{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20961"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20961","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Retrieval strategies in memory-based automaticity","abstract":"A new approach to the role of attention in memory-based automaticity is presented. The retrieval strategy hypothesis asserts that people attend to stimuli in whatever way will optimize the retrieval of past solutions from memory. Different retrieval strategies can compete against each other over time, with new ones emerging at different levels of practice. The set of viable retrieval strategies from which subjects select can be determined by a task analysis in terms of three principles. These principles allow specific predictions to be made about the retrieval strategies people will use, with implications for both immediate performance, and for encoding, which affects future performance. Predictions were tested in four enumeration experiments. Results supported the retrieval strategy hypothesis, and included evidence that some subjects had switched attention from one stimulus component to another for the purpose of optimizing retrieval.","abstract_html":"A new approach to the role of attention in memory-based automaticity is presented. The retrieval strategy hypothesis asserts that people attend to stimuli in whatever way will optimize the retrieval of past solutions from memory. Different retrieval strategies can compete against each other over time, with new ones emerging at different levels of practice. The set of viable retrieval strategies from which subjects select can be determined by a task analysis in terms of three principles. These principles allow specific predictions to be made about the retrieval strategies people will use, with implications for both immediate performance, and for encoding, which affects future performance. Predictions were tested in four enumeration experiments. Results supported the retrieval strategy hypothesis, and included evidence that some subjects had switched attention from one stimulus component to another for the purpose of optimizing retrieval.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Compton, Brian Jeffery"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Logan, Gordon D."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T12:54:17Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T12:54:17Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:17Z","subjects":["Education, Educational Psychology","Psychology, Cognitive"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1996 Compton, Brian Jeffery"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591087512","AAI9702487","(UMI)AAI9702487"],"render_values":[{"text":"9780591087512","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"AAI9702487","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9702487","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20961","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Logan, Gordon D."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Compton, Brian Jeffery"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T12:54:17Z","10000-01-01","1996"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Education, Educational Psychology","Psychology, Cognitive"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1996 Compton, Brian Jeffery"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591087512","AAI9702487","(UMI)AAI9702487","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20961"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["A new approach to the role of attention in memory-based automaticity is presented. The retrieval strategy hypothesis asserts that people attend to stimuli in whatever way will optimize the retrieval of past solutions from memory. Different retrieval strategies can compete against each other over time, with new ones emerging at different levels of practice. The set of viable retrieval strategies from which subjects select can be determined by a task analysis in terms of three principles. These principles allow specific predictions to be made about the retrieval strategies people will use, with implications for both immediate performance, and for encoding, which affects future performance. Predictions were tested in four enumeration experiments. Results supported the retrieval strategy hypothesis, and included evidence that some subjects had switched attention from one stimulus component to another for the purpose of optimizing retrieval.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:54:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9702487.pdf: 6910290 bytes, checksum: 11b6e87c2fea9854e12334900cbaa318 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:47:32Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:21:28-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Retrieval strategies in memory-based automaticity"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Logan, Gordon D."],"dc:creator":["Compton, Brian Jeffery"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T12:54:17Z","10000-01-01","1996"],"dc:description":["A new approach to the role of attention in memory-based automaticity is presented. The retrieval strategy hypothesis asserts that people attend to stimuli in whatever way will optimize the retrieval of past solutions from memory. Different retrieval strategies can compete against each other over time, with new ones emerging at different levels of practice. The set of viable retrieval strategies from which subjects select can be determined by a task analysis in terms of three principles. These principles allow specific predictions to be made about the retrieval strategies people will use, with implications for both immediate performance, and for encoding, which affects future performance. Predictions were tested in four enumeration experiments. Results supported the retrieval strategy hypothesis, and included evidence that some subjects had switched attention from one stimulus component to another for the purpose of optimizing retrieval.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:54:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9702487.pdf: 6910290 bytes, checksum: 11b6e87c2fea9854e12334900cbaa318 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:47:32Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:21:28-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["9780591087512","AAI9702487","(UMI)AAI9702487","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20961"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1996 Compton, Brian Jeffery"],"dc:subject":["Education, Educational Psychology","Psychology, Cognitive"],"dc:title":["Retrieval strategies in memory-based automaticity"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:17Z"}