{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/19511"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/19511","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"A Japan-United States comparison of apology styles","abstract":"The current investigation compares the U.S. American and Japanese perceptions of, and reaction to, situations that potentially require apology. Two hundred U.S. and 181 Japanese college students completed a questionnaire in which each was asked to: (a) rate the victim's and the offender's initial reactions to the situation, (b) produce a message indicating what the offender would say in response to the situation, and (c) rate the victim's feelings after the message was delivered. The messages were deconstructed into minimal meaningful segments and were coded to indicate the apology strategies used.","abstract_html":"The current investigation compares the U.S. American and Japanese perceptions of, and reaction to, situations that potentially require apology. Two hundred U.S. and 181 Japanese college students completed a questionnaire in which each was asked to: (a) rate the victim's and the offender's initial reactions to the situation, (b) produce a message indicating what the offender would say in response to the situation, and (c) rate the victim's feelings after the message was delivered. The messages were deconstructed into minimal meaningful segments and were coded to indicate the apology strategies used.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Sugimoto, Naomi"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Speech Communication","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Clark, Ruth Anne"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-05-07T12:09:47Z","date_published":"2011-05-07T12:09:47Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:14Z","subjects":["Speech Communication","Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 1995 Sugimoto, Naomi"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9522181","(UMI)AAI9522181"],"render_values":[{"text":"AAI9522181","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"(UMI)AAI9522181","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19511","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Clark, Ruth Anne"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Sugimoto, Naomi"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-05-07T12:09:47Z","10000-01-01","1995"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Speech Communication"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Speech Communication","Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 1995 Sugimoto, Naomi"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["AAI9522181","(UMI)AAI9522181","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19511"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The current investigation compares the U.S. American and Japanese perceptions of, and reaction to, situations that potentially require apology. Two hundred U.S. and 181 Japanese college students completed a questionnaire in which each was asked to: (a) rate the victim's and the offender's initial reactions to the situation, (b) produce a message indicating what the offender would say in response to the situation, and (c) rate the victim's feelings after the message was delivered. The messages were deconstructed into minimal meaningful segments and were coded to indicate the apology strategies used.","Both U.S. Americans and Japanese expected the victim to be upset about the situation, even more upset if the offender did not respond to the situation, and less upset if the offender responded. Japanese anticipated the victim to be more upset than did Americans both before and after the message was delivered as well as about the damage and with the offender.","Members of both cultures reported that the offender would be more likely to respond than not, and expected the following features to be included in the message: (a) statement of remorse, (b) accounts, (c) evaluation of damage, and (d) reparation. The use of other strategies such as promise not to repeat the same offense was more specific to situations than to cultures. U.S. Americans used accounts strategies more often than did Japanese. Japanese employed reparation, compensation, promise not to repeat the same offense, and request for forgiveness strategies more often than did U.S. Americans.","These cultural differences are attributed to differences in: (a) physical realities, (b) cultural norms, and (c) beliefs about communication in the two cultures.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:09:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9522181.pdf: 13042895 bytes, checksum: 4940279d7c812b10616c9e35ee09d435 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1995","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:37:31Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:15:25-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A Japan-United States comparison of apology styles"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Clark, Ruth Anne"],"dc:creator":["Sugimoto, Naomi"],"dc:date":["2011-05-07T12:09:47Z","10000-01-01","1995"],"dc:description":["The current investigation compares the U.S. American and Japanese perceptions of, and reaction to, situations that potentially require apology. Two hundred U.S. and 181 Japanese college students completed a questionnaire in which each was asked to: (a) rate the victim's and the offender's initial reactions to the situation, (b) produce a message indicating what the offender would say in response to the situation, and (c) rate the victim's feelings after the message was delivered. The messages were deconstructed into minimal meaningful segments and were coded to indicate the apology strategies used.","Both U.S. Americans and Japanese expected the victim to be upset about the situation, even more upset if the offender did not respond to the situation, and less upset if the offender responded. Japanese anticipated the victim to be more upset than did Americans both before and after the message was delivered as well as about the damage and with the offender.","Members of both cultures reported that the offender would be more likely to respond than not, and expected the following features to be included in the message: (a) statement of remorse, (b) accounts, (c) evaluation of damage, and (d) reparation. The use of other strategies such as promise not to repeat the same offense was more specific to situations than to cultures. U.S. Americans used accounts strategies more often than did Japanese. Japanese employed reparation, compensation, promise not to repeat the same offense, and request for forgiveness strategies more often than did U.S. Americans.","These cultural differences are attributed to differences in: (a) physical realities, (b) cultural norms, and (c) beliefs about communication in the two cultures.","Made available in DSpace on 2011-05-07T12:09:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) 9522181.pdf: 13042895 bytes, checksum: 4940279d7c812b10616c9e35ee09d435 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1995","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by Howard Ding (hding2@illinois.edu) on 2011-05-07T14:37:31Z Item is restricted indefinitely.","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:15:25-05:00 Original Data Group with Access UIUC Users [automated] Release Date: none Reason: ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","ETDs are only available to UIUC Users without author permission","U of I Only"],"dc:identifier":["AAI9522181","(UMI)AAI9522181","http://hdl.handle.net/2142/19511"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 1995 Sugimoto, Naomi"],"dc:subject":["Speech Communication","Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies"],"dc:title":["A Japan-United States comparison of apology styles"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Speech Communication"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:14Z"}