{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/21868"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/21868","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Agenda formation and the Financial Accounting Standards Board","abstract":"\"The objective of this dissertation was to improve our understanding of why some accounting issues emerge onto the FASB agenda. This necessary condition for the issuance of accounting standards has received no attention in the accounting literature. This paper employs a regulatory space metaphor (Hancher and Moran, 1989) as an organizing framework for seven studies of agenda formation. The use of the regulatory space metaphor recognizes the complexity of the standard-setting and agenda formation processes. The studies of agenda formation also form a basis for initial efforts to develop the theoretical contours of the regulatory space in which accounting standard-setting occurs. In particular, these studies suggest two ways to refocus our thinking about the standard-setting and agenda processes. (1) Accounting problems are not obvious. Accounting issues are interpreted as problems. (2) Agenda formation is not a simple yes/no decision. Agenda formation is a process in which the standard-setter may take many actions. These actions are at least partially the result of an assessment of \"\"appropriateness\"\" of action (March and Olsen, 1989) by the standard-setter.\"","abstract_html":""The objective of this dissertation was to improve our understanding of why some accounting issues emerge onto the FASB agenda. This necessary condition for the issuance of accounting standards has received no attention in the accounting literature. This paper employs a regulatory space metaphor (Hancher and Moran, 1989) as an organizing framework for seven studies of agenda formation. The use of the regulatory space metaphor recognizes the complexity of the standard-setting and agenda formation processes. The studies of agenda formation also form a basis for initial efforts to develop the theoretical contours of the regulatory space in which accounting standard-setting occurs. In particular, these studies suggest two ways to refocus our thinking about the standard-setting and agenda processes. (1) Accounting problems are not obvious. Accounting issues are interpreted as problems. (2) Agenda formation is not a simple yes/no decision. Agenda formation is a process in which the standard-setter may take many actions. These actions are at least partially the result of an assessment of ""appropriateness"" of action (March and Olsen, 1989) by the standard-setter."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Young, Joni J."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Accountancy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Johnson, Orace"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T13:21:39Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T13:21:39Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:18Z","subjects":["Business Administration, Accounting"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1991 Young, Joni J."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9211052","(UMI)AAI9211052"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9211052","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9211052","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21868","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Johnson, Orace"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Young, Joni J."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T13:21:39Z","10000-01-01","1991"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Accountancy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Business Administration, Accounting"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1991 Young, Joni J."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9211052","(UMI)AAI9211052","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21868"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"The objective of this dissertation was to improve our understanding of why some accounting issues emerge onto the FASB agenda. This necessary condition for the issuance of accounting standards has received no attention in the accounting literature. This paper employs a regulatory space metaphor (Hancher and Moran, 1989) as an organizing framework for seven studies of agenda formation. The use of the regulatory space metaphor recognizes the complexity of the standard-setting and agenda formation processes. The studies of agenda formation also form a basis for initial efforts to develop the theoretical contours of the regulatory space in which accounting standard-setting occurs. In particular, these studies suggest two ways to refocus our thinking about the standard-setting and agenda processes. (1) Accounting problems are not obvious. Accounting issues are interpreted as problems. (2) Agenda formation is not a simple yes/no decision. Agenda formation is a process in which the standard-setter may take many actions. These actions are at least partially the result of an assessment of \"\"appropriateness\"\" of action (March and Olsen, 1989) by the standard-setter.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:21:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9211052.pdf: 9402507 bytes, checksum: 13e44a3c8fea9003ae96a0fbc53d9453 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:53:44Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:24:53-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Agenda formation and the Financial Accounting Standards Board"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Johnson, Orace"],"dc:creator":["Young, Joni J."],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T13:21:39Z","10000-01-01","1991"],"dc:description":["\"The objective of this dissertation was to improve our understanding of why some accounting issues emerge onto the FASB agenda. This necessary condition for the issuance of accounting standards has received no attention in the accounting literature. This paper employs a regulatory space metaphor (Hancher and Moran, 1989) as an organizing framework for seven studies of agenda formation. The use of the regulatory space metaphor recognizes the complexity of the standard-setting and agenda formation processes. The studies of agenda formation also form a basis for initial efforts to develop the theoretical contours of the regulatory space in which accounting standard-setting occurs. In particular, these studies suggest two ways to refocus our thinking about the standard-setting and agenda processes. (1) Accounting problems are not obvious. Accounting issues are interpreted as problems. (2) Agenda formation is not a simple yes/no decision. Agenda formation is a process in which the standard-setter may take many actions. These actions are at least partially the result of an assessment of \"\"appropriateness\"\" of action (March and Olsen, 1989) by the standard-setter.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:21:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9211052.pdf: 9402507 bytes, checksum: 13e44a3c8fea9003ae96a0fbc53d9453 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:53:44Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:24:53-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9211052","(UMI)AAI9211052","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21868"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1991 Young, Joni J."],"dc:subject":["Business Administration, Accounting"],"dc:title":["Agenda formation and the Financial Accounting Standards Board"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Accountancy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:18Z"}