{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22030"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22030","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Migrant labor and farm technical efficiency: Empirical evidence from Lesotho","abstract":"The study estimates and tests for differences in technical inefficiencies for farms with and without migrant workers in Lesotho. It also considers farm size and gender implications for inefficiencies. The stochastic production frontier and logit models are estimated using maximum likelihood procedure.","abstract_html":"The study estimates and tests for differences in technical inefficiencies for farms with and without migrant workers in Lesotho. It also considers farm size and gender implications for inefficiencies. The stochastic production frontier and logit models are estimated using maximum likelihood procedure.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mochebelele, Motsamai T."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Agricultural Economics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Bullock, David S."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T13:26:43Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T13:26:43Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:19Z","subjects":["Economics, Agricultural","Economics, Labor"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1996 Mochebelele, Motsamai T."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591089110","AAI9702612","(UMI)AAI9702612"],"render_values":[{"text":"9780591089110","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"AAI9702612","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9702612","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22030","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Bullock, David S."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mochebelele, Motsamai T."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T13:26:43Z","10000-01-01","1996"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Agricultural Economics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Economics, Agricultural","Economics, Labor"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1996 Mochebelele, Motsamai T."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591089110","AAI9702612","(UMI)AAI9702612","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22030"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The study estimates and tests for differences in technical inefficiencies for farms with and without migrant workers in Lesotho. It also considers farm size and gender implications for inefficiencies. The stochastic production frontier and logit models are estimated using maximum likelihood procedure.","The results showed that all farms were technically inefficient overall, irrespective of whether they participated in migrant labor or not. This suggests opportunities for substantial improvement in productivity given the current farming technology. Based on migrancy status, farms participating in migrant mine employment were found to be significantly less inefficient than the nonmigrant farms. This implies that the benefit from migrant incomes more than offsets the loss of farm labor due to mine employment. A study that fails to account for differences in farms according to their migrancy status could result in misleading policy recommendations because inefficiencies are non-neutral to migrancy status. Moreover, the study points to the importance of improved credit procedures to allow farmers take advantage of timely land preparation and seeding.","An analysis carried out for small, medium and large farms for migrant and nonmigrant sample strata showed productivity was independent of farm size. This implies that increased land holding due to permanent migration to South Africa or collectivization would not guarantee higher productivity across the board.","The results showed that success of farms is invariant to gender of the farm operator. First, a dichotomous analysis led to conclusion that gender did not lead to significant differences in the choice of management practices. Secondly, based on the frontier production analysis, no significant differences were found in average technical inefficiencies between farms managed by women and men.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:26:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9702612.pdf: 4333720 bytes, checksum: ba1851674c5104480ed9c2cd3fb9957f (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:54:51Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:25:31-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Migrant labor and farm technical efficiency: Empirical evidence from Lesotho"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Bullock, David S."],"dc:creator":["Mochebelele, Motsamai T."],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T13:26:43Z","10000-01-01","1996"],"dc:description":["The study estimates and tests for differences in technical inefficiencies for farms with and without migrant workers in Lesotho. It also considers farm size and gender implications for inefficiencies. The stochastic production frontier and logit models are estimated using maximum likelihood procedure.","The results showed that all farms were technically inefficient overall, irrespective of whether they participated in migrant labor or not. This suggests opportunities for substantial improvement in productivity given the current farming technology. Based on migrancy status, farms participating in migrant mine employment were found to be significantly less inefficient than the nonmigrant farms. This implies that the benefit from migrant incomes more than offsets the loss of farm labor due to mine employment. A study that fails to account for differences in farms according to their migrancy status could result in misleading policy recommendations because inefficiencies are non-neutral to migrancy status. Moreover, the study points to the importance of improved credit procedures to allow farmers take advantage of timely land preparation and seeding.","An analysis carried out for small, medium and large farms for migrant and nonmigrant sample strata showed productivity was independent of farm size. This implies that increased land holding due to permanent migration to South Africa or collectivization would not guarantee higher productivity across the board.","The results showed that success of farms is invariant to gender of the farm operator. First, a dichotomous analysis led to conclusion that gender did not lead to significant differences in the choice of management practices. Secondly, based on the frontier production analysis, no significant differences were found in average technical inefficiencies between farms managed by women and men.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:26:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9702612.pdf: 4333720 bytes, checksum: ba1851674c5104480ed9c2cd3fb9957f (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:54:51Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:25:31-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["9780591089110","AAI9702612","(UMI)AAI9702612","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22030"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1996 Mochebelele, Motsamai T."],"dc:subject":["Economics, Agricultural","Economics, Labor"],"dc:title":["Migrant labor and farm technical efficiency: Empirical evidence from Lesotho"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Agricultural Economics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:19Z"}