{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22032"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22032","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Kantian constructivism and Rawlsian egalitarianism","abstract":"\"This dissertation examines John Rawls's claim that his theory of justice can avoid discussion of \"\"deep metaphysical claims\"\" which communitarians have alleged to be implicit in his theory. It shows that Rawls's Kantian Constructivism and his method of reflective equilibrium can only establish a priority of moral over non-moral considerations when attempting to resolve political-philosophical disputes.\"","abstract_html":""This dissertation examines John Rawls's claim that his theory of justice can avoid discussion of ""deep metaphysical claims"" which communitarians have alleged to be implicit in his theory. It shows that Rawls's Kantian Constructivism and his method of reflective equilibrium can only establish a priority of moral over non-moral considerations when attempting to resolve political-philosophical disputes."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mattlage, Alan Roy"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Philosophy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Baron, Marcia W."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T13:26:47Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T13:26:47Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:19Z","subjects":["Law","Philosophy","Political Science, General"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1993 Mattlage, Alan Roy"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9411711","(UMI)AAI9411711"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9411711","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9411711","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22032","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Baron, Marcia W."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mattlage, Alan Roy"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T13:26:47Z","10000-01-01","1993"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Law","Philosophy","Political Science, General"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1993 Mattlage, Alan Roy"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9411711","(UMI)AAI9411711","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22032"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"This dissertation examines John Rawls's claim that his theory of justice can avoid discussion of \"\"deep metaphysical claims\"\" which communitarians have alleged to be implicit in his theory. It shows that Rawls's Kantian Constructivism and his method of reflective equilibrium can only establish a priority of moral over non-moral considerations when attempting to resolve political-philosophical disputes.\"","The dissertation goes on to show that once metaphysical considerations are admitted into the debate over the proper theory of justice, a plausible theory of freedom argues for an thoroughgoing egalitarian interpretation of Rawls's principles of justice over a libertarian interpretation.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:26:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9411711.pdf: 9393361 bytes, checksum: 8375603ab578b789a91f17c926966913 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1993","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:54:52Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:25:32-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Kantian constructivism and Rawlsian egalitarianism"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Baron, Marcia W."],"dc:creator":["Mattlage, Alan Roy"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T13:26:47Z","10000-01-01","1993"],"dc:description":["\"This dissertation examines John Rawls's claim that his theory of justice can avoid discussion of \"\"deep metaphysical claims\"\" which communitarians have alleged to be implicit in his theory. It shows that Rawls's Kantian Constructivism and his method of reflective equilibrium can only establish a priority of moral over non-moral considerations when attempting to resolve political-philosophical disputes.\"","The dissertation goes on to show that once metaphysical considerations are admitted into the debate over the proper theory of justice, a plausible theory of freedom argues for an thoroughgoing egalitarian interpretation of Rawls's principles of justice over a libertarian interpretation.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:26:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9411711.pdf: 9393361 bytes, checksum: 8375603ab578b789a91f17c926966913 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1993","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:54:52Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:25:32-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9411711","(UMI)AAI9411711","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22032"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1993 Mattlage, Alan Roy"],"dc:subject":["Law","Philosophy","Political Science, General"],"dc:title":["Kantian constructivism and Rawlsian egalitarianism"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Philosophy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:19Z"}