{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/19537"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/19537","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Compatibility in the visual field and the use of nontraditional flight displays","abstract":"Two visual-spatial tasks were time-shared in an experiment to investigate the possibility of a compatibility mapping between the type of task (object-identification or motion-judgment) and the presentation location of the task in the visual field (central or peripheral). The attentional costs associated with time-sharing visual-spatial tasks were also addressed. The use of non-traditional flight displays to reduce visual overload in the cockpit was also explored. Three flight displays (central, peripheral, flow-field) were employed between subjects and the task types and locations were manipulated within groups. The results showed that (1) the type of task determined how quickly it was performed, while the location determines how accurately it was performed; (2) two peripheral tasks were found to interfere more than one central and one peripheral task, or two central tasks; (3) the flow-field display allowed for the most efficient time-sharing, suggesting further investigation into the use of non-traditional flight displays for the reduction of central visual overload in the cockpit. These results suggest that regardless of the task type, peripheral tasks are more demanding than central tasks. While limited evidence was found to support the compatibility hypothesis, no evidence was found to support the hypothesis that central and peripheral vision constitute separate resources.","abstract_html":"Two visual-spatial tasks were time-shared in an experiment to investigate the possibility of a compatibility mapping between the type of task (object-identification or motion-judgment) and the presentation location of the task in the visual field (central or peripheral). The attentional costs associated with time-sharing visual-spatial tasks were also addressed. The use of non-traditional flight displays to reduce visual overload in the cockpit was also explored. Three flight displays (central, peripheral, flow-field) were employed between subjects and the task types and locations were manipulated within groups. The results showed that (1) the type of task determined how quickly it was performed, while the location determines how accurately it was performed; (2) two peripheral tasks were found to interfere more than one central and one peripheral task, or two central tasks; (3) the flow-field display allowed for the most efficient time-sharing, suggesting further investigation into the use of non-traditional flight displays for the reduction of central visual overload in the cockpit. These results suggest that regardless of the task type, peripheral tasks are more demanding than central tasks. While limited evidence was found to support the compatibility hypothesis, no evidence was found to support the hypothesis that central and peripheral vision constitute separate resources.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Weinstein, Lisa F."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Wickens, Christopher D."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T12:10:37Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T12:10:37Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:14Z","subjects":["Engineering, Aerospace","Psychology, Experimental"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1990 Weinstein, Lisa F."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9021774","(UMI)AAI9021774"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9021774","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9021774","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19537","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Wickens, Christopher D."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Weinstein, Lisa F."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T12:10:37Z","10000-01-01","1990"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Engineering, Aerospace","Psychology, Experimental"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1990 Weinstein, Lisa F."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9021774","(UMI)AAI9021774","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19537"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Two visual-spatial tasks were time-shared in an experiment to investigate the possibility of a compatibility mapping between the type of task (object-identification or motion-judgment) and the presentation location of the task in the visual field (central or peripheral). The attentional costs associated with time-sharing visual-spatial tasks were also addressed. The use of non-traditional flight displays to reduce visual overload in the cockpit was also explored. Three flight displays (central, peripheral, flow-field) were employed between subjects and the task types and locations were manipulated within groups. The results showed that (1) the type of task determined how quickly it was performed, while the location determines how accurately it was performed; (2) two peripheral tasks were found to interfere more than one central and one peripheral task, or two central tasks; (3) the flow-field display allowed for the most efficient time-sharing, suggesting further investigation into the use of non-traditional flight displays for the reduction of central visual overload in the cockpit. These results suggest that regardless of the task type, peripheral tasks are more demanding than central tasks. While limited evidence was found to support the compatibility hypothesis, no evidence was found to support the hypothesis that central and peripheral vision constitute separate resources.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:10:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9021774.pdf: 4205216 bytes, checksum: 7c3d6fe6a783550f419093c4dcfc80ea (MD5) Previous issue date: 1990","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:37:42Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:15:33-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Compatibility in the visual field and the use of nontraditional flight displays"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Wickens, Christopher D."],"dc:creator":["Weinstein, Lisa F."],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T12:10:37Z","10000-01-01","1990"],"dc:description":["Two visual-spatial tasks were time-shared in an experiment to investigate the possibility of a compatibility mapping between the type of task (object-identification or motion-judgment) and the presentation location of the task in the visual field (central or peripheral). The attentional costs associated with time-sharing visual-spatial tasks were also addressed. The use of non-traditional flight displays to reduce visual overload in the cockpit was also explored. Three flight displays (central, peripheral, flow-field) were employed between subjects and the task types and locations were manipulated within groups. The results showed that (1) the type of task determined how quickly it was performed, while the location determines how accurately it was performed; (2) two peripheral tasks were found to interfere more than one central and one peripheral task, or two central tasks; (3) the flow-field display allowed for the most efficient time-sharing, suggesting further investigation into the use of non-traditional flight displays for the reduction of central visual overload in the cockpit. These results suggest that regardless of the task type, peripheral tasks are more demanding than central tasks. While limited evidence was found to support the compatibility hypothesis, no evidence was found to support the hypothesis that central and peripheral vision constitute separate resources.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:10:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9021774.pdf: 4205216 bytes, checksum: 7c3d6fe6a783550f419093c4dcfc80ea (MD5) Previous issue date: 1990","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:37:42Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:15:33-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9021774","(UMI)AAI9021774","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19537"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1990 Weinstein, Lisa F."],"dc:subject":["Engineering, Aerospace","Psychology, Experimental"],"dc:title":["Compatibility in the visual field and the use of nontraditional flight displays"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:14Z"}