{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23073"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/23073","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Validity and internal consistency of two district-developed assessments of Title I students","abstract":"Reading and writing summaries (teacher ratings of student performances on skills in reading and writing) developed in an Illinois school district for Title I program use were examined for validity and internal consistency. Assessment data were collected on students in grades 1-3 for seven marking periods over two school years. Internal consistency was evaluated through examination of repetitive ratings and multiple generalizability studies, which yielded generally high internal consistency indices for both summaries, but suggested that there were serious problems with many students receiving the same rating on all summary items. Validity for proficiency inferences was examined in analyses of content validity, score comparisons to the Illinois Goal Assessment Program (IGAP) scores in reading and writing, and confidence intervals around proficiency scores, in which support was obtained for the content validity of the reading summaries, but other concerns were raised about proficiency inferences. Validity of instructional inferences received some support in comparison of reading summary scores to the running record of oral reading, and in path analysis models of expected relationships between reading and writing summaries over time. Several actions were recommended to improve internal consistency and validity for proficiency and instructional inferences, such as: including teachers in assessment development and evaluation, examining reliability across multiple raters and occasions, constructing a feasible five-point rating scale for summary rubrics, examination of gains in proficiency, and identification of additional criterion measures and relevant theoretical relationships about reading and writing.","abstract_html":"Reading and writing summaries (teacher ratings of student performances on skills in reading and writing) developed in an Illinois school district for Title I program use were examined for validity and internal consistency. Assessment data were collected on students in grades 1-3 for seven marking periods over two school years. Internal consistency was evaluated through examination of repetitive ratings and multiple generalizability studies, which yielded generally high internal consistency indices for both summaries, but suggested that there were serious problems with many students receiving the same rating on all summary items. Validity for proficiency inferences was examined in analyses of content validity, score comparisons to the Illinois Goal Assessment Program (IGAP) scores in reading and writing, and confidence intervals around proficiency scores, in which support was obtained for the content validity of the reading summaries, but other concerns were raised about proficiency inferences. Validity of instructional inferences received some support in comparison of reading summary scores to the running record of oral reading, and in path analysis models of expected relationships between reading and writing summaries over time. Several actions were recommended to improve internal consistency and validity for proficiency and instructional inferences, such as: including teachers in assessment development and evaluation, examining reliability across multiple raters and occasions, constructing a feasible five-point rating scale for summary rubrics, examination of gains in proficiency, and identification of additional criterion measures and relevant theoretical relationships about reading and writing.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Watkins, Thomas James"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Education","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["DeStefano, Lizanne"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T14:01:12Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T14:01:12Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:21Z","subjects":["Education, Tests and Measurements","Education, Educational Psychology"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1996 Watkins, Thomas James"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591199604","AAI9712478","(UMI)AAI9712478"],"render_values":[{"text":"9780591199604","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"AAI9712478","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9712478","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23073","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["DeStefano, Lizanne"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Watkins, Thomas James"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T14:01:12Z","10000-01-01","1996"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Education, Tests and Measurements","Education, Educational Psychology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1996 Watkins, Thomas James"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591199604","AAI9712478","(UMI)AAI9712478","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23073"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Reading and writing summaries (teacher ratings of student performances on skills in reading and writing) developed in an Illinois school district for Title I program use were examined for validity and internal consistency. Assessment data were collected on students in grades 1-3 for seven marking periods over two school years. Internal consistency was evaluated through examination of repetitive ratings and multiple generalizability studies, which yielded generally high internal consistency indices for both summaries, but suggested that there were serious problems with many students receiving the same rating on all summary items. Validity for proficiency inferences was examined in analyses of content validity, score comparisons to the Illinois Goal Assessment Program (IGAP) scores in reading and writing, and confidence intervals around proficiency scores, in which support was obtained for the content validity of the reading summaries, but other concerns were raised about proficiency inferences. Validity of instructional inferences received some support in comparison of reading summary scores to the running record of oral reading, and in path analysis models of expected relationships between reading and writing summaries over time. Several actions were recommended to improve internal consistency and validity for proficiency and instructional inferences, such as: including teachers in assessment development and evaluation, examining reliability across multiple raters and occasions, constructing a feasible five-point rating scale for summary rubrics, examination of gains in proficiency, and identification of additional criterion measures and relevant theoretical relationships about reading and writing.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:01:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9712478.pdf: 5309651 bytes, checksum: 00780d2f3080d057330f4531371943e1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:01:59Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:29:27-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Validity and internal consistency of two district-developed assessments of Title I students"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["DeStefano, Lizanne"],"dc:creator":["Watkins, Thomas James"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T14:01:12Z","10000-01-01","1996"],"dc:description":["Reading and writing summaries (teacher ratings of student performances on skills in reading and writing) developed in an Illinois school district for Title I program use were examined for validity and internal consistency. Assessment data were collected on students in grades 1-3 for seven marking periods over two school years. Internal consistency was evaluated through examination of repetitive ratings and multiple generalizability studies, which yielded generally high internal consistency indices for both summaries, but suggested that there were serious problems with many students receiving the same rating on all summary items. Validity for proficiency inferences was examined in analyses of content validity, score comparisons to the Illinois Goal Assessment Program (IGAP) scores in reading and writing, and confidence intervals around proficiency scores, in which support was obtained for the content validity of the reading summaries, but other concerns were raised about proficiency inferences. Validity of instructional inferences received some support in comparison of reading summary scores to the running record of oral reading, and in path analysis models of expected relationships between reading and writing summaries over time. Several actions were recommended to improve internal consistency and validity for proficiency and instructional inferences, such as: including teachers in assessment development and evaluation, examining reliability across multiple raters and occasions, constructing a feasible five-point rating scale for summary rubrics, examination of gains in proficiency, and identification of additional criterion measures and relevant theoretical relationships about reading and writing.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T14:01:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9712478.pdf: 5309651 bytes, checksum: 00780d2f3080d057330f4531371943e1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T15:01:59Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:29:27-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["9780591199604","AAI9712478","(UMI)AAI9712478","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23073"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1996 Watkins, Thomas James"],"dc:subject":["Education, Tests and Measurements","Education, Educational Psychology"],"dc:title":["Validity and internal consistency of two district-developed assessments of Title I students"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:21Z"}