{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23275"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23275","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Situational factors affecting judgments of future performance and judgment-performance correspondence","abstract":"The present study investigated the effects of three situational factors on judgments of future performance, judgment confidence, and judgment-performance correspondence. Research participants were familiarized with the performance task under varying conditions of monetary rewards, perceived internal control, and private/public disclosure of the judgments. Judgments of future performance and confidence were highest when individuals perceived high levels of internal control and when monetary rewards (both contingent and noncontingent) were present. Task persistence was greatest under the conditions of contingent rewards and high perceived internal control, however, actual performance was not affected by any of the situational factors. Measures of judgment accuracy and judgment-performance relations indicated that the correspondence between judgments of future performance and actual performance varied as a function of the situational factors. Specifically, individuals overestimated their future performance levels the least when perceived internal control was low and when no monetary rewards were involved. The judgment-performance relation was the strongest with no monetary rewards, high perceived internal control, and public disclosure of the judgments. Satisfaction with performance on the almanac task was negatively related to the degree to which judgments of future performance exceeded actual performance levels. These results are discussed in a theoretical framework that contrasts judgments of future performance and self-set goals.","abstract_html":"The present study investigated the effects of three situational factors on judgments of future performance, judgment confidence, and judgment-performance correspondence. Research participants were familiarized with the performance task under varying conditions of monetary rewards, perceived internal control, and private/public disclosure of the judgments. Judgments of future performance and confidence were highest when individuals perceived high levels of internal control and when monetary rewards (both contingent and noncontingent) were present. Task persistence was greatest under the conditions of contingent rewards and high perceived internal control, however, actual performance was not affected by any of the situational factors. Measures of judgment accuracy and judgment-performance relations indicated that the correspondence between judgments of future performance and actual performance varied as a function of the situational factors. Specifically, individuals overestimated their future performance levels the least when perceived internal control was low and when no monetary rewards were involved. The judgment-performance relation was the strongest with no monetary rewards, high perceived internal control, and public disclosure of the judgments. Satisfaction with performance on the almanac task was negatively related to the degree to which judgments of future performance exceeded actual performance levels. These results are discussed in a theoretical framework that contrasts judgments of future performance and self-set goals.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Henry, Rebecca Ann"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Shiezek, Janet"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T14:08:20Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T14:08:20Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:21Z","subjects":["Psychology, Social","Psychology, Experimental","Psychology, Industrial"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1989 Henry, Rebecca Ann"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI8924836","(UMI)AAI8924836"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI8924836","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI8924836","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23275","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Shiezek, Janet"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Henry, Rebecca Ann"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T14:08:20Z","10000-01-01","1989"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Social","Psychology, Experimental","Psychology, Industrial"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1989 Henry, Rebecca Ann"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI8924836","(UMI)AAI8924836","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23275"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The present study investigated the effects of three situational factors on judgments of future performance, judgment confidence, and judgment-performance correspondence. Research participants were familiarized with the performance task under varying conditions of monetary rewards, perceived internal control, and private/public disclosure of the judgments. Judgments of future performance and confidence were highest when individuals perceived high levels of internal control and when monetary rewards (both contingent and noncontingent) were present. Task persistence was greatest under the conditions of contingent rewards and high perceived internal control, however, actual performance was not affected by any of the situational factors. Measures of judgment accuracy and judgment-performance relations indicated that the correspondence between judgments of future performance and actual performance varied as a function of the situational factors. Specifically, individuals overestimated their future performance levels the least when perceived internal control was low and when no monetary rewards were involved. The judgment-performance relation was the strongest with no monetary rewards, high perceived internal control, and public disclosure of the judgments. Satisfaction with performance on the almanac task was negatively related to the degree to which judgments of future performance exceeded actual performance levels. These results are discussed in a theoretical framework that contrasts judgments of future performance and self-set goals.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:08:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 8924836.pdf: 4343061 bytes, checksum: 571fe0d96faff9a171f8ca8ecf82bb0f (MD5) Previous issue date: 1989","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:03:22Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:30:12-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Situational factors affecting judgments of future performance and judgment-performance correspondence"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Shiezek, Janet"],"dc:creator":["Henry, Rebecca Ann"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T14:08:20Z","10000-01-01","1989"],"dc:description":["The present study investigated the effects of three situational factors on judgments of future performance, judgment confidence, and judgment-performance correspondence. Research participants were familiarized with the performance task under varying conditions of monetary rewards, perceived internal control, and private/public disclosure of the judgments. Judgments of future performance and confidence were highest when individuals perceived high levels of internal control and when monetary rewards (both contingent and noncontingent) were present. Task persistence was greatest under the conditions of contingent rewards and high perceived internal control, however, actual performance was not affected by any of the situational factors. Measures of judgment accuracy and judgment-performance relations indicated that the correspondence between judgments of future performance and actual performance varied as a function of the situational factors. Specifically, individuals overestimated their future performance levels the least when perceived internal control was low and when no monetary rewards were involved. The judgment-performance relation was the strongest with no monetary rewards, high perceived internal control, and public disclosure of the judgments. Satisfaction with performance on the almanac task was negatively related to the degree to which judgments of future performance exceeded actual performance levels. These results are discussed in a theoretical framework that contrasts judgments of future performance and self-set goals.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:08:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 8924836.pdf: 4343061 bytes, checksum: 571fe0d96faff9a171f8ca8ecf82bb0f (MD5) Previous issue date: 1989","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:03:22Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:30:12-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI8924836","(UMI)AAI8924836","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23275"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1989 Henry, Rebecca Ann"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Social","Psychology, Experimental","Psychology, Industrial"],"dc:title":["Situational factors affecting judgments of future performance and judgment-performance correspondence"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:21Z"}