{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/19727"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/19727","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"How informants report about interorganizational relationships","abstract":"\"This dissertation applies cognitive psychology perspectives to investigate how organizational informants report about interorganizational relationships within an industrial channel of distribution. There is currently a growing interest among both practitioners and scholars in understanding the determinants of successful interorganizational relationships. However many of the variables believed to be related to successful interorganizational relationships are unobservable and the difficulty of obtaining valid measures of these latent constructs continue to challenge researchers. This difficulty is compounded when the more rigorous multiple informant methods are used. In the past, work on the quality of multiple informant reports has concentrated on measuring the variance in multiple informant reports rather than on understanding how or why this variation occurs. Since the vast majority of the empirical work investigating interorganizational relationships have used surveys for data collection, this project draws on the growing literature that has applied cognitive psychology perspectives to understand how survey respondents report about themselves and how proxy-respondents report about close others. This research extends this literature and identifies both the cognitive processes and data sources used by informants when reporting about their organization, and examines how agreement, or consensus, among multiple informant reports is related to the type of information being sought by the survey question and the similarity of the cognitive processes and data sources used by the informants. Hour-long \"\"thinkaloud\"\" interviews were conducted with 109 informants from 35 industrial manufacturing firms who answered questions asking about their firm's relationship with two of its downstream channel partners. Findings include recommendations for improving organizational surveys.\"","abstract_html":""This dissertation applies cognitive psychology perspectives to investigate how organizational informants report about interorganizational relationships within an industrial channel of distribution. There is currently a growing interest among both practitioners and scholars in understanding the determinants of successful interorganizational relationships. However many of the variables believed to be related to successful interorganizational relationships are unobservable and the difficulty of obtaining valid measures of these latent constructs continue to challenge researchers. This difficulty is compounded when the more rigorous multiple informant methods are used. In the past, work on the quality of multiple informant reports has concentrated on measuring the variance in multiple informant reports rather than on understanding how or why this variation occurs. Since the vast majority of the empirical work investigating interorganizational relationships have used surveys for data collection, this project draws on the growing literature that has applied cognitive psychology perspectives to understand how survey respondents report about themselves and how proxy-respondents report about close others. This research extends this literature and identifies both the cognitive processes and data sources used by informants when reporting about their organization, and examines how agreement, or consensus, among multiple informant reports is related to the type of information being sought by the survey question and the similarity of the cognitive processes and data sources used by the informants. Hour-long ""thinkaloud"" interviews were conducted with 109 informants from 35 industrial manufacturing firms who answered questions asking about their firm's relationship with two of its downstream channel partners. Findings include recommendations for improving organizational surveys."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Phillips, Joan M."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Business Administration","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Sudman, Seymour"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T12:16:36Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T12:16:36Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:14Z","subjects":["Business Administration, General","Business Administration, Marketing","Psychology, Industrial"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1996 Phillips, Joan M."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591200362","AAI9712407","(UMI)AAI9712407"],"render_values":[{"text":"9780591200362","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"AAI9712407","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9712407","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19727","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Sudman, Seymour"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Phillips, Joan M."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T12:16:36Z","10000-01-01","1996"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Business Administration"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Business Administration, General","Business Administration, Marketing","Psychology, Industrial"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1996 Phillips, Joan M."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["9780591200362","AAI9712407","(UMI)AAI9712407","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19727"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"This dissertation applies cognitive psychology perspectives to investigate how organizational informants report about interorganizational relationships within an industrial channel of distribution. There is currently a growing interest among both practitioners and scholars in understanding the determinants of successful interorganizational relationships. However many of the variables believed to be related to successful interorganizational relationships are unobservable and the difficulty of obtaining valid measures of these latent constructs continue to challenge researchers. This difficulty is compounded when the more rigorous multiple informant methods are used. In the past, work on the quality of multiple informant reports has concentrated on measuring the variance in multiple informant reports rather than on understanding how or why this variation occurs. Since the vast majority of the empirical work investigating interorganizational relationships have used surveys for data collection, this project draws on the growing literature that has applied cognitive psychology perspectives to understand how survey respondents report about themselves and how proxy-respondents report about close others. This research extends this literature and identifies both the cognitive processes and data sources used by informants when reporting about their organization, and examines how agreement, or consensus, among multiple informant reports is related to the type of information being sought by the survey question and the similarity of the cognitive processes and data sources used by the informants. Hour-long \"\"thinkaloud\"\" interviews were conducted with 109 informants from 35 industrial manufacturing firms who answered questions asking about their firm's relationship with two of its downstream channel partners. Findings include recommendations for improving organizational surveys.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:16:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9712407.pdf: 6114638 bytes, checksum: 55b2d944020da9ec196594aabd02f6e1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:39:01Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:16:21-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["How informants report about interorganizational relationships"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Sudman, Seymour"],"dc:creator":["Phillips, Joan M."],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T12:16:36Z","10000-01-01","1996"],"dc:description":["\"This dissertation applies cognitive psychology perspectives to investigate how organizational informants report about interorganizational relationships within an industrial channel of distribution. There is currently a growing interest among both practitioners and scholars in understanding the determinants of successful interorganizational relationships. However many of the variables believed to be related to successful interorganizational relationships are unobservable and the difficulty of obtaining valid measures of these latent constructs continue to challenge researchers. This difficulty is compounded when the more rigorous multiple informant methods are used. In the past, work on the quality of multiple informant reports has concentrated on measuring the variance in multiple informant reports rather than on understanding how or why this variation occurs. Since the vast majority of the empirical work investigating interorganizational relationships have used surveys for data collection, this project draws on the growing literature that has applied cognitive psychology perspectives to understand how survey respondents report about themselves and how proxy-respondents report about close others. This research extends this literature and identifies both the cognitive processes and data sources used by informants when reporting about their organization, and examines how agreement, or consensus, among multiple informant reports is related to the type of information being sought by the survey question and the similarity of the cognitive processes and data sources used by the informants. Hour-long \"\"thinkaloud\"\" interviews were conducted with 109 informants from 35 industrial manufacturing firms who answered questions asking about their firm's relationship with two of its downstream channel partners. Findings include recommendations for improving organizational surveys.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:16:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9712407.pdf: 6114638 bytes, checksum: 55b2d944020da9ec196594aabd02f6e1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1996","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:39:01Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:16:21-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["9780591200362","AAI9712407","(UMI)AAI9712407","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19727"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1996 Phillips, Joan M."],"dc:subject":["Business Administration, General","Business Administration, Marketing","Psychology, Industrial"],"dc:title":["How informants report about interorganizational relationships"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Business Administration"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:14Z"}