{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20134"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20134","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Resource allocation in dysthymia and anhedonia","abstract":"Prior psychophysiological research has shown that dysthymic individuals are hyporesponsive during information processing tasks. This can be interpreted as evidence of a deficit in the availability or allocation of processing resources. The present research addressed this possibility by comparing dysthymics to anhedonic and normal control subjects in a dual-task paradigm. Reaction time, performance accuracy, and the P300 component of the event-related brain potential were employed as measures of the attentional resources directed to memory tasks, under conditions of varying task priority and difficulty. As expected, dysthymics and anhedonics did not differ from controls on performance measures. However, compared to control subjects, dysthymics and anhedonics responded differentially to priority manipulations as indexed by P300 amplitude. Specifically, dysthymics and anhedonics failed to show changes in resource allocation with shifts in task priority under certain conditions. Dysthymics and anhedonics also exhibited a consistently smaller P300. Taken together, the data suggest that dysthymics and anhedonics are deficient in the allocation of resources rather than the overall level of available resources.","abstract_html":"Prior psychophysiological research has shown that dysthymic individuals are hyporesponsive during information processing tasks. This can be interpreted as evidence of a deficit in the availability or allocation of processing resources. The present research addressed this possibility by comparing dysthymics to anhedonic and normal control subjects in a dual-task paradigm. Reaction time, performance accuracy, and the P300 component of the event-related brain potential were employed as measures of the attentional resources directed to memory tasks, under conditions of varying task priority and difficulty. As expected, dysthymics and anhedonics did not differ from controls on performance measures. However, compared to control subjects, dysthymics and anhedonics responded differentially to priority manipulations as indexed by P300 amplitude. Specifically, dysthymics and anhedonics failed to show changes in resource allocation with shifts in task priority under certain conditions. Dysthymics and anhedonics also exhibited a consistently smaller P300. Taken together, the data suggest that dysthymics and anhedonics are deficient in the allocation of resources rather than the overall level of available resources.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Yee, Cindy May"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Miller, Gregory A."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T12:29:55Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T12:29:55Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:15Z","subjects":["Psychology, Psychobiology","Psychology, Clinical","Psychology, Experimental"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1991 Yee, Cindy May"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9211049","(UMI)AAI9211049"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9211049","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9211049","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20134","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Miller, Gregory A."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Yee, Cindy May"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T12:29:55Z","10000-01-01","1991"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Psychobiology","Psychology, Clinical","Psychology, Experimental"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1991 Yee, Cindy May"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9211049","(UMI)AAI9211049","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20134"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Prior psychophysiological research has shown that dysthymic individuals are hyporesponsive during information processing tasks. This can be interpreted as evidence of a deficit in the availability or allocation of processing resources. The present research addressed this possibility by comparing dysthymics to anhedonic and normal control subjects in a dual-task paradigm. Reaction time, performance accuracy, and the P300 component of the event-related brain potential were employed as measures of the attentional resources directed to memory tasks, under conditions of varying task priority and difficulty. As expected, dysthymics and anhedonics did not differ from controls on performance measures. However, compared to control subjects, dysthymics and anhedonics responded differentially to priority manipulations as indexed by P300 amplitude. Specifically, dysthymics and anhedonics failed to show changes in resource allocation with shifts in task priority under certain conditions. Dysthymics and anhedonics also exhibited a consistently smaller P300. Taken together, the data suggest that dysthymics and anhedonics are deficient in the allocation of resources rather than the overall level of available resources.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:29:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9211049.pdf: 3649062 bytes, checksum: e43dc5d745700cd0bc4229b19526a0fb (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:41:47Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:18:07-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Resource allocation in dysthymia and anhedonia"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Miller, Gregory A."],"dc:creator":["Yee, Cindy May"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T12:29:55Z","10000-01-01","1991"],"dc:description":["Prior psychophysiological research has shown that dysthymic individuals are hyporesponsive during information processing tasks. This can be interpreted as evidence of a deficit in the availability or allocation of processing resources. The present research addressed this possibility by comparing dysthymics to anhedonic and normal control subjects in a dual-task paradigm. Reaction time, performance accuracy, and the P300 component of the event-related brain potential were employed as measures of the attentional resources directed to memory tasks, under conditions of varying task priority and difficulty. As expected, dysthymics and anhedonics did not differ from controls on performance measures. However, compared to control subjects, dysthymics and anhedonics responded differentially to priority manipulations as indexed by P300 amplitude. Specifically, dysthymics and anhedonics failed to show changes in resource allocation with shifts in task priority under certain conditions. Dysthymics and anhedonics also exhibited a consistently smaller P300. Taken together, the data suggest that dysthymics and anhedonics are deficient in the allocation of resources rather than the overall level of available resources.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:29:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9211049.pdf: 3649062 bytes, checksum: e43dc5d745700cd0bc4229b19526a0fb (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:41:47Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:18:07-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9211049","(UMI)AAI9211049","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20134"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1991 Yee, Cindy May"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Psychobiology","Psychology, Clinical","Psychology, Experimental"],"dc:title":["Resource allocation in dysthymia and anhedonia"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:15Z"}