{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/19643"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/19643","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Visual perception of moving objects: Effects of velocity and direction","abstract":"The reported experiments were designed to examine the relation between changes in velocity and direction of travel on the perception of a moving object. The effect of these changes on time-to-contact judgements was also investigated. Despite the extensive literature studying the perception of velocity, no substantive conclusions can be drawn as to the relationship between differing motion functions and predictions about time-to-contact. Little has been done to determine bow the perceived velocity changes as a function of the direction of travel in 3-D space. Time-to-contact estimates of objects travelling in different directions relative to the observer has also received little attention. The following two experiments set out to address these two issues. The results of Experiment 1 indicate that objects travelling on a head-on approach to an observer are perceived as travelling faster than those travelling in either an oblique or transverse direction, given the same actual velocity. It is suggested that the symmetrical expansion of any texture element on the object, has a more significant affordance to the observer. This leads to more conservative responses to avoid contact. Experiment 2 set out to investigate this prediction. The results of Experiment 2 show that observer errors in time-to-contact predictions increase with increases in velocity and as the direction of travel moves away from head-on approaches to motion perpendicular to the line of observation. The symmetrical expansion of objects on a head-on approach is a stronger stimulus for making predictions compared to the rate of constriction of the optical gap between the objects and the target. However, these head-on motions also produced significant underestimations of time-to-contact predictions. The results are explained using an affordance theory interpretation in that head-on approaches afford collision for the observer.","abstract_html":"The reported experiments were designed to examine the relation between changes in velocity and direction of travel on the perception of a moving object. The effect of these changes on time-to-contact judgements was also investigated. Despite the extensive literature studying the perception of velocity, no substantive conclusions can be drawn as to the relationship between differing motion functions and predictions about time-to-contact. Little has been done to determine bow the perceived velocity changes as a function of the direction of travel in 3-D space. Time-to-contact estimates of objects travelling in different directions relative to the observer has also received little attention. The following two experiments set out to address these two issues. The results of Experiment 1 indicate that objects travelling on a head-on approach to an observer are perceived as travelling faster than those travelling in either an oblique or transverse direction, given the same actual velocity. It is suggested that the symmetrical expansion of any texture element on the object, has a more significant affordance to the observer. This leads to more conservative responses to avoid contact. Experiment 2 set out to investigate this prediction. The results of Experiment 2 show that observer errors in time-to-contact predictions increase with increases in velocity and as the direction of travel moves away from head-on approaches to motion perpendicular to the line of observation. The symmetrical expansion of objects on a head-on approach is a stronger stimulus for making predictions compared to the rate of constriction of the optical gap between the objects and the target. However, these head-on motions also produced significant underestimations of time-to-contact predictions. The results are explained using an affordance theory interpretation in that head-on approaches afford collision for the observer.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Antoniou, Alexandros"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Kinesiology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Newell, Karl M."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T12:13:56Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T12:13:56Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:14Z","subjects":["Psychology, Experimental"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1992 Antoniou, Alexandros"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9215770","(UMI)AAI9215770"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9215770","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9215770","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19643","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Newell, Karl M."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Antoniou, Alexandros"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T12:13:56Z","10000-01-01","1992"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Kinesiology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Experimental"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1992 Antoniou, Alexandros"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9215770","(UMI)AAI9215770","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19643"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The reported experiments were designed to examine the relation between changes in velocity and direction of travel on the perception of a moving object. The effect of these changes on time-to-contact judgements was also investigated. Despite the extensive literature studying the perception of velocity, no substantive conclusions can be drawn as to the relationship between differing motion functions and predictions about time-to-contact. Little has been done to determine bow the perceived velocity changes as a function of the direction of travel in 3-D space. Time-to-contact estimates of objects travelling in different directions relative to the observer has also received little attention. The following two experiments set out to address these two issues. The results of Experiment 1 indicate that objects travelling on a head-on approach to an observer are perceived as travelling faster than those travelling in either an oblique or transverse direction, given the same actual velocity. It is suggested that the symmetrical expansion of any texture element on the object, has a more significant affordance to the observer. This leads to more conservative responses to avoid contact. Experiment 2 set out to investigate this prediction. The results of Experiment 2 show that observer errors in time-to-contact predictions increase with increases in velocity and as the direction of travel moves away from head-on approaches to motion perpendicular to the line of observation. The symmetrical expansion of objects on a head-on approach is a stronger stimulus for making predictions compared to the rate of constriction of the optical gap between the objects and the target. However, these head-on motions also produced significant underestimations of time-to-contact predictions. The results are explained using an affordance theory interpretation in that head-on approaches afford collision for the observer.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:13:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9215770.pdf: 5388598 bytes, checksum: e6e123da4e3813884e73aca2984627c1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1992","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:38:27Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:16:02-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Visual perception of moving objects: Effects of velocity and direction"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Newell, Karl M."],"dc:creator":["Antoniou, Alexandros"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T12:13:56Z","10000-01-01","1992"],"dc:description":["The reported experiments were designed to examine the relation between changes in velocity and direction of travel on the perception of a moving object. The effect of these changes on time-to-contact judgements was also investigated. Despite the extensive literature studying the perception of velocity, no substantive conclusions can be drawn as to the relationship between differing motion functions and predictions about time-to-contact. Little has been done to determine bow the perceived velocity changes as a function of the direction of travel in 3-D space. Time-to-contact estimates of objects travelling in different directions relative to the observer has also received little attention. The following two experiments set out to address these two issues. The results of Experiment 1 indicate that objects travelling on a head-on approach to an observer are perceived as travelling faster than those travelling in either an oblique or transverse direction, given the same actual velocity. It is suggested that the symmetrical expansion of any texture element on the object, has a more significant affordance to the observer. This leads to more conservative responses to avoid contact. Experiment 2 set out to investigate this prediction. The results of Experiment 2 show that observer errors in time-to-contact predictions increase with increases in velocity and as the direction of travel moves away from head-on approaches to motion perpendicular to the line of observation. The symmetrical expansion of objects on a head-on approach is a stronger stimulus for making predictions compared to the rate of constriction of the optical gap between the objects and the target. However, these head-on motions also produced significant underestimations of time-to-contact predictions. The results are explained using an affordance theory interpretation in that head-on approaches afford collision for the observer.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:13:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9215770.pdf: 5388598 bytes, checksum: e6e123da4e3813884e73aca2984627c1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1992","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:38:27Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:16:02-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9215770","(UMI)AAI9215770","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19643"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1992 Antoniou, Alexandros"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Experimental"],"dc:title":["Visual perception of moving objects: Effects of velocity and direction"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Kinesiology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:14Z"}