{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23274"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23274","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Investigation of alternative seismic design procedures for standard buildings","abstract":"\"The seismic design provisions of most building codes in the United States specify ground motion parameters for various regions of the country and provide simple formulas to determine a distribution of lateral forces for which the structure should be designed. The simple formulas typically involve the use of one or more \"\"factors\"\" to account for anticipated inelastic behavior of the structure, relative importance of the structure, and site soil effects. Although these code provisions are very simple to use, they oversimplify a complex problem and are based on many implicit assumptions which many designers may not appreciate. Furthermore, the reliability of the final design is not known. An alternative design and analysis procedure, in which the underlying assumptions are more clearly defined and which provides a more uniform level of reliability in the final design, is presented. The procedure requires the designer to consider two levels of earthquake excitation. \"\"Equivalent\"\" single-degree-of-freedom models and uniform hazard response spectra are used to evaluate structural performance. Deterministic design-checking equations are derived based on displacement-based performance criteria which are expressed in probabilistic terms. The deterministic design equations account for the uncertainty in predicting site soil effects, the uncertainty in seismic hazard, and the approximate nature of the simplified models of the structure through the use of design factors. The goal of the alternative procedure is to enable designers to achieve code-specified target performance objectives for moderate and severe levels of earthquake excitation.\"","abstract_html":""The seismic design provisions of most building codes in the United States specify ground motion parameters for various regions of the country and provide simple formulas to determine a distribution of lateral forces for which the structure should be designed. The simple formulas typically involve the use of one or more ""factors"" to account for anticipated inelastic behavior of the structure, relative importance of the structure, and site soil effects. Although these code provisions are very simple to use, they oversimplify a complex problem and are based on many implicit assumptions which many designers may not appreciate. Furthermore, the reliability of the final design is not known. An alternative design and analysis procedure, in which the underlying assumptions are more clearly defined and which provides a more uniform level of reliability in the final design, is presented. The procedure requires the designer to consider two levels of earthquake excitation. ""Equivalent"" single-degree-of-freedom models and uniform hazard response spectra are used to evaluate structural performance. Deterministic design-checking equations are derived based on displacement-based performance criteria which are expressed in probabilistic terms. The deterministic design equations account for the uncertainty in predicting site soil effects, the uncertainty in seismic hazard, and the approximate nature of the simplified models of the structure through the use of design factors. The goal of the alternative procedure is to enable designers to achieve code-specified target performance objectives for moderate and severe levels of earthquake excitation."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Collins, Kevin Ralph"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Civil and Environmental Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Wen, Y.K.","Foutch, Douglas A."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T14:08:19Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T14:08:19Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:21Z","subjects":["Applied Mechanics","Engineering, Civil"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1995 Collins, Kevin Ralph"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9624323","(UMI)AAI9624323"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9624323","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9624323","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23274","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Wen, Y.K.","Foutch, Douglas A."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Collins, Kevin Ralph"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T14:08:19Z","10000-01-01","1995"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Civil and Environmental Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Applied Mechanics","Engineering, Civil"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1995 Collins, Kevin Ralph"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9624323","(UMI)AAI9624323","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23274"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"The seismic design provisions of most building codes in the United States specify ground motion parameters for various regions of the country and provide simple formulas to determine a distribution of lateral forces for which the structure should be designed. The simple formulas typically involve the use of one or more \"\"factors\"\" to account for anticipated inelastic behavior of the structure, relative importance of the structure, and site soil effects. Although these code provisions are very simple to use, they oversimplify a complex problem and are based on many implicit assumptions which many designers may not appreciate. Furthermore, the reliability of the final design is not known. An alternative design and analysis procedure, in which the underlying assumptions are more clearly defined and which provides a more uniform level of reliability in the final design, is presented. The procedure requires the designer to consider two levels of earthquake excitation. \"\"Equivalent\"\" single-degree-of-freedom models and uniform hazard response spectra are used to evaluate structural performance. Deterministic design-checking equations are derived based on displacement-based performance criteria which are expressed in probabilistic terms. The deterministic design equations account for the uncertainty in predicting site soil effects, the uncertainty in seismic hazard, and the approximate nature of the simplified models of the structure through the use of design factors. The goal of the alternative procedure is to enable designers to achieve code-specified target performance objectives for moderate and severe levels of earthquake excitation.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:08:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9624323.pdf: 7791230 bytes, checksum: 0da5b8c8aa87dc2ac176a6fee97978c5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1995","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:03:22Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:30:12-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Investigation of alternative seismic design procedures for standard buildings"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Wen, Y.K.","Foutch, Douglas A."],"dc:creator":["Collins, Kevin Ralph"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T14:08:19Z","10000-01-01","1995"],"dc:description":["\"The seismic design provisions of most building codes in the United States specify ground motion parameters for various regions of the country and provide simple formulas to determine a distribution of lateral forces for which the structure should be designed. The simple formulas typically involve the use of one or more \"\"factors\"\" to account for anticipated inelastic behavior of the structure, relative importance of the structure, and site soil effects. Although these code provisions are very simple to use, they oversimplify a complex problem and are based on many implicit assumptions which many designers may not appreciate. Furthermore, the reliability of the final design is not known. An alternative design and analysis procedure, in which the underlying assumptions are more clearly defined and which provides a more uniform level of reliability in the final design, is presented. The procedure requires the designer to consider two levels of earthquake excitation. \"\"Equivalent\"\" single-degree-of-freedom models and uniform hazard response spectra are used to evaluate structural performance. Deterministic design-checking equations are derived based on displacement-based performance criteria which are expressed in probabilistic terms. The deterministic design equations account for the uncertainty in predicting site soil effects, the uncertainty in seismic hazard, and the approximate nature of the simplified models of the structure through the use of design factors. The goal of the alternative procedure is to enable designers to achieve code-specified target performance objectives for moderate and severe levels of earthquake excitation.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:08:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9624323.pdf: 7791230 bytes, checksum: 0da5b8c8aa87dc2ac176a6fee97978c5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1995","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:03:22Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:30:12-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9624323","(UMI)AAI9624323","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23274"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1995 Collins, Kevin Ralph"],"dc:subject":["Applied Mechanics","Engineering, Civil"],"dc:title":["Investigation of alternative seismic design procedures for standard buildings"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Civil and Environmental Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:21Z"}