{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/18634"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/18634","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Forging a punishing state: The punitive turn in U.S. criminal and social policy, 1968-1980","abstract":"This dissertation examines two intertwined recent phenomena: welfare state retrenchment and burgeoning carceral institutions. Through research on seminal struggles over welfare, drug, and criminal sentencing policy, it chronicles a profound shift during the 1970s where programs that championed punishment, expulsion, and retribution supplanted policies that stressed rehabilitation and social reintegration. Specifically, it examines New York’s adoption of the nation’s harshest drug penalties in the Rockefeller Drug Laws; campaigns in Illinois and California designed to control “welfare abuses” through criminalization and community surveillance; and California’s passage of the first major determinate sentencing law, which abandoned rehabilitation as an aim of incarceration. The project explores legislators’ motivations for these policies, their fervent public support, and the constrained agency of prisoners, welfare recipients, and drug offenders. These legislative battles served a productive cultural role in rationalizing new economic conditions, demarcating membership in the polity, and redefining state legitimacy and responsibility.","abstract_html":"This dissertation examines two intertwined recent phenomena: welfare state retrenchment and burgeoning carceral institutions. Through research on seminal struggles over welfare, drug, and criminal sentencing policy, it chronicles a profound shift during the 1970s where programs that championed punishment, expulsion, and retribution supplanted policies that stressed rehabilitation and social reintegration. Specifically, it examines New York’s adoption of the nation’s harshest drug penalties in the Rockefeller Drug Laws; campaigns in Illinois and California designed to control “welfare abuses” through criminalization and community surveillance; and California’s passage of the first major determinate sentencing law, which abandoned rehabilitation as an aim of incarceration. The project explores legislators’ motivations for these policies, their fervent public support, and the constrained agency of prisoners, welfare recipients, and drug offenders. These legislative battles served a productive cultural role in rationalizing new economic conditions, demarcating membership in the polity, and redefining state legitimacy and responsibility.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kohler-Hausmann, Julilly"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"History","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Pleck, Elizabeth H.","Leff, Mark H.","Barrett, James R.","Roediger, David R.","Lang, Clarence E."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2011,"date_issued":"2011-01-21T22:52:36Z","date_published":"2011-01-21T22:52:36Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:11Z","subjects":["Welfare Reform","Political History (1970s)","Welfare Fraud","Rockefeller Drug Laws","Criminal Sentencing","Determinate Sentencing","U.S. History (Modern)","Public Policy","Punitive Policy"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2010 Julilly Kohler-Hausmann"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/18634","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Pleck, Elizabeth H.","Leff, Mark H.","Barrett, James R.","Roediger, David R.","Lang, Clarence E."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kohler-Hausmann, Julilly"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2011-01-21T22:52:36Z","2015-02-05T11:00:37Z","2017-05-18T09:15:13Z","2010-12"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["History"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Welfare Reform","Political History (1970s)","Welfare Fraud","Rockefeller Drug Laws","Criminal Sentencing","Determinate Sentencing","U.S. History (Modern)","Public Policy","Punitive Policy"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2010 Julilly Kohler-Hausmann"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/18634"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This dissertation examines two intertwined recent phenomena: welfare state retrenchment and burgeoning carceral institutions. Through research on seminal struggles over welfare, drug, and criminal sentencing policy, it chronicles a profound shift during the 1970s where programs that championed punishment, expulsion, and retribution supplanted policies that stressed rehabilitation and social reintegration. Specifically, it examines New York’s adoption of the nation’s harshest drug penalties in the Rockefeller Drug Laws; campaigns in Illinois and California designed to control “welfare abuses” through criminalization and community surveillance; and California’s passage of the first major determinate sentencing law, which abandoned rehabilitation as an aim of incarceration. The project explores legislators’ motivations for these policies, their fervent public support, and the constrained agency of prisoners, welfare recipients, and drug offenders. These legislative battles served a productive cultural role in rationalizing new economic conditions, demarcating membership in the polity, and redefining state legitimacy and responsibility.