{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20799"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20799","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"A computational approach to display layout analysis","abstract":"The positioning of large numbers of displays and controls in complex, dynamic systems presents a formidable task to the systems designer, whose ultimate goal is to facilitate the efficient performance of the human-machine system. The focus of the present study is on identifying and evaluating an objective, computational approach to display layout analysis, with an emphasis on determining the relative importance of three display layout principles: display grouping, display priority and stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility. Six pilots in each of eight conditions flew an instrument flight simulation of a light fixed-wing aircraft, performing various flight control and systems monitoring tasks. Both qualitative (subjective) and computational (objective) assessments were made as to the adherence of each display condition to each of the three display layout principles, and these, in turn, were compared with a variety of specific and global flight performance measures. Stepwise regression techniques revealed that display grouping plays a dominant role over display priority when these two factors are in opposition, suggesting that displays should be located so as to minimize their distance from other, task-related displays, even at the expense of being moved further away from the primary fixation areas of the display panel.","abstract_html":"The positioning of large numbers of displays and controls in complex, dynamic systems presents a formidable task to the systems designer, whose ultimate goal is to facilitate the efficient performance of the human-machine system. The focus of the present study is on identifying and evaluating an objective, computational approach to display layout analysis, with an emphasis on determining the relative importance of three display layout principles: display grouping, display priority and stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility. Six pilots in each of eight conditions flew an instrument flight simulation of a light fixed-wing aircraft, performing various flight control and systems monitoring tasks. Both qualitative (subjective) and computational (objective) assessments were made as to the adherence of each display condition to each of the three display layout principles, and these, in turn, were compared with a variety of specific and global flight performance measures. Stepwise regression techniques revealed that display grouping plays a dominant role over display priority when these two factors are in opposition, suggesting that displays should be located so as to minimize their distance from other, task-related displays, even at the expense of being moved further away from the primary fixation areas of the display panel.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Andre, Anthony David"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Wickens, Christopher D."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T12:49:37Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T12:49:37Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:16Z","subjects":["Psychology, Experimental","Engineering, System Science"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1992 Andre, Anthony David"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9215769","(UMI)AAI9215769"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9215769","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9215769","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20799","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Wickens, Christopher D."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Andre, Anthony David"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T12:49:37Z","10000-01-01","1992"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Experimental","Engineering, System Science"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1992 Andre, Anthony David"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9215769","(UMI)AAI9215769","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20799"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The positioning of large numbers of displays and controls in complex, dynamic systems presents a formidable task to the systems designer, whose ultimate goal is to facilitate the efficient performance of the human-machine system. The focus of the present study is on identifying and evaluating an objective, computational approach to display layout analysis, with an emphasis on determining the relative importance of three display layout principles: display grouping, display priority and stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility. Six pilots in each of eight conditions flew an instrument flight simulation of a light fixed-wing aircraft, performing various flight control and systems monitoring tasks. Both qualitative (subjective) and computational (objective) assessments were made as to the adherence of each display condition to each of the three display layout principles, and these, in turn, were compared with a variety of specific and global flight performance measures. Stepwise regression techniques revealed that display grouping plays a dominant role over display priority when these two factors are in opposition, suggesting that displays should be located so as to minimize their distance from other, task-related displays, even at the expense of being moved further away from the primary fixation areas of the display panel.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:49:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9215769.pdf: 4153476 bytes, checksum: 17ef22ac72b0ecb3b795663875c3c3c1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1992","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:46:21Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:20:44-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A computational approach to display layout analysis"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Wickens, Christopher D."],"dc:creator":["Andre, Anthony David"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T12:49:37Z","10000-01-01","1992"],"dc:description":["The positioning of large numbers of displays and controls in complex, dynamic systems presents a formidable task to the systems designer, whose ultimate goal is to facilitate the efficient performance of the human-machine system. The focus of the present study is on identifying and evaluating an objective, computational approach to display layout analysis, with an emphasis on determining the relative importance of three display layout principles: display grouping, display priority and stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility. Six pilots in each of eight conditions flew an instrument flight simulation of a light fixed-wing aircraft, performing various flight control and systems monitoring tasks. Both qualitative (subjective) and computational (objective) assessments were made as to the adherence of each display condition to each of the three display layout principles, and these, in turn, were compared with a variety of specific and global flight performance measures. Stepwise regression techniques revealed that display grouping plays a dominant role over display priority when these two factors are in opposition, suggesting that displays should be located so as to minimize their distance from other, task-related displays, even at the expense of being moved further away from the primary fixation areas of the display panel.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:49:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9215769.pdf: 4153476 bytes, checksum: 17ef22ac72b0ecb3b795663875c3c3c1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1992","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:46:21Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:20:44-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9215769","(UMI)AAI9215769","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20799"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1992 Andre, Anthony David"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Experimental","Engineering, System Science"],"dc:title":["A computational approach to display layout analysis"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:16Z"}