{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22020"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/22020","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Effects of wheat streak mosaic virus and interactions with other cereal viruses on wheat","abstract":"Yield loss due to disease results from complex interactions between disease development and growth and development of plants. The effects of an Illinois isolate of wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) on yield of selected hard red spring wheat and soft red winter wheat cultivars were evaluated in three studies. In spring and fall of 1993 and 1994, twenty hard red spring wheat cultivars and fourteen soft winter wheat cultivars were planted in yield plots with three replications in a randomised complete block (RCB) design. Seedlings were mechanically inoculated at Feeke's growth stage 2 using an air brush. Controls were non-inoculated plots. Symptoms were rated every 7-8 days beginning one week after inoculation using a 0 to 5 scale, where 0 was no symptoms and 5 was severe stunting and chlorosis. The grain yield, 1,000 kernel weight and plant height were analyzed. There were significant differences among some cultivars for all the traits. Yield reductions in 1993 were greater than in 1994 which may have been caused by the differences in the environmental conditions. In the second study the response of three hard red spring wheat cultivars and four soft winter wheat cultivars when inoculated at different growth stages with WSMV were evaluated in yield plots in a RCB design with 3 replications. Seedlings were mechanically inoculated using an air brush at Feeke's growth stages of 2, 4, 6 and 8. Controls were noninoculated plots. Symptoms were rated as above. The response of the wheat cultivars to inoculation with WSMV at different growth stages was significant (Pr $>$ F = 0.0001) using repeated measures analysis. Analysis using ANOVA and FLSD mean separation showed significant differences in grain yield, 1000 kernel weight and height (P $<$ 0.05) within the cultivars. Butte 86, a tolerant variety, showed less reduction in yield at all growth stages when compared with Marshall and Wheaton. Using the same experimental design and treatments, interaction effects of WSMV and wheat soil-borne mosaic virus (WSBMV) was also evaluated with WSBMV. The effects of both the viruses were severe in 1994-95 and the plots had very low yields. In the third study the analysis of the interactions study between cereal viruses was expanded with the addition of PAV strain of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV-PAV) and brome mosaic virus (BMV). Agronomic traits, and the virus titers were evaluated in the greenhouse. Four different hosts, Marshall, Michigan Amber, (wheat cultivars), Clintland 64 (oats) and Hudson Barley were used. The cultivars were planted in pots using a RCB design with three replications. In one set of treatments the plants were inoculated first mechanically with BMV (bromovirus), WSMV (potyvirus), BYDV-PAV (luteovirus) and then seven to eight days later with the second set of virus. After the second inoculation, the titers of the four viruses were evaluated by ELISA at every one, two, and six weeks, after inoculation and before harvest. The cultivars responded differently to the different inoculations, and the agronomic traits were affected severely by mixed infections of the different viruses.","abstract_html":"Yield loss due to disease results from complex interactions between disease development and growth and development of plants. The effects of an Illinois isolate of wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) on yield of selected hard red spring wheat and soft red winter wheat cultivars were evaluated in three studies. In spring and fall of 1993 and 1994, twenty hard red spring wheat cultivars and fourteen soft winter wheat cultivars were planted in yield plots with three replications in a randomised complete block (RCB) design. Seedlings were mechanically inoculated at Feeke&#x27;s growth stage 2 using an air brush. Controls were non-inoculated plots. Symptoms were rated every 7-8 days beginning one week after inoculation using a 0 to 5 scale, where 0 was no symptoms and 5 was severe stunting and chlorosis. The grain yield, 1,000 kernel weight and plant height were analyzed. There were significant differences among some cultivars for all the traits. Yield reductions in 1993 were greater than in 1994 which may have been caused by the differences in the environmental conditions. In the second study the response of three hard red spring wheat cultivars and four soft winter wheat cultivars when inoculated at different growth stages with WSMV were evaluated in yield plots in a RCB design with 3 replications. Seedlings were mechanically inoculated using an air brush at Feeke&#x27;s growth stages of 2, 4, 6 and 8. Controls were noninoculated plots. Symptoms were rated as above. The response of the wheat cultivars to inoculation with WSMV at different growth stages was significant (Pr $&gt;$ F = 0.0001) using repeated measures analysis. Analysis using ANOVA and FLSD mean separation showed significant differences in grain yield, 1000 kernel weight and height (P $&lt;$ 0.05) within the cultivars. Butte 86, a tolerant variety, showed less reduction in yield at all