{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20243"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20243","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"College students with a disability attempting science, engineering, or mathematics studies: Fourteen case studies","abstract":"\"Fourteen college students in science, engineering, or mathematics (SEM) programs who have a vision/hearing/motor impairment were interviewed to investigate: (1) What might explain why proportionately fewer students with disabilities pursue SEM than others? (2) In light of those factors, why and how do these exceptional \"\"survivors\"\" pursue collegiate SEM studies? After the interviews, a portrait was written for eleven students. The resulting diverse stories show only two commonalities: (1) All were mainstreamed into regular schools--although many were originally denied access. (2) All have been undergoing an intensive search for answers regarding disability and beyond, which evidently shaped their outlook and priorities. This appears consistent with their two categories for pursuing SEM: (1) They had an inherent fascination with SEM since youth, or (2) they found a way to use SEM to reach some charitable goal, consistent with their priorities. Once either of these intrinsic motivations was instilled, extrinsic factors proved to curb or boost their SEM success, all of which require reexamination to make SEM more accessible. These factors include technology, societal attitudes, innovative instruction, and mainstreaming.\"","abstract_html":""Fourteen college students in science, engineering, or mathematics (SEM) programs who have a vision/hearing/motor impairment were interviewed to investigate: (1) What might explain why proportionately fewer students with disabilities pursue SEM than others? (2) In light of those factors, why and how do these exceptional ""survivors"" pursue collegiate SEM studies? After the interviews, a portrait was written for eleven students. The resulting diverse stories show only two commonalities: (1) All were mainstreamed into regular schools--although many were originally denied access. (2) All have been undergoing an intensive search for answers regarding disability and beyond, which evidently shaped their outlook and priorities. This appears consistent with their two categories for pursuing SEM: (1) They had an inherent fascination with SEM since youth, or (2) they found a way to use SEM to reach some charitable goal, consistent with their priorities. Once either of these intrinsic motivations was instilled, extrinsic factors proved to curb or boost their SEM success, all of which require reexamination to make SEM more accessible. These factors include technology, societal attitudes, innovative instruction, and mainstreaming."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Caldwell, Jennifer Christine"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Education","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Travers, Kenneth J."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T12:33:24Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T12:33:24Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:15Z","subjects":["Education, Mathematics","Education, Special","Education, Technology of","Education, Sciences","Education, Curriculum and Instruction"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1996 Caldwell, Jennifer Christine"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591197525","AAI9712211","(UMI)AAI9712211"],"render_values":[{"text":"9780591197525","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"AAI9712211","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9712211","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20243","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Travers, Kenneth J."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Caldwell, Jennifer Christine"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T12:33:24Z","10000-01-01","1996"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Education, Mathematics","Education, Special","Education, Technology of","Education, Sciences","Education, Curriculum and Instruction"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1996 Caldwell, Jennifer Christine"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591197525","AAI9712211","(UMI)AAI9712211","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20243"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"Fourteen college students in science, engineering, or mathematics (SEM) programs who have a vision/hearing/motor impairment were interviewed to investigate: (1) What might explain why proportionately fewer students with disabilities pursue SEM than others? (2) In light of those factors, why and how do these exceptional \"\"survivors\"\" pursue collegiate SEM studies? After the interviews, a portrait was written for eleven students. The resulting diverse stories show only two commonalities: (1) All were mainstreamed into regular schools--although many were originally denied access. (2) All have been undergoing an intensive search for answers regarding disability and beyond, which evidently shaped their outlook and priorities. This appears consistent with their two categories for pursuing SEM: (1) They had an inherent fascination with SEM since youth, or (2) they found a way to use SEM to reach some charitable goal, consistent with their priorities. Once either of these intrinsic motivations was instilled, extrinsic factors proved to curb or boost their SEM success, all of which require reexamination to make SEM more accessible. These factors include technology, societal attitudes, innovative instruction, and mainstreaming.\"","\"Current underrepresentation is attributed to (1) the lateness of the current \"\"wave\"\" of accommodating/including individuals with disabilities and of technological solutions, and (2) to the apparent inconsistencies between SEM's image and the value system of these students. Suggestions for boosting representation empathize targeting the non-disabled population more than students with disabilities; such students do not generally require \"\"fixing\"\" but their able-bodied peers, instructors, policy-makers, and potential employers require enlightenment on misconceptions and accommodations. Suggestions to students with disabilities include pursuing challenging SEM programs and considering personally meaningful applications of SEM, as do the featured students of this study.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:33:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9712211.pdf: 12316097 bytes, checksum: 9563b65e9b1202fddffdeb4689a02225 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:42:35Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:18:32-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["College students with a disability attempting science, engineering, or mathematics studies: Fourteen case studies"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Travers, Kenneth J."],"dc:creator":["Caldwell, Jennifer Christine"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T12:33:24Z","10000-01-01","1996"],"dc:description":["\"Fourteen college students in science, engineering, or mathematics (SEM) programs who have a vision/hearing/motor impairment were interviewed to investigate: (1) What might explain why proportionately fewer students with disabilities pursue SEM than others? (2) In light of those factors, why and how do these exceptional \"\"survivors\"\" pursue collegiate SEM studies? After the interviews, a portrait was written for eleven students. The resulting diverse stories show only two commonalities: (1) All were mainstreamed into regular schools--although many were originally denied access. (2) All have been undergoing an intensive search for answers regarding disability and beyond, which evidently shaped their outlook and priorities. This appears consistent with their two categories for pursuing SEM: (1) They had an inherent fascination with SEM since youth, or (2) they found a way to use SEM to reach some charitable goal, consistent with their priorities. Once either of these intrinsic motivations was instilled, extrinsic factors proved to curb or boost their SEM success, all of which require reexamination to make SEM more accessible. These factors include technology, societal attitudes, innovative instruction, and mainstreaming.\"","\"Current underrepresentation is attributed to (1) the lateness of the current \"\"wave\"\" of accommodating/including individuals with disabilities and of technological solutions, and (2) to the apparent inconsistencies between SEM's image and the value system of these students. Suggestions for boosting representation empathize targeting the non-disabled population more than students with disabilities; such students do not generally require \"\"fixing\"\" but their able-bodied peers, instructors, policy-makers, and potential employers require enlightenment on misconceptions and accommodations. Suggestions to students with disabilities include pursuing challenging SEM programs and considering personally meaningful applications of SEM, as do the featured students of this study.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:33:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9712211.pdf: 12316097 bytes, checksum: 9563b65e9b1202fddffdeb4689a02225 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:42:35Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:18:32-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["9780591197525","AAI9712211","(UMI)AAI9712211","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20243"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1996 Caldwell, Jennifer Christine"],"dc:subject":["Education, Mathematics","Education, Special","Education, Technology of","Education, Sciences","Education, Curriculum and Instruction"],"dc:title":["College students with a disability attempting science, engineering, or mathematics studies: Fourteen case studies"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:15Z"}