{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20019"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/20019","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Cartographies of undomesticated ground: Nature and feminism in American women's fiction and theory","abstract":"\"My dissertation examines how American women writers from the early nineteenth century to the present have rearticulated the gendered ideologies of nature. Insights from feminist theory, cultural studies, and interdisciplinary postmodern theories of nature enable me to reveal how women's texts transform the representations promoted by literary, popular, and political discourses. By analyzing environmental and feminist history--including original documents from the progressive women's conservation movement--I demonstrate how a diverse array of fiction transfigures the ideologies of nature for feminist, and sometimes environmentalist ends. Informed by feminist and poststructuralist theory, this study also critiques the way these theories have distanced themselves from the category of nature. In contrast, I argue that \"\"nature\"\" has been and continues to be a crucial site for feminist cultural intervention.\"","abstract_html":""My dissertation examines how American women writers from the early nineteenth century to the present have rearticulated the gendered ideologies of nature. Insights from feminist theory, cultural studies, and interdisciplinary postmodern theories of nature enable me to reveal how women's texts transform the representations promoted by literary, popular, and political discourses. By analyzing environmental and feminist history--including original documents from the progressive women's conservation movement--I demonstrate how a diverse array of fiction transfigures the ideologies of nature for feminist, and sometimes environmentalist ends. Informed by feminist and poststructuralist theory, this study also critiques the way these theories have distanced themselves from the category of nature. In contrast, I argue that ""nature"" has been and continues to be a crucial site for feminist cultural intervention."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Alaimo, Stacy"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Literature, American","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Nelson, Cary"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T12:26:13Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T12:26:13Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:15Z","subjects":["American Studies","Women's Studies","Literature, American","Environmental Sciences"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1994 Alaimo, Stacy"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9503127","(UMI)AAI9503127"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9503127","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9503127","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20019","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Nelson, Cary"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Alaimo, Stacy"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T12:26:13Z","10000-01-01","1994"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Literature, American","English"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["American Studies","Women's Studies","Literature, American","Environmental Sciences"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1994 Alaimo, Stacy"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9503127","(UMI)AAI9503127","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20019"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"My dissertation examines how American women writers from the early nineteenth century to the present have rearticulated the gendered ideologies of nature. Insights from feminist theory, cultural studies, and interdisciplinary postmodern theories of nature enable me to reveal how women's texts transform the representations promoted by literary, popular, and political discourses. By analyzing environmental and feminist history--including original documents from the progressive women's conservation movement--I demonstrate how a diverse array of fiction transfigures the ideologies of nature for feminist, and sometimes environmentalist ends. Informed by feminist and poststructuralist theory, this study also critiques the way these theories have distanced themselves from the category of nature. In contrast, I argue that \"\"nature\"\" has been and continues to be a crucial site for feminist cultural intervention.\"","Although much feminist theory shuns the category of nature, the first chapter demonstrates that a persistent tradition of women's fiction, starting with Sedgwick's Hope Leslie, has depicted nature as a liberating, undomesticated space--but one that is racially marked. Chapter Two argues that Mary Austin challenged the ideology of the Women's Progressive Conservation Movement, which promoted female domesticity and a utilitarian conception of nature. Austin's startling creation of a sexual but not domesticated land offers women a figure of identification outside the home by depicting nature as a force that exceeds and resists mastery. From Emma Goldman through Marxist-feminist theories and novels of the thirties, I argue in Chapter Three that radical women project pastoral visions to demand social justice. During the struggle for reproductive rights, however, many novels dramatize how nature is not a liberating space but a trap, since reproduction is a natural disaster.","\"Chapter Four explores the work of Toni Morrison, Margaret Atwood, Leslie Silko, Jane Rule, Marian Engel, and Octavia Butler; the next chapter contrasts ecofeminism, Donna Haraway's theories, and several popular culture \"\"texts.\"\" By forging connections between feminist epistemologies and an interdisciplinary range of postmodern theories of nature, I argue that casting nature as postmodern opens up possibilities for feminists to ally themselves with nature while at the same time warding off detrimental associations between \"\"woman\"\" and \"\"nature.\"\"\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:26:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9503127.pdf: 13824819 bytes, checksum: e2f8902d839cc2202ff56ee038a53913 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1994","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:41:00Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:17:41-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Cartographies of undomesticated ground: Nature and feminism in American women's fiction and theory"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Nelson, Cary"],"dc:creator":["Alaimo, Stacy"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T12:26:13Z","10000-01-01","1994"],"dc:description":["\"My dissertation examines how American women writers from the early nineteenth century to the present have rearticulated the gendered ideologies of nature. Insights from feminist theory, cultural studies, and interdisciplinary postmodern theories of nature enable me to reveal how women's texts transform the representations promoted by literary, popular, and political discourses. By analyzing environmental and feminist history--including original documents from the progressive women's conservation movement--I demonstrate how a diverse array of fiction transfigures the ideologies of nature for feminist, and sometimes environmentalist ends. Informed by feminist and poststructuralist theory, this study also critiques the way these theories have distanced themselves from the category of nature. In contrast, I argue that \"\"nature\"\" has been and continues to be a crucial site for feminist cultural intervention.\"","Although much feminist theory shuns the category of nature, the first chapter demonstrates that a persistent tradition of women's fiction, starting with Sedgwick's Hope Leslie, has depicted nature as a liberating, undomesticated space--but one that is racially marked. Chapter Two argues that Mary Austin challenged the ideology of the Women's Progressive Conservation Movement, which promoted female domesticity and a utilitarian conception of nature. Austin's startling creation of a sexual but not domesticated land offers women a figure of identification outside the home by depicting nature as a force that exceeds and resists mastery. From Emma Goldman through Marxist-feminist theories and novels of the thirties, I argue in Chapter Three that radical women project pastoral visions to demand social justice. During the struggle for reproductive rights, however, many novels dramatize how nature is not a liberating space but a trap, since reproduction is a natural disaster.","\"Chapter Four explores the work of Toni Morrison, Margaret Atwood, Leslie Silko, Jane Rule, Marian Engel, and Octavia Butler; the next chapter contrasts ecofeminism, Donna Haraway's theories, and several popular culture \"\"texts.\"\" By forging connections between feminist epistemologies and an interdisciplinary range of postmodern theories of nature, I argue that casting nature as postmodern opens up possibilities for feminists to ally themselves with nature while at the same time warding off detrimental associations between \"\"woman\"\" and \"\"nature.\"\"\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:26:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9503127.pdf: 13824819 bytes, checksum: e2f8902d839cc2202ff56ee038a53913 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1994","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:41:00Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:17:41-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9503127","(UMI)AAI9503127","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/20019"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1994 Alaimo, Stacy"],"dc:subject":["American Studies","Women's Studies","Literature, American","Environmental Sciences"],"dc:title":["Cartographies of undomesticated ground: Nature and feminism in American women's fiction and theory"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Literature, American","English"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:15Z"}