growth stages when compared with Marshall and Wheaton. Using the same experimental design and treatments, interaction effects of WSMV and wheat soil-borne mosaic virus (WSBMV) was also evaluated with WSBMV. The effects of both the viruses were severe in 1994-95 and the plots had very low yields. In the third study the analysis of the interactions study between cereal viruses was expanded with the addition of PAV strain of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV-PAV) and brome mosaic virus (BMV). Agronomic traits, and the virus titers were evaluated in the greenhouse. Four different hosts, Marshall, Michigan Amber, (wheat cultivars), Clintland 64 (oats) and Hudson Barley were used. The cultivars were planted in pots using a RCB design with three replications. In one set of treatments the plants were inoculated first mechanically with BMV (bromovirus), WSMV (potyvirus), BYDV-PAV (luteovirus) and then seven to eight days later with the second set of virus. After the second inoculation, the titers of the four viruses were evaluated by ELISA at every one, two, and six weeks, after inoculation and before harvest. The cultivars responded differently to the different inoculations, and the agronomic traits were affected severely by mixed infections of the different viruses.","abstract_has_math":true,"creators":["Muratoti, Sharmila"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Crop Sciences","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Hewings, A.D."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T13:26:25Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T13:26:25Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:19Z","subjects":["Agriculture, Agronomy","Biology, Microbiology","Agriculture, Plant Pathology"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1996 Muratoti, Sharmila"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591089257","AAI9702619","(UMI)AAI9702619"],"render_values":[{"text":"9780591089257","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"AAI9702619","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9702619","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22020","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Hewings, A.D."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Muratoti, Sharmila"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T13:26:25Z","10000-01-01","1996"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Crop Sciences"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Agriculture, Agronomy","Biology, Microbiology","Agriculture, Plant Pathology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1996 Muratoti, Sharmila"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591089257","AAI9702619","(UMI)AAI9702619","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22020"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Yield loss due to disease results from complex interactions between disease development and growth and development of plants. The effects of an Illinois isolate of wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) on yield of selected hard red spring wheat and soft red winter wheat cultivars were evaluated in three studies. In spring and fall of 1993 and 1994, twenty hard red spring wheat cultivars and fourteen soft winter wheat cultivars were planted in yield plots with three replications in a randomised complete block (RCB) design. Seedlings were mechanically inoculated at Feeke's growth stage 2 using an air brush. Controls were non-inoculated plots. Symptoms were rated every 7-8 days beginning one week after inoculation using a 0 to 5 scale, where 0 was no symptoms and 5 was severe stunting and chlorosis. The grain yield, 1,000 kernel weight and plant height were analyzed. There were significant differences among some cultivars for all the traits. Yield reductions in 1993 were greater than in 1994 which may have been caused by the differences in the environmental conditions. In the second study the response of three hard red spring wheat cultivars and four soft winter wheat cultivars when inoculated at different growth stages with WSMV were evaluated in yield plots in a RCB design with 3 replications. Seedlings were mechanically inoculated using an air brush at Feeke's growth stages of 2, 4, 6 and 8. Controls were noninoculated plots. Symptoms were rated as above. The response of the wheat cultivars to inoculation with WSMV at different growth stages was significant (Pr $>$ F = 0.0001) using repeated measures analysis. Analysis using ANOVA and FLSD mean separation showed significant differences in grain yield, 1000 kernel weight and height (P $<$ 0.05) within the cultivars. Butte 86, a tolerant variety, showed less reduction in yield at all growth stages when compared with Marshall and Wheaton. Using the same experimental design and treatments, interaction effects of WSMV and wheat soil-borne mosaic virus (WSBMV) was also evaluated with WSBMV. The effects of both the viruses were severe in 1994-95 and the plots had very low yields. In the third study the analysis of the interactions study between cereal viruses was expanded with the addition of PAV strain of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV-PAV) and brome mosaic virus (BMV). Agronomic traits, and the virus titers were evaluated in the greenhouse. Four different hosts, Marshall, Michigan Amber, (wheat cultivars), Clintland 64 (oats) and Hudson Barley were used. The cultivars were planted in pots using a RCB design with three replications. In one set of treatments the plants were inoculated first mechanically with BMV (bromovirus), WSMV (potyvirus), BYDV-PAV (luteovirus) and then seven to eight days later with the second set of virus. After the second inoculation, the titers of the four viruses were evaluated by ELISA at every one, two, and six weeks, after inoculation and before harvest. The cultivars responded differently to the different inoculations, and the agronomic traits were affected severely by mixed infections of the different viruses.