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-08-30T17:41:22Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Kohler-Hausmann_Julilly.doc: 948736 bytes, checksum: 7dd96ae29aa1f84eb98a87029ba96c1c (MD5) Kohler-Hausmann_Julilly.pdf: 1785634 bytes, checksum: e8da657ff7ac1ad80a975a7d1b373f6b (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-01-21T22:52:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Kohler-Hausmann_Julilly.pdf: 1785634 bytes, checksum: e8da657ff7ac1ad80a975a7d1b373f6b (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: 72d0897a8af7ddd28ce05ab7804ce9a9 (MD5) Kohler-Hausmann_Julilly.doc: 948736 bytes, checksum: 7dd96ae29aa1f84eb98a87029ba96c1c (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2011-01-21T22:54:01Z Item is restricted until 2013-01-21T22:53:34Z","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:11:02-05:00 Original Data Group with Access Administrator Release Date: 2015-02-05 10:33:02 UTC Reason: Student requested Closed Access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system. extended for another two years","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-11-05T16:33:02Z Item is restricted until 2015-02-05T16:33:02Z","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 18726 on 2015-02-05T11:00:37Z.","Embargo to restrict to UIUC applied by kappleg2@illinois.edu 2015-5-18","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 18726 on 2017-05-18T09:15:13Z."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Forging a punishing state: The punitive turn in U.S. criminal and social policy, 1968-1980"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Pleck, Elizabeth H.","Leff, Mark H.","Barrett, James R.","Roediger, David R.","Lang, Clarence E."],"dc:creator":["Kohler-Hausmann, Julilly"],"dc:date":["2011-01-21T22:52:36Z","2015-02-05T11:00:37Z","2017-05-18T09:15:13Z","2010-12"],"dc:description":["This dissertation examines two intertwined recent phenomena: welfare state retrenchment and burgeoning carceral institutions. Through research on seminal struggles over welfare, drug, and criminal sentencing policy, it chronicles a profound shift during the 1970s where programs that championed punishment, expulsion, and retribution supplanted policies that stressed rehabilitation and social reintegration. Specifically, it examines New York’s adoption of the nation’s harshest drug penalties in the Rockefeller Drug Laws; campaigns in Illinois and California designed to control “welfare abuses” through criminalization and community surveillance; and California’s passage of the first major determinate sentencing law, which abandoned rehabilitation as an aim of incarceration. The project explores legislators’ motivations for these policies, their fervent public support, and the constrained agency of prisoners, welfare recipients, and drug offenders. These legislative battles served a productive cultural role in rationalizing new economic conditions, demarcating membership in the polity, and redefining state legitimacy and responsibility.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-08-30T17:41:22Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Kohler-Hausmann_Julilly.doc: 948736 bytes, checksum: 7dd96ae29aa1f84eb98a87029ba96c1c (MD5) Kohler-Hausmann_Julilly.pdf: 1785634 bytes, checksum: e8da657ff7ac1ad80a975a7d1b373f6b (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2011-01-21T22:52:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Kohler-Hausmann_Julilly.pdf: 1785634 bytes, checksum: e8da657ff7ac1ad80a975a7d1b373f6b (MD5) license.txt: 4064 bytes, checksum: 72d0897a8af7ddd28ce05ab7804ce9a9 (MD5) Kohler-Hausmann_Julilly.doc: 948736 bytes, checksum: 7dd96ae29aa1f84eb98a87029ba96c1c (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2011-01-21T22:54:01Z Item is restricted until 2013-01-21T22:53:34Z","Restriction data tranferred 2014-07-01T11:11:02-05:00 Original Data Group with Access Administrator Release Date: 2015-02-05 10:33:02 UTC Reason: Student requested Closed Access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system. extended for another two years","Item marked as restricted to the 'Administrator' Group (id=1) by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-11-05T16:33:02Z Item is restricted until 2015-02-05T16:33:02Z","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 18726 on 2015-02-05T11:00:37Z.","Embargo to restrict to UIUC applied by kappleg2@illinois.edu 2015-5-18","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 18726 on 2017-05-18T09:15:13Z."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/18634"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2010 Julilly Kohler-Hausmann"],"dc:subject":["Welfare Reform","Political History (1970s)","Welfare Fraud","Rockefeller Drug Laws","Criminal Sentencing","Determinate Sentencing","U.S. History (Modern)","Public Policy","Punitive Policy"],"dc:title":["Forging a punishing state: The punitive turn in U.S. criminal and social policy, 1968-1980"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["History"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:11Z"}