{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22389"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22389","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"How affect influences judgement processes","abstract":"That mood affects judgment has been well documented, but exactly how mood affects judgment is still unclear. Two experiments help to clarify the influence of mood on judgment processes. In the first, subjects' likelihood judgments are shown to be influenced by mood, such that there is an interaction between mood and event valence (i.e., whether the event was positive or negative). The best explanation for those results is a hybrid framework combining the mood as information hypothesis and the motivated reasoning framework. The results suggest that both mood and desired outcome serve as items of information that combine with objective information to influence likelihood judgments. This explanation is further supported by the second study, which involves a systematic manipulation of the specificity of the domain in which satisfaction judgments are made. The results of the second study suggest that the effects of mood and desired outcome depend on the specificity of the judgment object and judgment comparison. Based on these results, suggestions are made for judgment processing models. The focus of the suggestions is that judgments involve two parts: the content of the judgment and the context of the judgment. These studies are integrated with previous work to support this suggestion.","abstract_html":"That mood affects judgment has been well documented, but exactly how mood affects judgment is still unclear. Two experiments help to clarify the influence of mood on judgment processes. In the first, subjects' likelihood judgments are shown to be influenced by mood, such that there is an interaction between mood and event valence (i.e., whether the event was positive or negative). The best explanation for those results is a hybrid framework combining the mood as information hypothesis and the motivated reasoning framework. The results suggest that both mood and desired outcome serve as items of information that combine with objective information to influence likelihood judgments. This explanation is further supported by the second study, which involves a systematic manipulation of the specificity of the domain in which satisfaction judgments are made. The results of the second study suggest that the effects of mood and desired outcome depend on the specificity of the judgment object and judgment comparison. Based on these results, suggestions are made for judgment processing models. The focus of the suggestions is that judgments involve two parts: the content of the judgment and the context of the judgment. These studies are integrated with previous work to support this suggestion.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Pritchard, Evan Thackeray"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Clore, Gerald L."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T13:38:17Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T13:38:17Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:19Z","subjects":["Psychology, Social","Psychology, Personality"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1996 Pritchard, Evan Thackeray"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9625182","(UMI)AAI9625182"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9625182","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9625182","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22389","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Clore, Gerald L."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Pritchard, Evan Thackeray"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T13:38:17Z","10000-01-01","1996"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Social","Psychology, Personality"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1996 Pritchard, Evan Thackeray"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9625182","(UMI)AAI9625182","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22389"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["That mood affects judgment has been well documented, but exactly how mood affects judgment is still unclear. Two experiments help to clarify the influence of mood on judgment processes. In the first, subjects' likelihood judgments are shown to be influenced by mood, such that there is an interaction between mood and event valence (i.e., whether the event was positive or negative). The best explanation for those results is a hybrid framework combining the mood as information hypothesis and the motivated reasoning framework. The results suggest that both mood and desired outcome serve as items of information that combine with objective information to influence likelihood judgments. This explanation is further supported by the second study, which involves a systematic manipulation of the specificity of the domain in which satisfaction judgments are made. The results of the second study suggest that the effects of mood and desired outcome depend on the specificity of the judgment object and judgment comparison. Based on these results, suggestions are made for judgment processing models. The focus of the suggestions is that judgments involve two parts: the content of the judgment and the context of the judgment. These studies are integrated with previous work to support this suggestion.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:38:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9625182.pdf: 3708009 bytes, checksum: cbd26c7173c786c39c89fe62061aad30 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:57:17Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:26:51-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["How affect influences judgement processes"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Clore, Gerald L."],"dc:creator":["Pritchard, Evan Thackeray"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T13:38:17Z","10000-01-01","1996"],"dc:description":["That mood affects judgment has been well documented, but exactly how mood affects judgment is still unclear. Two experiments help to clarify the influence of mood on judgment processes. In the first, subjects' likelihood judgments are shown to be influenced by mood, such that there is an interaction between mood and event valence (i.e., whether the event was positive or negative). The best explanation for those results is a hybrid framework combining the mood as information hypothesis and the motivated reasoning framework. The results suggest that both mood and desired outcome serve as items of information that combine with objective information to influence likelihood judgments. This explanation is further supported by the second study, which involves a systematic manipulation of the specificity of the domain in which satisfaction judgments are made. The results of the second study suggest that the effects of mood and desired outcome depend on the specificity of the judgment object and judgment comparison. Based on these results, suggestions are made for judgment processing models. The focus of the suggestions is that judgments involve two parts: the content of the judgment and the context of the judgment. These studies are integrated with previous work to support this suggestion.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:38:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9625182.pdf: 3708009 bytes, checksum: cbd26c7173c786c39c89fe62061aad30 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:57:17Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:26:51-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9625182","(UMI)AAI9625182","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22389"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1996 Pritchard, Evan Thackeray"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Social","Psychology, Personality"],"dc:title":["How affect influences judgement processes"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:19Z"}