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:26:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9702619.pdf: 5998110 bytes, checksum: 31867504b2ff5e64f54aab1cd7f0c546 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:54:47Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:25:29-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Effects of wheat streak mosaic virus and interactions with other cereal viruses on wheat"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Hewings, A.D."],"dc:creator":["Muratoti, Sharmila"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T13:26:25Z","10000-01-01","1996"],"dc:description":["Yield loss due to disease results from complex interactions between disease development and growth and development of plants. The effects of an Illinois isolate of wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) on yield of selected hard red spring wheat and soft red winter wheat cultivars were evaluated in three studies. In spring and fall of 1993 and 1994, twenty hard red spring wheat cultivars and fourteen soft winter wheat cultivars were planted in yield plots with three replications in a randomised complete block (RCB) design. Seedlings were mechanically inoculated at Feeke's growth stage 2 using an air brush. Controls were non-inoculated plots. Symptoms were rated every 7-8 days beginning one week after inoculation using a 0 to 5 scale, where 0 was no symptoms and 5 was severe stunting and chlorosis. The grain yield, 1,000 kernel weight and plant height were analyzed. There were significant differences among some cultivars for all the traits. Yield reductions in 1993 were greater than in 1994 which may have been caused by the differences in the environmental conditions. In the second study the response of three hard red spring wheat cultivars and four soft winter wheat cultivars when inoculated at different growth stages with WSMV were evaluated in yield plots in a RCB design with 3 replications. Seedlings were mechanically inoculated using an air brush at Feeke's growth stages of 2, 4, 6 and 8. Controls were noninoculated plots. Symptoms were rated as above. The response of the wheat cultivars to inoculation with WSMV at different growth stages was significant (Pr $>$ F = 0.0001) using repeated measures analysis. Analysis using ANOVA and FLSD mean separation showed significant differences in grain yield, 1000 kernel weight and height (P $<$ 0.05) within the cultivars. Butte 86, a tolerant variety, showed less reduction in yield at all growth stages when compared with Marshall and Wheaton. Using the same experimental design and treatments, interaction effects of WSMV and wheat soil-borne mosaic virus (WSBMV) was also evaluated with WSBMV. The effects of both the viruses were severe in 1994-95 and the plots had very low yields. In the third study the analysis of the interactions study between cereal viruses was expanded with the addition of PAV strain of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV-PAV) and brome mosaic virus (BMV). Agronomic traits, and the virus titers were evaluated in the greenhouse. Four different hosts, Marshall, Michigan Amber, (wheat cultivars), Clintland 64 (oats) and Hudson Barley were used. The cultivars were planted in pots using a RCB design with three replications. In one set of treatments the plants were inoculated first mechanically with BMV (bromovirus), WSMV (potyvirus), BYDV-PAV (luteovirus) and then seven to eight days later with the second set of virus. After the second inoculation, the titers of the four viruses were evaluated by ELISA at every one, two, and six weeks, after inoculation and before harvest. The cultivars responded differently to the different inoculations, and the agronomic traits were affected severely by mixed infections of the different viruses.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:26:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9702619.pdf: 5998110 bytes, checksum: 31867504b2ff5e64f54aab1cd7f0c546 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:54:47Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:25:29-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["9780591089257","AAI9702619","(UMI)AAI9702619","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/22020"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1996 Muratoti, Sharmila"],"dc:subject":["Agriculture, Agronomy","Biology, Microbiology","Agriculture, Plant Pathology"],"dc:title":["Effects of wheat streak mosaic virus and interactions with other cereal viruses on wheat"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Crop Sciences"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:19Z"}