{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/21864"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/21864","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Mood and moderation: Alternative images of Senate reelection seeking behavior","abstract":"Representation requires a degree of responsiveness on the part of legislators to voter preferences. This effort examines a model of responsiveness built on an ideological voter-senator linkage and implicitly confined to only the last stage of each senator's term and finds it wanting. Given cognitive limitations of the voters and behavioral constraints on senators' behavior, responsiveness based on ideology, and confined only to the period immediately preceding the next election, is unlikely to be electorally rewarding. An alternative model is proposed, one that does not make unreasonable assumptions regarding the abilities and interests of the voters and does not confine responsiveness to the cycles of election. Instead, public mood change is offered as the primary tool of communication between legislator and voter. Cues drawn from changing public attitudes are used by senators to reevaluate behavior and adapt to anticipated voter preferences. This responsiveness is not confined to the waning years of the term but, rather, is pervasive, affecting behavior in every year of the senator's tenure.","abstract_html":"Representation requires a degree of responsiveness on the part of legislators to voter preferences. This effort examines a model of responsiveness built on an ideological voter-senator linkage and implicitly confined to only the last stage of each senator's term and finds it wanting. Given cognitive limitations of the voters and behavioral constraints on senators' behavior, responsiveness based on ideology, and confined only to the period immediately preceding the next election, is unlikely to be electorally rewarding. An alternative model is proposed, one that does not make unreasonable assumptions regarding the abilities and interests of the voters and does not confine responsiveness to the cycles of election. Instead, public mood change is offered as the primary tool of communication between legislator and voter. Cues drawn from changing public attitudes are used by senators to reevaluate behavior and adapt to anticipated voter preferences. This responsiveness is not confined to the waning years of the term but, rather, is pervasive, affecting behavior in every year of the senator's tenure.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Segura, Gary Michael"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Political Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Kuklinski, James H."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T13:21:32Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T13:21:32Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:18Z","subjects":["Political Science, General"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1992 Segura, Gary Michael"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9305689","(UMI)AAI9305689"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9305689","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9305689","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21864","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Kuklinski, James H."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Segura, Gary Michael"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T13:21:32Z","10000-01-01","1992"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Political Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Political Science, General"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1992 Segura, Gary Michael"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9305689","(UMI)AAI9305689","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21864"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Representation requires a degree of responsiveness on the part of legislators to voter preferences. This effort examines a model of responsiveness built on an ideological voter-senator linkage and implicitly confined to only the last stage of each senator's term and finds it wanting. Given cognitive limitations of the voters and behavioral constraints on senators' behavior, responsiveness based on ideology, and confined only to the period immediately preceding the next election, is unlikely to be electorally rewarding. An alternative model is proposed, one that does not make unreasonable assumptions regarding the abilities and interests of the voters and does not confine responsiveness to the cycles of election. Instead, public mood change is offered as the primary tool of communication between legislator and voter. Cues drawn from changing public attitudes are used by senators to reevaluate behavior and adapt to anticipated voter preferences. This responsiveness is not confined to the waning years of the term but, rather, is pervasive, affecting behavior in every year of the senator's tenure.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:21:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9305689.pdf: 6493251 bytes, checksum: e308f397da40e8ca2724606dd95c94d5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1992","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:53:43Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:24:53-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Mood and moderation: Alternative images of Senate reelection seeking behavior"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Kuklinski, James H."],"dc:creator":["Segura, Gary Michael"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T13:21:32Z","10000-01-01","1992"],"dc:description":["Representation requires a degree of responsiveness on the part of legislators to voter preferences. This effort examines a model of responsiveness built on an ideological voter-senator linkage and implicitly confined to only the last stage of each senator's term and finds it wanting. Given cognitive limitations of the voters and behavioral constraints on senators' behavior, responsiveness based on ideology, and confined only to the period immediately preceding the next election, is unlikely to be electorally rewarding. An alternative model is proposed, one that does not make unreasonable assumptions regarding the abilities and interests of the voters and does not confine responsiveness to the cycles of election. Instead, public mood change is offered as the primary tool of communication between legislator and voter. Cues drawn from changing public attitudes are used by senators to reevaluate behavior and adapt to anticipated voter preferences. This responsiveness is not confined to the waning years of the term but, rather, is pervasive, affecting behavior in every year of the senator's tenure.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:21:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9305689.pdf: 6493251 bytes, checksum: e308f397da40e8ca2724606dd95c94d5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1992","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:53:43Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:24:53-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9305689","(UMI)AAI9305689","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21864"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1992 Segura, Gary Michael"],"dc:subject":["Political Science, General"],"dc:title":["Mood and moderation: Alternative images of Senate reelection seeking behavior"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Political Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:18Z"}