{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/21800"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/21800","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Developmental trends in similarity as structural alignment: Evidence from children's performance in mapping tasks","abstract":"\"Young children find tasks in which object similarity is pitted against relational similarity difficult. However, there is a developmental improvement in the ability to use relational similarity. We investigated the effects of object similarity and relational similarity on children's performance in an analogical mapping task. Our experimental task was designed to be a challenging analogical mapping task in which a response based on either object similarity or relational similarity was possible, although only relational similarity was correct. In a series of experiments, 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children were tested using this task. It was found that young children are affected by the salience of the object-similarity choices in this task; both 3- and 4-year-olds responded based on object similarity when the objects used were rich in object attributes and responded based on relational similarity when the objects used were sparse and simple. Five-year-olds, however, performed quite well with both stimulus types, thus showing a developmental improvement in this task. In a further set of experiments, the use of familiar labels (\"\"Daddy,\"\" \"\"Mommy,\"\" and \"\"Baby\"\") were used to increase children's ability to use relational similarity with both types of stimuli in the previous task. When these familiar labels were used, 3-year-old children's ability to use relational similarity in the presence of competing object similarity increased.\"","abstract_html":"&quot;Young children find tasks in which object similarity is pitted against relational similarity difficult. However, there is a developmental improvement in the ability to use relational similarity. We investigated the effects of object similarity and relational similarity on children&#x27;s performance in an analogical mapping task. Our experimental task was designed to be a challenging analogical mapping task in which a response based on either object similarity or relational similarity was possible, although only relational similarity was correct. In a series of experiments, 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children were tested using this task. It was found that young children are affected by the salience of the object-similarity choices in this task; both 3- and 4-year-olds responded based on object similarity when the objects used were rich in object attributes and responded based on relational similarity when the objects used were sparse and simple. Five-year-olds, however, performed quite well with both stimulus types, thus showing a developmental improvement in this task. In a further set of experiments, the use of familiar labels (&quot;&quot;Daddy,&quot;&quot; &quot;&quot;Mommy,&quot;&quot; and &quot;&quot;Baby&quot;&quot;) were used to increase children&#x27;s ability to use relational similarity with both types of stimuli in the previous task. When these familiar labels were used, 3-year-old children&#x27;s ability to use relational similarity in the presence of competing object similarity increased.&quot;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Rattermann, Mary Jo"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["DeLoache, Judy S."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T13:19:31Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T13:19:31Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:18Z","subjects":["Psychology, Developmental"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1991 Rattermann, Mary Jo"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9210959","(UMI)AAI9210959"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9210959","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9210959","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21800","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["DeLoache, Judy S."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Rattermann, Mary Jo"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T13:19:31Z","10000-01-01","1991"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Developmental"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1991 Rattermann, Mary Jo"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9210959","(UMI)AAI9210959","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21800"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"Young children find tasks in which object similarity is pitted against relational similarity difficult. However, there is a developmental improvement in the ability to use relational similarity. We investigated the effects of object similarity and relational similarity on children's performance in an analogical mapping task. Our experimental task was designed to be a challenging analogical mapping task in which a response based on either object similarity or relational similarity was possible, although only relational similarity was correct. In a series of experiments, 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children were tested using this task. It was found that young children are affected by the salience of the object-similarity choices in this task; both 3- and 4-year-olds responded based on object similarity when the objects used were rich in object attributes and responded based on relational similarity when the objects used were sparse and simple. Five-year-olds, however, performed quite well with both stimulus types, thus showing a developmental improvement in this task. In a further set of experiments, the use of familiar labels (\"\"Daddy,\"\" \"\"Mommy,\"\" and \"\"Baby\"\") were used to increase children's ability to use relational similarity with both types of stimuli in the previous task. When these familiar labels were used, 3-year-old children's ability to use relational similarity in the presence of competing object similarity increased.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:19:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9210959.pdf: 4308307 bytes, checksum: cf58b5df655d69604c1aa8ed14bdff96 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:53:17Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:24:37-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Developmental trends in similarity as structural alignment: Evidence from children's performance in mapping tasks"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["DeLoache, Judy S."],"dc:creator":["Rattermann, Mary Jo"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T13:19:31Z","10000-01-01","1991"],"dc:description":["\"Young children find tasks in which object similarity is pitted against relational similarity difficult. However, there is a developmental improvement in the ability to use relational similarity. We investigated the effects of object similarity and relational similarity on children's performance in an analogical mapping task. Our experimental task was designed to be a challenging analogical mapping task in which a response based on either object similarity or relational similarity was possible, although only relational similarity was correct. In a series of experiments, 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children were tested using this task. It was found that young children are affected by the salience of the object-similarity choices in this task; both 3- and 4-year-olds responded based on object similarity when the objects used were rich in object attributes and responded based on relational similarity when the objects used were sparse and simple. Five-year-olds, however, performed quite well with both stimulus types, thus showing a developmental improvement in this task. In a further set of experiments, the use of familiar labels (\"\"Daddy,\"\" \"\"Mommy,\"\" and \"\"Baby\"\") were used to increase children's ability to use relational similarity with both types of stimuli in the previous task. When these familiar labels were used, 3-year-old children's ability to use relational similarity in the presence of competing object similarity increased.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T13:19:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9210959.pdf: 4308307 bytes, checksum: cf58b5df655d69604c1aa8ed14bdff96 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:53:17Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:24:37-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9210959","(UMI)AAI9210959","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/21800"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1991 Rattermann, Mary Jo"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Developmental"],"dc:title":["Developmental trends in similarity as structural alignment: Evidence from children's performance in mapping tasks"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:18Z"}