{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/21937"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/21937","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The role of context in the practice and use of internal evaluation activities: A case study from business and industry","abstract":"Although analyses and subsequent prescriptions about evaluation use either address-only-one-perspective or segregate--and-categorize several, in practice, facilitating use involves consideration of several perspectives simultaneously. This research provided a comprehensive understanding of the practice and use of internal evaluation activities in a particular context: the management of employee training in a business setting. The organization which served as a field site is a producer of multi-media training courses for on-site use by large organizations. Using an evolving case study methodology, the data collection procedures incorporated observations, interviews, and document reviews in the natural, on-going environment of this company.","abstract_html":"Although analyses and subsequent prescriptions about evaluation use either address-only-one-perspective or segregate--and-categorize several, in practice, facilitating use involves consideration of several perspectives simultaneously. This research provided a comprehensive understanding of the practice and use of internal evaluation activities in a particular context: the management of employee training in a business setting. The organization which served as a field site is a producer of multi-media training courses for on-site use by large organizations. Using an evolving case study methodology, the data collection procedures incorporated observations, interviews, and document reviews in the natural, on-going environment of this company.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Torres, Rosalie Tourne"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Education","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Braskamp, Larry A."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T13:23:45Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T13:23:45Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:19Z","subjects":["Business Administration, Management","Education, Administration","Education, Educational Psychology","Education, Business"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1990 Torres, Rosalie Tourne"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9021767","(UMI)AAI9021767"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9021767","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9021767","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21937","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Braskamp, Larry A."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Torres, Rosalie Tourne"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T13:23:45Z","10000-01-01","1990"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Business Administration, Management","Education, Administration","Education, Educational Psychology","Education, Business"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1990 Torres, Rosalie Tourne"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9021767","(UMI)AAI9021767","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21937"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Although analyses and subsequent prescriptions about evaluation use either address-only-one-perspective or segregate--and-categorize several, in practice, facilitating use involves consideration of several perspectives simultaneously. This research provided a comprehensive understanding of the practice and use of internal evaluation activities in a particular context: the management of employee training in a business setting. The organization which served as a field site is a producer of multi-media training courses for on-site use by large organizations. Using an evolving case study methodology, the data collection procedures incorporated observations, interviews, and document reviews in the natural, on-going environment of this company.","The practice and use of activities for the evaluation of employee training was mitigated by a context of constant change and competing priorities. In particular, the company's rapid growth and expansion, and authoritarian management focused decision making about training on needs and solutions, rather than on evaluation and reflection. Evaluation which did occur tended to be informal, largely due to the company's unsystematic training, competing priorities of those responsible for training and its evaluation, and the existence of a quality assurance system which levels.","Influenced by these kinds of contextual factors, internal evaluation has been criticized as suspect and lacking methodological rigor. This study revealed clearly that maintaining quality in internal evaluation is not a matter of working harder to apply a methodology of choice amid overwhelming operational constraints and political influences. Quality is maintained by the internal evaluator who, functioning as a consultant-mediator represents with fairness and sensitivity varying issues and multiple perspectives in an effort to promote empathetic and responsible decision making. Doing so requires specific skills for understanding and managing unique organizational contexts. Those evidenced in this study are (a) establishing appropriate goals for internal evaluation, (b) maximizing rapport, credibility, and trust; (c) raising and representing issues to those in authority; (d) recognizing and valuing the political nature of evaluation; (e) balancing informal and formal evaluation; and (f) maintaining tolerance for ambiguity and incremental change.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:23:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9021767.pdf: 13031515 bytes, checksum: 492e8f52ef49a16c42cea5d8ba1e35e7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1990","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:54:13Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:25:10-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The role of context in the practice and use of internal evaluation activities: A case study from business and industry"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Braskamp, Larry A."],"dc:creator":["Torres, Rosalie Tourne"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T13:23:45Z","10000-01-01","1990"],"dc:description":["Although analyses and subsequent prescriptions about evaluation use either address-only-one-perspective or segregate--and-categorize several, in practice, facilitating use involves consideration of several perspectives simultaneously. This research provided a comprehensive understanding of the practice and use of internal evaluation activities in a particular context: the management of employee training in a business setting. The organization which served as a field site is a producer of multi-media training courses for on-site use by large organizations. Using an evolving case study methodology, the data collection procedures incorporated observations, interviews, and document reviews in the natural, on-going environment of this company.","The practice and use of activities for the evaluation of employee training was mitigated by a context of constant change and competing priorities. In particular, the company's rapid growth and expansion, and authoritarian management focused decision making about training on needs and solutions, rather than on evaluation and reflection. Evaluation which did occur tended to be informal, largely due to the company's unsystematic training, competing priorities of those responsible for training and its evaluation, and the existence of a quality assurance system which levels.","Influenced by these kinds of contextual factors, internal evaluation has been criticized as suspect and lacking methodological rigor. This study revealed clearly that maintaining quality in internal evaluation is not a matter of working harder to apply a methodology of choice amid overwhelming operational constraints and political influences. Quality is maintained by the internal evaluator who, functioning as a consultant-mediator represents with fairness and sensitivity varying issues and multiple perspectives in an effort to promote empathetic and responsible decision making. Doing so requires specific skills for understanding and managing unique organizational contexts. Those evidenced in this study are (a) establishing appropriate goals for internal evaluation, (b) maximizing rapport, credibility, and trust; (c) raising and representing issues to those in authority; (d) recognizing and valuing the political nature of evaluation; (e) balancing informal and formal evaluation; and (f) maintaining tolerance for ambiguity and incremental change.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:23:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9021767.pdf: 13031515 bytes, checksum: 492e8f52ef49a16c42cea5d8ba1e35e7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1990","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:54:13Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:25:10-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9021767","(UMI)AAI9021767","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21937"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1990 Torres, Rosalie Tourne"],"dc:subject":["Business Administration, Management","Education, Administration","Education, Educational Psychology","Education, Business"],"dc:title":["The role of context in the practice and use of internal evaluation activities: A case study from business and industry"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:19Z"}