{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20987"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20987","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The effects of accountability, justification and consensus on a decision-maker's information search behavior","abstract":"\"This study attempted to address three major issues. First, to extend the Information Search model (Cooper and Sniezek, 1990) to explain the decision-making process under varying levels of consensus and accountability. Second, to examine, in detail, the relative effects of inter-adviser consensus and judge-adviser consensus on the decision-making process. Third, to enhance the conceptualization of accountability (Tetlock, 1983) as a psychological phenomenon. The method employed was a simulated Judge-Adviser System, in which all subjects were judges. The subjects made decisions regarding a hypothetical investment decision. The subjects had the option of obtaining information from their \"\"advisers\"\" to aid in the decision-making process. A 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was used with inter-adviser and judge-adviser consensus forming the first two factors and accountability and justification forming the remaining factors. Dependent measures included, confidence levels, amount of information search, and decision revision. Results indicate that the information search model is generally supported. Judge-adviser consensus has strong effects, although inter-adviser consensus resulted in some interesting interactions with accountability. Last, accountability and justification resulted in different decision-maker behaviors in terms of information search and confidence.\"","abstract_html":""This study attempted to address three major issues. First, to extend the Information Search model (Cooper and Sniezek, 1990) to explain the decision-making process under varying levels of consensus and accountability. Second, to examine, in detail, the relative effects of inter-adviser consensus and judge-adviser consensus on the decision-making process. Third, to enhance the conceptualization of accountability (Tetlock, 1983) as a psychological phenomenon. The method employed was a simulated Judge-Adviser System, in which all subjects were judges. The subjects made decisions regarding a hypothetical investment decision. The subjects had the option of obtaining information from their ""advisers"" to aid in the decision-making process. A 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was used with inter-adviser and judge-adviser consensus forming the first two factors and accountability and justification forming the remaining factors. Dependent measures included, confidence levels, amount of information search, and decision revision. Results indicate that the information search model is generally supported. Judge-adviser consensus has strong effects, although inter-adviser consensus resulted in some interesting interactions with accountability. Last, accountability and justification resulted in different decision-maker behaviors in terms of information search and confidence."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Cooper, Russell Stevens"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Sniezek, Janet A."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T12:55:02Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T12:55:02Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:17Z","subjects":["Psychology, Social","Psychology, Industrial"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1995 Cooper, Russell Stevens"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9543561","(UMI)AAI9543561"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9543561","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9543561","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20987","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Sniezek, Janet A."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Cooper, Russell Stevens"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T12:55:02Z","10000-01-01","1995"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Social","Psychology, Industrial"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1995 Cooper, Russell Stevens"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9543561","(UMI)AAI9543561","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20987"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"This study attempted to address three major issues. First, to extend the Information Search model (Cooper and Sniezek, 1990) to explain the decision-making process under varying levels of consensus and accountability. Second, to examine, in detail, the relative effects of inter-adviser consensus and judge-adviser consensus on the decision-making process. Third, to enhance the conceptualization of accountability (Tetlock, 1983) as a psychological phenomenon. The method employed was a simulated Judge-Adviser System, in which all subjects were judges. The subjects made decisions regarding a hypothetical investment decision. The subjects had the option of obtaining information from their \"\"advisers\"\" to aid in the decision-making process. A 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was used with inter-adviser and judge-adviser consensus forming the first two factors and accountability and justification forming the remaining factors. Dependent measures included, confidence levels, amount of information search, and decision revision. Results indicate that the information search model is generally supported. Judge-adviser consensus has strong effects, although inter-adviser consensus resulted in some interesting interactions with accountability. Last, accountability and justification resulted in different decision-maker behaviors in terms of information search and confidence.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:55:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9543561.pdf: 5684394 bytes, checksum: f413904dc117ac987cc02dd7576f8cf2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1995","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:47:43Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:21:33-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The effects of accountability, justification and consensus on a decision-maker's information search behavior"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Sniezek, Janet A."],"dc:creator":["Cooper, Russell Stevens"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T12:55:02Z","10000-01-01","1995"],"dc:description":["\"This study attempted to address three major issues. First, to extend the Information Search model (Cooper and Sniezek, 1990) to explain the decision-making process under varying levels of consensus and accountability. Second, to examine, in detail, the relative effects of inter-adviser consensus and judge-adviser consensus on the decision-making process. Third, to enhance the conceptualization of accountability (Tetlock, 1983) as a psychological phenomenon. The method employed was a simulated Judge-Adviser System, in which all subjects were judges. The subjects made decisions regarding a hypothetical investment decision. The subjects had the option of obtaining information from their \"\"advisers\"\" to aid in the decision-making process. A 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was used with inter-adviser and judge-adviser consensus forming the first two factors and accountability and justification forming the remaining factors. Dependent measures included, confidence levels, amount of information search, and decision revision. Results indicate that the information search model is generally supported. Judge-adviser consensus has strong effects, although inter-adviser consensus resulted in some interesting interactions with accountability. Last, accountability and justification resulted in different decision-maker behaviors in terms of information search and confidence.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:55:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9543561.pdf: 5684394 bytes, checksum: f413904dc117ac987cc02dd7576f8cf2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1995","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:47:43Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:21:33-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9543561","(UMI)AAI9543561","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20987"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1995 Cooper, Russell Stevens"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Social","Psychology, Industrial"],"dc:title":["The effects of accountability, justification and consensus on a decision-maker's information search behavior"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:17Z"}