{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/17007"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/17007","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The role of relevant information in functional counterfactual thinking","abstract":"Although counterfactual thinking is typically activated by a negative outcome, it can have positive effects by helping to regulate and improve future behavior. Known as the content-specific pathway, these counterfactual ruminations use relevant information (i.e., information that is directly related to the problem at hand) to elicit insights about the problem, create a connection between the counterfactual and the desired behavior, and strengthen relevant behavioral intentions. The current research examines how changing the type of relevant information provided (i.e., so that it is either concrete and detailed or general and abstract) influences the relationship between counterfactual thinking and behavioral intentions. Experiments 1 and 2 found that counterfactual thinking facilitated relevant intentions when these statements involved detailed information (Experiment 1) or specific behaviors (Experiment 2) compared to general information (Experiment 1), categories of behavior, or traits (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 found that counterfactuals containing a category of behavior facilitated specific behavioral intentions, relative to counterfactuals focusing on a trait. However, counterfactuals only facilitated intentions that included specific behaviors, but not when intentions focused on categories of behaviors or traits (Experiment 4). Finally, this effect generalized to other relevant specific behaviors; a counterfactual based on one relevant specific behavior facilitated an intention based on another relevant specific behavior (Experiment 5). Together, these studies further clarify our understanding of the content-specific pathway and provide a more comprehensive understanding of functional counterfactual thinking.","abstract_html":"Although counterfactual thinking is typically activated by a negative outcome, it can have positive effects by helping to regulate and improve future behavior. Known as the content-specific pathway, these counterfactual ruminations use relevant information (i.e., information that is directly related to the problem at hand) to elicit insights about the problem, create a connection between the counterfactual and the desired behavior, and strengthen relevant behavioral intentions. The current research examines how changing the type of relevant information provided (i.e., so that it is either concrete and detailed or general and abstract) influences the relationship between counterfactual thinking and behavioral intentions. Experiments 1 and 2 found that counterfactual thinking facilitated relevant intentions when these statements involved detailed information (Experiment 1) or specific behaviors (Experiment 2) compared to general information (Experiment 1), categories of behavior, or traits (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 found that counterfactuals containing a category of behavior facilitated specific behavioral intentions, relative to counterfactuals focusing on a trait. However, counterfactuals only facilitated intentions that included specific behaviors, but not when intentions focused on categories of behaviors or traits (Experiment 4). Finally, this effect generalized to other relevant specific behaviors; a counterfactual based on one relevant specific behavior facilitated an intention based on another relevant specific behavior (Experiment 5). Together, these studies further clarify our understanding of the content-specific pathway and provide a more comprehensive understanding of functional counterfactual thinking.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Smallman, Rachel E."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Roese, Neal J.","Ross, Brian H.","Albarracin, Dolores","Preston, Jesse L.","Epstude, Kai"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-08-31T20:03:58Z","date_published":"2010-08-31T20:03:58Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:09Z","subjects":["Social Cognition","Counterfactual Thinking","Intentions"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2010 Rachel Elizabeth Smallman"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/17007","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Roese, Neal J.","Ross, Brian H.","Albarracin, Dolores","Preston, Jesse L.","Epstude, Kai"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Smallman, Rachel E."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2010-08-31T20:03:58Z","2012-09-07T16:43:36Z","2010-08"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Social Cognition","Counterfactual Thinking","Intentions"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2010 Rachel Elizabeth Smallman"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/17007"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Although counterfactual thinking is typically activated by a negative outcome, it can have positive effects by helping to regulate and improve future behavior. Known as the content-specific pathway, these counterfactual ruminations use relevant information (i.e., information that is directly related to the problem at hand) to elicit insights about the problem, create a connection between the counterfactual and the desired behavior, and strengthen relevant behavioral intentions. The current research examines how changing the type of relevant information provided (i.e., so that it is either concrete and detailed or general and abstract) influences the relationship between counterfactual thinking and behavioral intentions. Experiments 1 and 2 found that counterfactual thinking facilitated relevant intentions when these statements involved detailed information (Experiment 1) or specific behaviors (Experiment 2) compared to general information (Experiment 1), categories of behavior, or traits (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 found that counterfactuals containing a category of behavior facilitated specific behavioral intentions, relative to counterfactuals focusing on a trait. However, counterfactuals only facilitated intentions that included specific behaviors, but not when intentions focused on categories of behaviors or traits (Experiment 4). Finally, this effect generalized to other relevant specific behaviors; a counterfactual based on one relevant specific behavior facilitated an intention based on another relevant specific behavior (Experiment 5). Together, these studies further clarify our understanding of the content-specific pathway and provide a more comprehensive understanding of functional counterfactual thinking.