Ann Caroline"],"dc:subject":["Theater","Literature, English","Women's Studies"],"dc:title":["Private supper/public feast: Gender, power, and nurture in Early Modern England"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["English"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:21Z"}