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-07-09T22:07:17Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: c86efc18dcad582292eb4604daa12783 (MD5) Smallman_Rachel.pdf: 736160 bytes, checksum: 94866ba3f2bdf6eb4f3f4114a7da76c8 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-08-31T20:03:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 7 Smallman_Rachel.pdf: 736160 bytes, checksum: 94866ba3f2bdf6eb4f3f4114a7da76c8 (MD5) Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 1_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 2_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 3_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 1_Smallman_Rachel.pdf: 736157 bytes, checksum: 0602d5207edaad70f941227d2cfda752 (MD5) license.txt: 4065 bytes, checksum: f645053f35579f765925e19d40edeff4 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2010-08-31T20:04:55Z Item is restricted until 2012-08-31T20:04:44Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-09-07T16:43:35Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Dissertations and Theses (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - Psychology (ID: 590) No. of bitstreams: 8 Smallman_Rachel.pdf: 736160 bytes, checksum: 94866ba3f2bdf6eb4f3f4114a7da76c8 (MD5) Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 1_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 2_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 3_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 1_Smallman_Rachel.pdf: 736157 bytes, checksum: 0602d5207edaad70f941227d2cfda752 (MD5) license.txt: 4065 bytes, checksum: f645053f35579f765925e19d40edeff4 (MD5) 1_Smallman_Rachel.pdf.txt: 151344 bytes, checksum: 25c507086d77ddfff883e4a547cdd892 (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-09-07T16:43:36Z"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The role of relevant information in functional counterfactual thinking"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Roese, Neal J.","Ross, Brian H.","Albarracin, Dolores","Preston, Jesse L.","Epstude, Kai"],"dc:creator":["Smallman, Rachel E."],"dc:date":["2010-08-31T20:03:58Z","2012-09-07T16:43:36Z","2010-08"],"dc:description":["Although counterfactual thinking is typically activated by a negative outcome, it can have positive effects by helping to regulate and improve future behavior. Known as the content-specific pathway, these counterfactual ruminations use relevant information (i.e., information that is directly related to the problem at hand) to elicit insights about the problem, create a connection between the counterfactual and the desired behavior, and strengthen relevant behavioral intentions. The current research examines how changing the type of relevant information provided (i.e., so that it is either concrete and detailed or general and abstract) influences the relationship between counterfactual thinking and behavioral intentions. Experiments 1 and 2 found that counterfactual thinking facilitated relevant intentions when these statements involved detailed information (Experiment 1) or specific behaviors (Experiment 2) compared to general information (Experiment 1), categories of behavior, or traits (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 found that counterfactuals containing a category of behavior facilitated specific behavioral intentions, relative to counterfactuals focusing on a trait. However, counterfactuals only facilitated intentions that included specific behaviors, but not when intentions focused on categories of behaviors or traits (Experiment 4). Finally, this effect generalized to other relevant specific behaviors; a counterfactual based on one relevant specific behavior facilitated an intention based on another relevant specific behavior (Experiment 5). Together, these studies further clarify our understanding of the content-specific pathway and provide a more comprehensive understanding of functional counterfactual thinking.","Item withdrawn by Mark Zulauf (zulauf@illinois.edu) on 2010-07-09T22:07:17Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 2 Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: c86efc18dcad582292eb4604daa12783 (MD5) Smallman_Rachel.pdf: 736160 bytes, checksum: 94866ba3f2bdf6eb4f3f4114a7da76c8 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2010-08-31T20:03:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 7 Smallman_Rachel.pdf: 736160 bytes, checksum: 94866ba3f2bdf6eb4f3f4114a7da76c8 (MD5) Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 1_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 2_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 3_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 1_Smallman_Rachel.pdf: 736157 bytes, checksum: 0602d5207edaad70f941227d2cfda752 (MD5) license.txt: 4065 bytes, checksum: f645053f35579f765925e19d40edeff4 (MD5)","Item marked as restricted to the 'UIUC Users [automated]' Group (id=2) by William Ingram (wingram2@illinois.edu) on 2010-08-31T20:04:55Z Item is restricted until 2012-08-31T20:04:44Z","Item reinstated by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-09-07T16:43:35Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Dissertations and Theses (ID: 204) Dissertations and Theses - Psychology (ID: 590) No. of bitstreams: 8 Smallman_Rachel.pdf: 736160 bytes, checksum: 94866ba3f2bdf6eb4f3f4114a7da76c8 (MD5) Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 1_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 2_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 3_Smallman_Rachel.doc: 275968 bytes, checksum: fcae78fb9a4cd86e3edbe2c1f4e2579b (MD5) 1_Smallman_Rachel.pdf: 736157 bytes, checksum: 0602d5207edaad70f941227d2cfda752 (MD5) license.txt: 4065 bytes, checksum: f645053f35579f765925e19d40edeff4 (MD5) 1_Smallman_Rachel.pdf.txt: 151344 bytes, checksum: 25c507086d77ddfff883e4a547cdd892 (MD5)","Item released from any restrictions by Sarah Shreeves (sshreeve@illinois.edu) on 2012-09-07T16:43:36Z"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/17007"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2010 Rachel Elizabeth Smallman"],"dc:subject":["Social Cognition","Counterfactual Thinking","Intentions"],"dc:title":["The role of relevant information in functional counterfactual thinking"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:09Z"}